Global Links: Multinationals, Foreign Ownership and Productivity Growth in Canadian Manufacturing

This paper examines two potential benefits of foreign-controlled plants in the Canadian manufacturing sector: the superior performance of foreign-controlled plants and their productivity spillovers to domestic plants. The paper finds that foreign-controlled plants are more productive, more innovative, more technology intensive, pay higher wages and use more skilled workers. This foreign-ownership advantage is found to be a multinational advantage. What matters for economic performance is whether plants belong to multinational enterprises (MNEs) rather than ownership per se. Canadian multinationals are as productive as foreign multinationals. We also find that MNEs have accounted for a disproportionately large share of productivity growth in the last two decades. Finally, we find robust evidence for productivity spillovers from foreign-controlled plants to domestic-controlled plants arising from increased competition and greater use of new technologies among domestic plants.

[1]  Ilan Vertinsky,et al.  The Economic Performance of Foreign Affiliates in Canada , 1994 .

[2]  Multinational Enterprises, International Trade, and Productivity Growth : Firm-Level Evidence From the United States , 2003 .

[3]  John H. Dunning,et al.  International production and the multinational enterprise , 1981 .

[4]  J. Haltiwanger,et al.  Aggregate Productivity Growth: Lessons from Microeconomic Evidence , 1998 .

[5]  Foreign Multinationals and Head Office Employment in Canadian Manufacturing Firms , 2005 .

[6]  R. Griffith,et al.  Characteristics of Foreign-Owned Firms in British Manufacturing , 2001 .

[7]  John R. Baldwin,et al.  Innovation and Knowledge Creation in an Open Economy: References , 2003 .

[8]  J. Haltiwanger,et al.  Aggregate Productivity Growth , 2001 .

[9]  R. Caves.  Multinational Firms, Competition, and Productivity in Host-Country Markets , 1974 .

[10]  John R. Baldwin,et al.  Impact of the Adoption of Advanced Information and Communication Technologies on Firm Performance in the Canadian Manufacturing Sector , 2002 .

[11]  R. Vernon.  Where Are the Multinationals Headed , 1993 .

[12]  Mark Doms,et al.  Comparing Wages, Skills, and Productivity between Domestically and Foreign-Owned Manufacturing Establishments in the United States , 1998 .

[13]  Salvador Barrios,et al.  Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers: Evidence from the Spanish experience , 2002 .

[14]  John R. Baldwin,et al.  Plant Turnover and Productivity Growth in Canadian Manufacturing , 2006 .

[15]  Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Boost the Productivity of Domestic Firms , 2007 .

[16]  J. Baldwin,et al.  Structural Change in the Canadian Manufacturing Sector (1970-90) , 1994 .

[17]  S. Globerman.  Foreign Direct Investment and `Spillover' Efficiency Benefits in Canadian Manufacturing Industries. , 1979 .

[18]  S. Redding,et al.  Productivity Convergence and Foreign Ownership at the Establishment Level , 2002 .

[19]  H. Görg,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment, Spillovers and Absorptive Capacity: Evidence from Quantile Regressions , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  Y. Kinoshita.  R&D and Technology Spillovers Via FDI: Innovation and Absorptive Capacity , 2000 .

[21]  Wulong Gu,et al.  Innovation, Survival and Performance of Canadian Manufacturing Plants , 2004 .

[22]  Industrial Competition, Shifts in Market Share and Productivity Growth , 2004 .

[23]  John R. Baldwin,et al.  The Dynamics of Industrial Competition , 1995 .

[24]  J. Baldwin,et al.  Global Links: Long-Term Trends in Foreign Investment and Foreign Control in Canada, 1960 to 2000 , 2005 .

[25]  Brian Aitken.  Do domestic firms benefit from foreign direct investment? Evidence from panel data , 1994 .

[26]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Productivity and Firm Turnover in Israeli Industry: 1979-1988 , 1992 .