Reassessing cow comfort measures on Canadian dairy farms after a recommendation of improvements

Abstract In a previous study (Assessment 1), an on-farm assessment tool was used to establish a standard across 60 Quebec dairy farms using animal-, stall-, and management-based measures of cow comfort. The objective of the present follow-up study (Assessment 2) was to perform a reassessment using an identical cow comfort assessment tool on a subset of the original farms expected to benefit most from applying the recommended changes, and to determine the effects of the modifications on cow comfort. From the subsample of farms, 24 reported applying stall modifications based on recommendations from Assessment 1 with the aim of promoting cow comfort (Adopters), while the remaining 10 farms did not (Non-adopters). The assessment tool included 19 target areas, grouped into 9 critical areas based on measures of cow comfort that considered housing, feed-water, health, and welfare. The on-farm report of Assessment 1 was found to increase producer awareness of issues in cow comfort measures on farms, as shown by an improvement in stall design according to recommendations based on cow body dimensions and reduced injury prevalence. Routine reassessment of cow comfort measures may be important to use in supporting target achievement improvements as part of welfare improvement strategies.

[1]  E. Vasseur,et al.  Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy as a Tool to Study Milk Composition Changes in Dairy Cows Attributed to Housing Modifications to Improve Animal Welfare , 2021, Foods.

[2]  E. Vasseur,et al.  Making tiestalls more comfortable: IV. Increasing stall bed length and decreasing manger wall height to heal injuries and increase lying time in dairy cows housed in deep-bedded tiestalls. , 2020, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  D. Kelton,et al.  A survey of practices implemented to improve cow comfort following an initial assessment on Canadian dairy farms , 2019, Canadian Journal of Animal Science.

[4]  J. Rushen,et al.  Producer estimates of prevalence and perceived importance of lameness in dairy herds with tiestalls, freestalls, and automated milking systems. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  J. Rushen,et al.  Technical note: Assessing lameness in tie-stalls using live stall lameness scoring. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  J. Rushen,et al.  Effect of following recommendations for tiestall configuration on neck and leg lesions, lameness, cleanliness, and lying time in dairy cows. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  D. Kelton,et al.  Prevalence of and risk factors for hock and knee injuries on dairy cows in tiestall housing in Canada. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  J. Rushen,et al.  Prevalence of lameness and associated risk factors in Canadian Holstein-Friesian cows housed in freestall barns. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  E Vasseur,et al.  Development and implementation of a training program to ensure high repeatability of body condition scoring of dairy cows. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  E. Paul,et al.  Reducing lameness in dairy herds--overcoming some barriers. , 2013, Research in veterinary science.

[11]  J. Rushen,et al.  Sampling cows to assess lying time for on-farm animal welfare assessment. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  J. Rushen,et al.  A training programme to ensure high repeatability of injury scoring of dairy cows , 2012 .

[13]  C. Brenninkmeyer,et al.  Risk factors for lameness in freestall-housed dairy cows across two breeds, farming systems, and countries. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  S Dippel,et al.  Assessing lameness in cows kept in tie-stalls. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  D. Weary,et al.  Influence of neck-rail placement on free-stall preference, use, and cleanliness. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  D M Weary,et al.  Improving stall design: use of 3-D kinematics to measure space use by dairy cows when lying down. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  R. Dewhurst,et al.  On the relationship between lactational performance and health: is it yield or metabolic imbalance that cause production diseases in dairy cattle? A position paper , 2003 .

[18]  J. Rushen,et al.  An assessment tool to help producers improve cow comfort on their farms. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  J. Rushen,et al.  Technical note: a comparison of 2 methods of assessing lameness prevalence in tiestall herds. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  J. Rushen,et al.  CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE CARE AND HANDLING OF DAIRY CATTLE : REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ON PRIORITY ISSUES March 2009 Dairy Code of Practice Scientists ’ Committee , 2009 .