Modeling the complexities of human performance

The Man-machine Integrated Design and Analysis System (MIDAS) is an integrated human performance modeling software tool that symbolically represents a human's perceptual, cognitive and motor systems in an integrated fashion to produce emergent, high level behavioral predictions characteristic of actual human performance. MIDAS has been augmented in a number of significant ways to simulate even more realistic simulations of human behavior in various aerospace operational contexts. The effort undertaken in the current project culminated in an agent-based sub model (e.g. slots) that can be used by a variety of models to predict and recreate short- and long-term effects of stressors (fatigue, stress, time pressure, inadequate situation awareness, etc.) on performance in aerospace accidents/incidents causation. A computational simulation demonstrated performance influences brought to task performance by fatigue (as characterized by the Yerkes-Dodson theoretical threshold model) that is incurred while undertaking activities required to complete a goal behavior, and the impact of performance-influencing factors (PIFs) on human performance output by combining this with a primitive based action error vulnerability. This paper discusses the computational development effort undertaken in creating the conceptual relationship and PIF implementation in MIDAS.

[1]  A. Borbély A two process model of sleep regulation. , 1982, Human neurobiology.

[2]  J H McCracken,et al.  Analyses of Selected LHX Mission Functions: Implications for Operator Workload and System Automation Goals , 1984 .

[3]  C D Wickens THE MULTIPLE RESOURCES MODEL OF HUMAN PERFORMANCE: IMPLICATIONS FOR DISPLAY DESIGN , 1984 .

[4]  John M. Flach,et al.  5 – Information Processing , 1988 .

[5]  David C. Nagel,et al.  Human factors in aviation , 1988 .

[6]  Brian F. Gore,et al.  The Study of Distributed Cognition in Free Flight: A Human Performance Modeling Tool Structural Comparison , 2000 .

[7]  R. Yerkes,et al.  The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit‐formation , 1908 .

[8]  Douglas A. Wiegmann,et al.  APPLYING THE HUMAN FACTORS ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ( HFACS ) TO THE ANALYSIS OF COMMERCIAL AVIATION ACCIDENT DATA , 2001 .

[9]  D. Dinges,et al.  Summary of the key features of seven biomathematical models of human fatigue and performance. , 2004, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[10]  Brian F Gore Human Performance Cognitive-Behavioral Modeling: A Benefit for Occupational Safety , 2002, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[11]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognitive reliability and error analysis method , 1998 .

[12]  Marilyn Bohl,et al.  Information processing , 1971 .

[13]  Kenneth R. Boff,et al.  Engineering data compendium : human perception and performance , 1988 .

[14]  S.M. Harris,et al.  Information Processing , 1977, Nature.

[15]  T. Balkin,et al.  Fatigue models for applied research in warfighting. , 2004, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.