Use of Demineralized Bone Matrix in Ankle/Hindfoot Fusion

Sixty-three patients who underwent complex ankle or hindfoot fusion had demineralized bone matrix placed in their fusion site to stimulate fusion. Thirty-seven patients had Grafton putty, a demineralized bone matrix product, and 26 patients had Orthoblast, a demineralized bone matrix mixed with crushed cancellous allograft bone placed to stimulate their fusion site. All patients were followed clinically and radiographically to fusion or nonunion. Of the 37 patients who had Grafton putty placed to stimulate ankle or hindfoot fusion, five (14%) developed a nonunion. Of the 26 patients who had Orthoblast placed to stimulate fusion, two (8%) developed a nonunion. These differences were not statistically significant. Nonunion rates of approximately 10% continue to be reported for ankle and hindfoot fusion procedures. In an attempt to minimize this complication, various bone graft substitutes have been used. We found no difference in efficacy of the two demineralized bone matrix compounds, and were not able to demonstrate a superior union rate compared to historical controls.

[1]  A. Levine,et al.  Chronic Donor Site Pain Complicating Bone Graft Harvesting From the Posterior Iliac Crest for Spinal Fusion , 1992, Spine.

[2]  J. Michelson,et al.  Use of Demineralized Bone Matrix in Hindfoot Arthrodesis , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  R E Booth,et al.  Harvesting Autogenous Iliac Bone Grafts: A Review of Complications and Techniques , 1989, Spine.

[4]  S. Bulstra,et al.  Osteogenic activity of OP-1 bone morphogenetic protein (BMP-7) in a human fibular defect , 1999 .

[5]  L. Titus,et al.  New formulations of demineralized bone matrix as a more effective graft alternative in experimental posterolateral lumbar spine arthrodesis. , 1999, Spine.

[6]  M. Urist Bone: Formation by Autoinduction , 1965, Science.

[7]  D. Carnes,et al.  Ability of commercial demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft to induce new bone formation. , 1996, Journal of periodontology.

[8]  W. Bristow Arthrodesis , 1927, British medical journal.

[9]  A. Burstein,et al.  The healing of segmental bone defects induced by demineralized bone matrix. A radiographic and biomechanical study. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  D. Davy,et al.  Induction of bone by a demineralized bone matrix gel: A study in a rat femoral defect model , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  C. Cheung,et al.  Revision arthrodesis of the foot and ankle. , 2004, Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery.

[12]  L. Crosby,et al.  Complications Following Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis* , 1996, Foot & ankle international.

[13]  V. J. Sammarco,et al.  Modern issues in bone graft substitutes and advances in bone tissue technology. , 2002, Foot and ankle clinics.