How Chaotic is the Balanced State?

Large sparse circuits of spiking neurons exhibit a balanced state of highly irregular activity under a wide range of conditions. It occurs likewise in sparsely connected random networks that receive excitatory external inputs and recurrent inhibition as well as in networks with mixed recurrent inhibition and excitation. Here we analytically investigate this irregular dynamics in finite networks keeping track of all individual spike times and the identities of individual neurons. For delayed, purely inhibitory interactions we show that the irregular dynamics is not chaotic but stable. Moreover, we demonstrate that after long transients the dynamics converges towards periodic orbits and that every generic periodic orbit of these dynamical systems is stable. We investigate the collective irregular dynamics upon increasing the time scale of synaptic responses and upon iteratively replacing inhibitory by excitatory interactions. Whereas for small and moderate time scales as well as for few excitatory interactions, the dynamics stays stable, there is a smooth transition to chaos if the synaptic response becomes sufficiently slow (even in purely inhibitory networks) or the number of excitatory interactions becomes too large. These results indicate that chaotic and stable dynamics are equally capable of generating the irregular neuronal activity. More generally, chaos apparently is not essential for generating the high irregularity of balanced activity, and we suggest that a mechanism different from chaos and stochasticity significantly contributes to irregular activity in cortical circuits.

[1]  M. Timme,et al.  Stable irregular dynamics in complex neural networks. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[2]  S. Strogatz,et al.  Synchronization of pulse-coupled biological oscillators , 1990 .

[3]  Marc Timme,et al.  How Precise is the Timing of Action Potentials? , 2009, Front. Neurosci..

[4]  D. Hansel,et al.  Very long transients, irregular firing, and chaotic dynamics in networks of randomly connected inhibitory integrate-and-fire neurons. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Timme Marc.  Chaos is Unlikely to Underly the Irregularity of Cortical Dynamics , 2008 .

[6]  Arvind Kumar,et al.  The High-Conductance State of Cortical Networks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[7]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Fast Global Oscillations in Networks of Integrate-and-Fire Neurons with Low Firing Rates , 1999, Neural Computation.

[8]  S Jahnke,et al.  How chaotic is the balanced state? , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[9]  Marc Timme,et al.  Designing the dynamics of spiking neural networks. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[10]  D. Amit,et al.  Model of global spontaneous activity and local structured activity during delay periods in the cerebral cortex. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  Prof. Dr. Dr. Valentino Braitenberg,et al.  Cortex: Statistics and Geometry of Neuronal Connectivity , 1998, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[12]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  Chaos in Neuronal Networks with Balanced Excitatory and Inhibitory Activity , 1996, Science.

[13]  Germán Mato,et al.  On Numerical Simulations of Integrate-and-Fire Neural Networks , 1998, Neural Computation.

[14]  M. Timme,et al.  Unstable attractors: existence and robustness in networks of oscillators with delayed pulse coupling , 2005, cond-mat/0501384.

[15]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Dynamics of Sparsely Connected Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Spiking Neurons , 2000, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Timme,et al.  Long chaotic transients in complex networks. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[17]  Antonio Politi,et al.  Desynchronization in diluted neural networks. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Marc Timme,et al.  Coexistence of regular and irregular dynamics in complex networks of pulse-coupled oscillators. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[19]  Haim Sompolinsky,et al.  Chaotic Balanced State in a Model of Cortical Circuits , 1998, Neural Computation.

[20]  S. Strogatz,et al.  Splay states in globally coupled Josephson arrays: Analytical prediction of Floquet multipliers. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[21]  M. Timme,et al.  Designing complex networks , 2006, q-bio/0606041.

[22]  Tim P Vogels,et al.  Signal Propagation and Logic Gating in Networks of Integrate-and-Fire Neurons , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Nicholas T. Carnevale,et al.  Simulation of networks of spiking neurons: A review of tools and strategies , 2006, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[24]  Dezhe Z Jin,et al.  Fast convergence of spike sequences to periodic patterns in recurrent networks. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[25]  Marc Timme,et al.  The simplest problem in the collective dynamics of neural networks: is synchrony stable? , 2008, 0810.4472.

[26]  Anthony N. Burkitt,et al.  A Review of the Integrate-and-fire Neuron Model: I. Homogeneous Synaptic Input , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[27]  Bruno Cessac,et al.  On Dynamics of Integrate-and-Fire Neural Networks with Conductance Based Synapses , 2007, Frontiers Comput. Neurosci..