Child custody cases: A content analysis of evaluations in practice.

Guidelines for custody evaluations recommend multiple ways for assessing the parent-child relationship and outline appropriate means of assessing special issues such as domestic violence, child abuse, and substance use. However, little is known about the implementation of these guidelines in practice. This study examines 60% of custody evaluations in one circuit court over a 2-year period. Custody evaluations were examined for adherence to guidelines and for differences based on evaluator training. This analysis suggests much variety in techniques used and a lack of consistency between guidelines and clinical practice. The findings suggest a need for more standardized approaches to conducting custody evaluations as well as the assessment of domestic violence, child abuse, and substance abuse.

[1]  C. Leukefeld,et al.  Divorce, Custody, and Spousal Violence: A Random Sample of Circuit Court Docket Records , 2003, Journal of Family Violence.

[2]  R. Walker,et al.  Child Custody Evaluations and Domestic Violence: Case Comparisons , 2002, Violence and Victims.

[3]  F. A. Quinnell,et al.  Psychological tests used in child custody evaluations. , 2001, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[4]  F. A. Quinnell,et al.  Psychologists' current practices and procedures in child custody evaluations: Five years after American Psychological Association guidelines. , 2001 .

[5]  P. Litzelfelner.  The effectiveness of CASAs in achieving positive outcomes for children. , 2000, Child welfare.

[6]  Conciliation Courts.  Family and conciliation courts review , 2000 .

[7]  Philip M. Stahl.  Complex issues in child custody evaluations , 1999 .

[8]  R. Gardner.  Guidelines for Assessing Parental Preference in Child-Custody Disputes , 1999 .

[9]  R. Gardner.  Assessment for the Stronger, Healthier Psychological Bond in Child-Custody Evaluations , 1999 .

[10]  M. Mason.  The Custody Wars: Why Children Are Losing The Legal Battle--and What We Can Do About It , 1999 .

[11]  T. H. Blau.  The Forensic Documentation Sourcebook: A Comprehensive Collection of Forms and Records for Forensic Mental Health Practice , 1998 .

[12]  J. Gould.  Conducting Scientifically Crafted Child Custody Evaluations , 1998 .

[13]  B. Carpenter,et al.  Custody evaluations: a survey of mental health professionals , 1998 .

[14]  P. Jaffe,et al.  Child custody disputes and domestic violence: Critical Issues for mental health, social service, and legal professionals. , 1998 .

[15]  E. Jouriles,et al.  Children exposed to marital violence: Theory, research, and applied issues. , 1998 .

[16]  M. Hunter,et al.  Psychologists' ratings of the best-interests-of-the-child custody and access criterion: A family systems assessment model. , 1997 .

[17]  M. Ackerman,et al.  Custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals (revisited). , 1997 .

[18]  T. Grisso,et al.  Review of Instruments Assessing Parenting Competencies used in Child Custody Evaluations , 1996 .

[19]  P. Leung.  Is the Court-Appointed Special Advocate Program Effective? A Longitudinal Analysis of Time Involvement and Case Outcomes. , 1996 .

[20]  M. Ackerman.  Clinician's guide for child custody evaluations , 1994 .

[21]  D. Brodzinsky.  On the use and misuse of psychological testing in child custody evaluations. , 1993 .

[22]  J. Poertner,et al.  Who best represents the interests of the child in court? , 1990, Child welfare.

[23]  J. Hamilton,et al.  VIOLENCE AND VICTIMS The Contribution of Victimology to Forensic Psychiatry , 1987, The Lancet.

[24]  L. Bloom,et al.  Child custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals. , 1986 .

[25]  D. H. Mills.  Ethics education and adjudication within psychology. , 1984 .

[26]  R L Stubblefield,et al.  Behavioral sciences and the law. , 1966, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.