MathGirls: Toward Developing Girls' Positive Attitude and Self-Efficacy through Pedagogical Agents

MathGirls is a pedagogical-agent-based environment designed for high school girls learning introductory algebra. Since females are in general more interested in interactive computing and more positive about the social presence of pedagogical agents, the environment provides a girl-friendly social learning environment, where pedagogical agents encourage the girls to build constructive views of learning math. This study investigated the impact of agent presence on changes in the girls' math attitude, their math self-efficacy, and their learning; on the girls' choice of their agents; and, on their perceptions of agent affability. The results revealed that the girls with an agent developed a more positive attitude and increased self-efficacy significantly, compared to the girls without an agent. Both groups showed significant increase in their learning. The study also showed that the girls chose female agents significantly more than male agents as their learning partners and perceived peer-like agents as more affable than teacher-like agents. The finding confirms the instructional value of pedagogical agents functioning as a social cognitive tool [1].

[1]  C. Ethington,et al.  Women’s Selection of Quantitative Undergraduate Fields of Study: Direct and Indirect Influences , 1988 .

[2]  Penelope H. Dunham.  Procedures To Increase the Entry of Women in Mathematics-Related Careers. ERIC/SMEAC Mathematics Education Digest No. 3. , 1990 .

[3]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  The Role of Gender and Ethnicity in Pedagogical Agent Perception , 2003 .

[4]  D. Schunk.  reflecting positive , 2022 .

[5]  A. Bandura.  GUIDE FOR CONSTRUCTING SELF-EFFICACY SCALES , 2006 .

[6]  Kai Hakkarainen,et al.  Patterns of female and male students' participation in peer interaction in computer-supported learning , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[7]  George E. Marsh,et al.  An Instrument to Measure Mathematics Attitudes , 2004 .

[8]  Joan Ferrini-Mundy,et al.  Principles and Standards for School Mathematics: A Guide for Mathematicians , 2000 .

[9]  Jarmo Laaksolahti,et al.  Understanding Social Intelligence , 2002 .

[10]  Harold W. Stevenson,et al.  Gender Differences in Interest and Knowledge Acquisition: The United States, Taiwan, and Japan , 2002 .

[11]  A. L. Baylor,et al.  A Social-Cognitive Framework for Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions , 2006 .

[12]  A. L. Baylor,et al.  A Social-Cognitive Framework for Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions , 2006 .

[13]  Yanghee Kim.  Learners’ expectations on the desirable characteristics of learning companions , 2004 .

[14]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[15]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Against the Odds: Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Women in Mathematical, Scientific, and Technological Careers , 2000 .

[16]  Jeeheon Ryu,et al.  The API (Agent Persona Instrument) for Assessing Pedagogical Agent Persona , 2003 .

[17]  Yanghee Kim.  Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions , 2004 .

[18]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions: Building Social Relations with Learners , 2005, AIED.

[19]  David Passig,et al.  Gender preferences for multimedia interfaces , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[20]  Kirsti Lonka,et al.  Study-strategy use in learning from text. Does gender make any difference? , 2001 .

[21]  Joseph E. Beck,et al.  Macroadapting Animalwatch to Gender and Cognitive Differnces with Respect to Hint Interactivity and Symbolism , 2000, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.