Irreversible JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold

To estimate the visually lossless threshold for Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) 2000 compression of contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) images, 100 images were compressed to four different levels: a reversible (as negative control) and irreversible 5:1, 10:1, and 15:1. By alternately displaying the original and the compressed image on the same monitor, six radiologists independently determined if the compressed image was distinguishable from the original image. For each reader, we compared the proportion of the compressed images being rated distinguishable from the original images between the reversible compression and each of the three irreversible compressions using the exact test for paired proportions. For each reader, the proportion was not significantly different between the reversible (0–1%, 0/100 to 1/100) and irreversible 5:1 compression (0–3%). However, the proportion significantly increased with the irreversible 10:1 (95–99%) and 15:1 compressions (100%) versus reversible compression in all readers (P < 0.001); 100 and 95% of the 5:1 compressed images were rated indistinguishable from the original images by at least five of the six readers and all readers, respectively. Irreversibly 5:1 compressed abdominal CT images are visually lossless and, therefore, potentially acceptable for primary interpretation.

[1]  R A Olshen,et al.  Thoracic CT images: effect of lossy image compression on diagnostic accuracy. , 1994, Radiology.

[2]  S. Daly.  Application of a noise-adaptive contrast sensitivity function to image data compression , 1990 .

[3]  S Sone,et al.  Effects of JPEG and wavelet compression of spiral low-dose ct images on detection of small lung cancers. , 2001, Acta radiologica.

[4]  G S Gazelle,et al.  Focal hepatic lesions: effect of three-dimensional wavelet compression on detection at CT. , 1997, Radiology.

[5]  G. Rubin,et al.  Data explosion: the challenge of multidetector-row CT. , 2000, European journal of radiology.

[6]  J A Brink,et al.  Evaluation of JPEG and wavelet compression of body CT images for direct digital teleradiologic transmission. , 2000, Radiology.

[7]  P R Mueller,et al.  CT colonography with teleradiology: effect of lossy wavelet compression on polyp detection--initial observations. , 2001, Radiology.

[8]  Henry Rusinek,et al.  Wavelet compression of low-dose chest CT data: effect on lung nodule detection. , 2003, Radiology.

[9]  Henry Rusinek,et al.  Effect of CT image compression on computer-assisted lung nodule volume measurement. , 2005, Radiology.

[10]  G. James Blaine,et al.  Factors affecting the selection of compression algorithms for projection radiography , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[11]  M Mahesh,et al.  Dose and pitch relationship for a particular multislice CT scanner. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  M L Giger,et al.  Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography. , 1991, Radiology.

[13]  R. Newcombe.  Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  A. Manduca,et al.  Wavelet compression of medical images. , 1998, Radiology.

[15]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  JPEG2000 compression of thin-section CT images of the lung: effect of compression ratio on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[16]  Geoffrey D Rubin,et al.  3-D imaging with MDCT. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[17]  H Nakata,et al.  Irreversible Data Compression in Chest Imaging Using Computed Radiography: An Evaluation , 1994, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[18]  Yoshimitsu Ohgiya,et al.  Acute cerebral infarction: effect of JPEG compression on detection at CT. , 2003, Radiology.

[19]  S Sone,et al.  Effect of CT digital image compression on detection of coronary artery calcification. , 2000, Acta radiologica.

[20]  A. Manduca,et al.  Detection of subtle abnormalities on chest radiographs after irreversible compression. , 1998, Radiology.

[21]  Kevin McEnery,et al.  Impact of multislice CT on PACS resources. , 2002, Journal of digital imaging.

[22]  Henry Rusinek,et al.  Computed Tomography Diagnosis Utilizing Compressed Image Data: An ROC Analysis Using Acute Appendicitis as a Model , 2002, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[23]  Edward Muka,et al.  Irreversible JPEG compression of digital chest radiographs for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold. , 2003, Radiology.

[24]  F. Liddell.  Simplified exact analysis of case-referent studies: matched pairs; dichotomous exposure. , 1983, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[25]  Sang Tae Kim,et al.  Managing the CT Data Explosion: Initial Experiences of Archiving Volumetric Datasets in a Mini-PACS , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.