Growth Factors Engineered for Super-Affinity to the Extracellular Matrix Enhance Tissue Healing

Toward Successful Tissue Repair The therapeutic use of growth factors in tissue regeneration has suffered from safety and efficacy issues. Reasoning that the unmet potential may be because of nonphysiological delivery, Martino et al. (p. 885) engineered growth factors to bind strongly to extracellular matrix proteins. These variants were able to induce superior tissue repair, compared to the wild-type proteins. Furthermore, unwanted side effects were decreased: For example, the engineered angiogenic growth factor VEGF showed reduced vascular permeability, a concern that has limited the therapeutic efficacy of wild-type VEGF. A strategy to engineer tissues uses substantially lower growth factor levels without compromising tissue viability. Growth factors (GFs) are critical in tissue repair, but their translation to clinical use has been modest. Physiologically, GF interactions with extracellular matrix (ECM) components facilitate localized and spatially regulated signaling; therefore, we reasoned that the lack of ECM binding in their clinically used forms could underlie the limited translation. We discovered that a domain in placenta growth factor-2 (PlGF-2123-144) binds exceptionally strongly and promiscuously to ECM proteins. By fusing this domain to the GFs vascular endothelial growth factor–A, platelet-derived growth factor–BB, and bone morphogenetic protein–2, we generated engineered GF variants with super-affinity to the ECM. These ECM super-affinity GFs induced repair in rodent models of chronic wounds and bone defects that was greatly enhanced as compared to treatment with the wild-type GFs, demonstrating that this approach may be useful in several regenerative medicine applications.

[1]  M. Hellmich,et al.  Proteolytic Processing Regulates Placental Growth Factor Activities* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  Jeffrey J. Rice,et al.  Tenascin C Promiscuously Binds Growth Factors via Its Fifth Fibronectin Type III-Like Domain , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  Adrian Ranga,et al.  Heparin-binding domain of fibrin(ogen) binds growth factors and promotes tissue repair when incorporated within a synthetic matrix , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Melody A. Swartz,et al.  Intravital Immunofluorescence for Visualizing the Microcirculatory and Immune Microenvironments in the Mouse Ear Dermis , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  E. Woo Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: adverse events reported to the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[6]  J. Jansen,et al.  Evaluation of bone regeneration using the rat critical size calvarial defect , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[7]  C. Laurencin,et al.  Studies of bone morphogenetic protein-based surgical repair. , 2012, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[8]  L. Snel,et al.  Safety of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB in Augment® Bone Graft , 2012, Journal of tissue engineering.

[9]  S. Falco The discovery of placenta growth factor and its biological activity , 2012, Experimental & Molecular Medicine.

[10]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Engineering the Growth Factor Microenvironment with Fibronectin Domains to Promote Wound and Bone Tissue Healing , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[11]  Didier Y. R. Stainier,et al.  Molecular control of endothelial cell behaviour during blood vessel morphogenesis , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[12]  R. Kirsner,et al.  Dynamic reciprocity in the wound microenvironment , 2011, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[13]  Mikaël M. Martino,et al.  The 12th-14th type III repeats of fibronectin function as a highly promiscuous growth factor-binding domain. , 2010, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[14]  N. Ferrara Binding to the Extracellular Matrix and Proteolytic Processing: Two Key Mechanisms Regulating Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Action , 2010, Molecular biology of the cell.

[15]  Mikaël M. Martino,et al.  Controlling integrin specificity and stem cell differentiation in 2D and 3D environments through regulation of fibronectin domain stability. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[16]  Arnold I Caplan,et al.  All MSCs are pericytes? , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[17]  F. Wurm,et al.  Valproic acid: a viable alternative to sodium butyrate for enhancing protein expression in mammalian cell cultures. , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[18]  David Silverstein,et al.  Growth factor binding to the pericellular matrix and its importance in tissue engineering. , 2007, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[19]  Franklin Peale,et al.  Neuropilin-1 Binds to VEGF121 and Regulates Endothelial Cell Migration and Sprouting* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  N. Gallay,et al.  The In Vitro Migration Capacity of Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Comparison of Chemokine and Growth Factor Chemotactic Activities , 2007, Stem cells.

[21]  Rodney K. Chan,et al.  Effect of Recombinant Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (Regranex®) on Wound Closure in Genetically Diabetic Mice , 2006, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[22]  Natalie Muller,et al.  Orbital shaker technology for the cultivation of mammalian cells in suspension. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  Franz E Weber,et al.  Bone repair with a form of BMP-2 engineered for incorporation into fibrin cell ingrowth matrices. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  Geoffrey C Gurtner,et al.  Topical vascular endothelial growth factor accelerates diabetic wound healing through increased angiogenesis and by mobilizing and recruiting bone marrow-derived cells. , 2004, The American journal of pathology.

[25]  W. Carter,et al.  Validation of a Model for the Study of Multiple Wounds in the Diabetic Mouse (db/db) , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[26]  J. Ware,et al.  Therapeutic angiogenesis in cardiovascular disease , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[27]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Repair of bone defects using synthetic mimetics of collagenous extracellular matrices , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  D. Mooney,et al.  Polymeric system for dual growth factor delivery , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[29]  B. J. Limberg,et al.  Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 and Neuropilin-1 Form a Receptor Complex That Is Responsible for the Differential Signaling Potency of VEGF165 and VEGF121 * , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Direct Three‐Dimensional Morphometric Analysis of Human Cancellous Bone: Microstructural Data from Spine, Femur, Iliac Crest, and Calcaneus , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[31]  M. Shibuya,et al.  Neuropilin-1 Is a Placenta Growth Factor-2 Receptor* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  Mikaël M. Martino,et al.  Engineering the Regenerative Microenvironment with Biomaterials , 2013, Advanced healthcare materials.

[33]  D. Botstein,et al.  References and Notes , 2022 .