The influence of laser and powder defocusing characteristics on the surface quality in laser direct metal deposition

Abstract To investigate the influencing rules of the variations of powder and laser defocusing distance on surface quality and obtain the smooth surface of parts in laser direct metal deposition, the thin-walled metal parts were fabricated under three different powder defocusing distances and three different laser defocusing distances conditions. The experimental results show that a high surface quality can be obtained with the powder focussed below the substrate and laser focussed above the substrate process, and the variation in which the powder focus moves from above to below the melt pool plays a leading role and the variation in which the laser focus moves from above to below the melt pool plays a supplementary role in the influence on the surface quality. To explain the experimental results, a simple model of the track height is established.

[1]  G. K. Lewis,et al.  Practical considerations and capabilities for laser assisted direct metal deposition , 2000 .

[2]  Frank P. Incropera,et al.  Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer , 1981 .

[3]  W. Steen,et al.  Design characteristics and development of a nozzle for coaxial laser cladding , 1998 .

[4]  T. R. Anthony,et al.  Heat treating and melting material with a scanning laser or electron beam , 1977 .

[5]  Jehnming Lin,et al.  Concentration mode of the powder stream in coaxial laser cladding , 1999 .

[6]  Lin Li,et al.  Modelling powder concentration distribution from a coaxial deposition nozzle for laser-based rapid tooling , 2004 .

[7]  Lijun Li,et al.  Effects of powder concentration distribution on fabrication of thin-wall parts in coaxial laser cladding , 2005 .

[8]  Reinhart Poprawe,et al.  Investigation on the direct laser metallic powder deposition process via temperature measurement , 2006 .

[9]  Noboru Kikuchi,et al.  Closed loop direct metal deposition : art to part , 2000 .

[10]  R. Poprawe,et al.  Characterization of the process control for the direct laser metallic powder deposition , 2006 .

[11]  Radovan Kovacevic,et al.  Sensing, modeling and control for laser-based additive manufacturing , 2003 .

[12]  Thomas W. Eagar,et al.  Temperature fields produced by traveling distributed heat sources , 1983 .

[13]  Yanxiang Li,et al.  Study on overlapping in the laser cladding process , 1997 .

[14]  M. L. Griffith,et al.  Understanding thermal behavior in the LENS process , 1999 .

[15]  Andrew J. Pinkerton,et al.  The significance of deposition point standoff variations in multiple-layer coaxial laser cladding (coaxial cladding standoff effects) , 2004 .

[16]  Nan Yang,et al.  Concentration model based on movement model of powder flow in coaxial laser cladding , 2009 .

[17]  Jehnming Lin,et al.  A simple model of powder catchment in coaxial laser cladding , 1999 .

[18]  J. Mei,et al.  Near net shape manufacturing of components using direct laser fabrication technology , 2003 .

[19]  Jichang Liu,et al.  In-time motion adjustment in laser cladding manufacturing process for improving dimensional accuracy and surface finish of the formed part , 2004 .

[20]  Weidong Huang,et al.  The influences of processing parameters on forming characterizations during laser rapid forming , 2003 .

[21]  Lijun Li,et al.  Effects of process variables on laser direct formation of thin wall , 2007 .