Does Loving an Avatar Threaten Real Life Marriage

Normal 0 MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 The purpose of this study was to examine the nature of relationship satisfaction and its predictors for those who simultaneously maintain committed relationships, in both real life (RL) and in an immersive virtual world, with either the same or a different partner. All 236 self-selected study participants were recruited on the virtual, multiplayer, online game and social platform of Second Life (SL), screened to insure that they had a committed relationship with both an avatar and a RL partner, and then asked to respond to an online survey about these relationships, and how satisfying they were. The results showed that (1) virtual committed relationships with a partner other than one’s RL partner were extremely prevalent (81.7%), (2) both males and females were highly satisfied with their virtual intimate relationships, (3) no RL relationship was found to be significantly more satisfying than any SL relationship in any statistical analysis conducted, (4) females tended to define their SL relationships as being significantly more satisfying than their RL relationships, (5) males tended to define their SL and RL relationships as equally satisfying, and (6) that those older in RL tended to be more satisfied with their virtual relationship than those who were younger. These results were interpreted in terms of their implications for culture, RL relationships and RL marriage.

[1]  F. Fincham,et al.  Research on the Nature and Determinants of Marital Satisfaction: A Decade in Review , 2000 .

[2]  I Ibáñez,et al.  Online chat rooms: virtual spaces of interaction for socially oriented people. , 2002, Cyberpsychology & behavior : the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society.

[3]  Jiali Ye,et al.  Attachment Style Differences in Online Relationship Involvement: An Examination of Interaction Characteristics and Relationship Satisfaction , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[4]  Zaheer Hussain,et al.  Gender Swapping and Socializing in Cyberspace: An Exploratory Study , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[5]  Deb Levine,et al.  Virtual Attraction: What Rocks Your Boat , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[6]  Monica T. Whitty,et al.  Pushing the Wrong Buttons: Men's and Women's Attitudes toward Online and Offline Infidelity , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[7]  Maria J. Lavooy,et al.  Does Virtual Intimacy Exist? A Brief Exploration into Reported Levels of Intimacy in Online Relationships , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[8]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  `Making Moosic': The Development of Personal Relationships on Line and a Comparison to their Off-Line Counterparts , 1998 .

[9]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. , 1996 .

[10]  Beverley Fehr,et al.  Dimensions of Relationship Quality , 2002 .

[11]  Tera D. Letzring,et al.  Predicting relationship quality from self-verification of broad personality traits among romantic couples , 2010 .

[12]  C. Rusbult,et al.  Predicting Satisfaction and Commitment in Adult Romantic Involvements: An Assessment of the Generalizability of the Investment Model , 1986 .

[13]  Elizabeth A. Hardie,et al.  Finding Love Online: The Nature and Frequency of Australian Adults' Internet Relationships , 2006 .

[14]  Robert W. Norton,et al.  Measuring marital quality, A critical look at the dependent variable , 1983 .

[15]  B. Fredrickson,et al.  Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. , 2005, The American psychologist.

[16]  Scott E. Caplan,et al.  Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being among MMO players , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Tara M. Emmers-Sommer,et al.  Predictors of Relationship Satisfaction in Online Romantic Relationships , 2006 .

[18]  Emily Christofides,et al.  More Information than You Ever Wanted: Does Facebook Bring Out the Green-Eyed Monster of Jealousy? , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  Tara M. Emmers-Sommer,et al.  The Effect of Communication Quality and Quantity Indicators on Intimacy and Relational Satisfaction , 2004 .

[20]  Noelle Chesley.  Blurring Boundaries? Linking Technology Use, Spillover, Individual Distress, and Family Satisfaction , 2005 .

[21]  Paul M. G. Emmelkamp,et al.  Who am I - and if so, where? A Study on Personality in Virtual Realities , 2010 .

[22]  Adam N. Joinson,et al.  Self-Esteem, Interpersonal Risk, and Preference for E-Mail to Face-To-Face Communication , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[23]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[24]  J. Broderick,et al.  Contributions of affect, attitudes, and behavior to marital satisfaction. , 1986, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[25]  M. Meadows,et al.  I, Avatar: The Culture and Consequences of Having a Second Life , 2007 .

[26]  J. Gottman.  What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. , 1994 .

[27]  Monica T. Whitty,et al.  Liberating or debilitating? An examination of romantic relationships, sexual relationships and friendships on the Net , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Susan S. Hendrick,et al.  Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together. , 1988 .