Sociotopy in the temporoparietal cortex: common versus distinct processes.

A major controversy in the social cognitive neurosciences evolved around the question whether activity in the posterior superior temporal sulcus and adjacent temporoparietal junction (pSTS/TPJ-region) evoked by various tasks represents a common process or distinct processes. To investigate this question, we employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while participants performed Biological Motion (BM), Theory-of-Mind (ToM) and Moral Judgment (MJ) tasks. Importantly, for each task we used the same newly developed animated stimuli. Indicative of a common process, we identified small clusters of overlapping activity for BM and ToM in right pSTS and for ToM and MJ in bilateral pSTS and left TPJ. Indicative of distinct processes, on the contrary, we detected extensive dissociable activity for BM in right pSTS, for ToM in bilateral pSTS and left TPJ, and for MJ in bilateral pSTS and TPJ. Thus, our data provide strong evidence for a combined two-staged process account: (i) the parsing of a stream of visual-spatial information, represented by activity in right pSTS, where neighboring and overlapping clusters of increased responses were found for all three tasks; (ii) increasingly more complex processing of the communicative significance of other people's behavior, represented by hierarchically increasing activity in left pSTS and bilateral TPJ elicited by ToM and MJ.

[1]  J. Decety,et al.  The Role of the Right Temporoparietal Junction in Social Interaction: How Low-Level Computational Processes Contribute to Meta-Cognition , 2007, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[2]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic , 2005, NeuroImage.

[4]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[5]  Isabell Wartenburger,et al.  Influence of bodily harm on neural correlates of semantic and moral decision-making , 2005, NeuroImage.

[6]  Jana Schaich Borg,et al.  Consequences, Action, and Intention as Factors in Moral Judgments: An fMRI Investigation , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  C. Frith,et al.  Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Joshua D. Greene,et al.  How (and where) does moral judgment work? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Aaron C. Koralek,et al.  Two Takes on the Social Brain: A Comparison of Theory of Mind Tasks , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  C. Frith,et al.  Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’ , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  R. Saxe,et al.  Making sense of another mind: The role of the right temporo-parietal junction , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  R. Dolan,et al.  An fMRI study of intentional and unintentional (embarrassing) violations of social norms. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[14]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment , 2001, Science.

[15]  R. Dolan,et al.  Brain Responses to the Acquired Moral Status of Faces , 2004, Neuron.

[16]  Hauke R. Heekeren,et al.  Neural correlates of social cognition in naturalistic settings: A model-free analysis approach , 2010, NeuroImage.

[17]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  R Saxe,et al.  People thinking about thinking people The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind” , 2003, NeuroImage.

[19]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Lindsey J. Powell,et al.  It's the Thought That Counts , 2006, Psychological science.

[21]  Dana Samson,et al.  Left temporoparietal junction is necessary for representing someone else's belief , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Jason P. Mitchell Activity in right temporo-parietal junction is not selective for theory-of-mind. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  J. Grafman,et al.  Opinion: the neural basis of human moral cognition. , 2005, Nature reviews. Neuroscience.

[24]  B. Bertenthal,et al.  Does Perception of Biological Motion Rely on Specific Brain Regions? , 2001, NeuroImage.

[25]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Social intelligence in the normal and autistic brain: an fMRI study , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[26]  Carla L. Harenski,et al.  Neural correlates of regulating negative emotions related to moral violations , 2006, NeuroImage.

[27]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  James K Rilling,et al.  The neural correlates of theory of mind within interpersonal interactions , 2004, NeuroImage.

[29]  Jan K. Woike,et al.  Introducing MASC: A Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition , 2006, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[30]  J. Grafman,et al.  The neural basis of human moral cognition , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  Enrico Simonotto,et al.  A visual joke fMRI investigation into Theory of Mind and enhanced risk of schizophrenia , 2006, NeuroImage.

[32]  Rebecca Elliott,et al.  Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task , 2006, NeuroImage.

[33]  T. Allison,et al.  Temporal Cortex Activation in Humans Viewing Eye and Mouth Movements , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension , 1995, Cognition.

[35]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Frontal and Temporo-Parietal Lobe Contributions to Theory of Mind: Neuropsychological Evidence from a False-Belief Task with Reduced Language and Executive Demands , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  H. F. Crovitz,et al.  A group-test for assessing hand- and eye-dominance. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[37]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  C. Frith,et al.  Interacting minds--a biological basis. , 1999, Science.

[39]  Ivanei E. Bramati,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Moral Sensitivity: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Basic and Moral Emotions , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  Patterns of fMRI Activity Dissociate Overlapping Functional Brain Areas that Respond to Biological Motion , 2006, Neuron.

[41]  R. Henson What can Functional Neuroimaging Tell the Experimental Psychologist? , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[42]  James M. Kilner,et al.  Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  Jiang Xu,et al.  Language in context: emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension , 2005, NeuroImage.

[44]  S. Vanneste,et al.  The moral brain : essays on the evolutionary and neuroscientific aspects of morality , 2009 .

[45]  R. Saxe Uniquely human social cognition , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[46]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[47]  G. McCarthy,et al.  When Strangers Pass , 2004, Psychological science.

[48]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Differential role of the orbital frontal lobe in emotional versus cognitive perspective-taking , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[50]  J. Haxby,et al.  Parallel Visual Motion Processing Streams for Manipulable Objects and Human Movements , 2002, Neuron.

[51]  R. Adolphs Neural systems for recognizing emotion , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[52]  Hauke R. Heekeren,et al.  Moral Judgment and the Brain: A Functional Approach to the Question of Emotion and Cognition in Moral Judgment Integrating Psychology, Neuroscience and Evolutionary Biology , 2009 .

[53]  J. Haxby,et al.  fMRI Responses to Video and Point-Light Displays of Moving Humans and Manipulable Objects , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  Uta Frith,et al.  Theory of mind , 2001, Current Biology.

[55]  Andrew D. Engell,et al.  The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment , 2004, Neuron.

[56]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[57]  A. Villringer,et al.  An fMRI study of simple ethical decision-making , 2003, Neuroreport.

[58]  M. Sereno,et al.  Point-Light Biological Motion Perception Activates Human Premotor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  E. Redcay The superior temporal sulcus performs a common function for social and speech perception: Implications for the emergence of autism , 2008, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.