A Sex Difference in the Specificity of Sexual Arousal

Sexual arousal is category-specific in men; heterosexual men are more aroused by female than by male sexual stimuli, whereas homosexual men show the opposite pattern. There is reason to believe that female sexual arousal is organized differently. We assessed genital and subjective sexual arousal to male and female sexual stimuli in women, men, and postoperative male-to-female transsexuals. In contrast to men, women showed little category specificity on either the genital or the subjective measure. Both heterosexual and homosexual women experienced strong genital arousal to both male and female sexual stimuli. Transsexuals showed a category-specific pattern, demonstrating that category specificity can be detected in the neovagina using a photoplethysmographic measure of female genital sexual arousal. In a second study, we showed that our results for females are unlikely to be explained by ascertainment biases. These findings suggest that sexual arousal patterns play fundamentally different roles in male and female sexuality.

[1]  R. Savin-Williams,et al.  Sexual Identity Trajectories Among Sexual-Minority Youths: Gender Comparisons , 2000, Archives of sexual behavior.

[2]  S. Gaulin,et al.  Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionarily relevant aspects of human mating psychology. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  B. Hausman.  The Man Who Would Be Queen: The Science of Gender-Bending and Transsexualism , 2005 .

[4]  A. Evers,et al.  Assessment of female sexual arousal: response specificity and construct validity. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[5]  S. Freguia,et al.  SEXUAL BEHAVIOR IN THE HUMAN FEMALE , 1955 .

[6]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle? , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Vernon L. Quinsey,et al.  Maximizing the discriminant validity of phallometric assessment data , 1992 .

[8]  N. Martin,et al.  Taxometric analyses of sexual orientation and gender identity. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  V. Quinsey,et al.  Assessment of Sexual Offenders Against Children , 1995 .

[10]  Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers , 1996 .

[11]  Kathleen D. Vohs,et al.  Is There a Gender Difference in Strength of Sex Drive? Theoretical Views, Conceptual Distinctions, and a Review of Relevant Evidence , 2001 .

[12]  S. Wolchik,et al.  Volunteer bias in research employing vaginal measures of sexual arousal , 1983, Archives of sexual behavior.

[13]  Carle C. Zimmerman,et al.  Sexual Behavior in the Human Male , 1948 .

[14]  P. Morokoff.  Volunteer Bias in the Psychophysiological Study of Female Sexuality , 1986 .

[15]  J. Geer,et al.  A vaginal plethysmograph system. , 1975, Psychophysiology.

[16]  J. Heiman.  A psychophysiological exploration of sexual arousal patterns in females and males. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[17]  N. Martin,et al.  Genetic and environmental influences on sexual orientation and its correlates in an Australian twin sample. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  R. Carroll,et al.  New women: Sexological outcomes of male-to-female gender reassignment surgery , 1999 .

[19]  P. Rust.  The Politics of Sexual Identity: Sexual Attraction and Behavior among Lesbian and Bisexual Women* , 1992 .

[20]  J. W. Mulder,et al.  Neovaginoplasty in male transsexuals: review of surgical techniques and recommendations regarding eligibility. , 1996, Annals of plastic surgery.

[21]  Anne M Johnson,et al.  Sexual behaviour and HIV epidemiology: comparative analysis in France and Britain , 1995 .

[22]  F. Bercovitch,et al.  Behavioral masculinization is independent of genital masculinization in prenatally androgenized female rhesus macaques , 1988, Hormones and Behavior.

[23]  R. Blanchard,et al.  The concept of autogynephilia and the typology of male gender dysphoria. , 1989, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[24]  L. Diamond.  What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. , 2003, Psychological review.

[25]  R. Blanchard,et al.  A Comparison of Volume and Circumference Phallometry: Response Magnitude and Method Agreement , 1999, Archives of sexual behavior.

[26]  S. Braver,et al.  Volunteer bias in erotica research: Effects of intrusiveness of measure and sexual background , 1985, Archives of sexual behavior.

[27]  L. Diamond.  Sexual identity, attractions, and behavior among young sexual-minority women over a 2-year period. , 2000, Developmental psychology.

[28]  V. Sadock.  The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States , 1995 .

[29]  J. Gagnon,et al.  The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States , 1994 .

[30]  B. Mustanski,et al.  A Critical Review of Recent Biological Research on Human Sexual Orientation , 2002, Annual review of sex research.

[31]  K FREUND,et al.  A LABORATORY METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING PREDOMINANCE OF HOMO- OR HETERO-EROTIC INTEREST IN MALE. , 1963, Behaviour research and therapy.

[32]  E. Blanchard,et al.  Responses to Complex Erotic Stimuli in Homosexual and Heterosexual Males , 1975, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[33]  D. Barlow,et al.  A Comparison of Male Heterosexual and Male Homosexual Patterns of Sexual Arousal , 1985 .

[34]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Gender differences in erotic plasticity: the female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  Sexual Preference: Its Development in Men and Women , 1982 .

[36]  N. Mcconaghy.  Unresolved Issues in Scientific Sexology , 1999, Archives of sexual behavior.

[37]  Alain Giami,et al.  Laumann (E.O), Gagnon (J.H), Michael (R.T), Michaels (S) — The Social Organization of Sexuality. Sexual Practices in the United States; Michael (R.), Gagnon (J.), Laumann (E.), Kolata (G.) — Sex in America. A Definitive Survey , 1997 .

[38]  R. Blanchard,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders. , 2001, Psychological assessment.

[39]  H. E. Adams,et al.  Voluntary control of penile tumescence among homosexual and heterosexual subjects , 1992, Archives of sexual behavior.