Stochastic Formulation for Uncertainty Assessment of Two-Phase Flow in Heterogeneous Reservoirs

Summary In this article we use a direct approach to quantify the uncertainty in flow performance predictions due to uncertainty in the reservoir description. We solve moment equations derived from a stochastic mathematical statement of immiscible nonlinear two-phase flow in heterogeneous reservoirs. Our stochastic approach is different from the Monte Carlo approach. In the Monte Carlo approach, the prediction uncertainty is obtained through a statistical postprocessing of flow simulations, one for each of a large number of equiprobable realizations of the reservoir description. We treat permeability as a random space function. In turn, saturation and flow velocity are random fields. We operate in a Lagrangian framework to deal with the transport problem. That is, we transform to a coordinate system attached to streamlines ~time, travel time, and transverse displacements!. We retain the normal Eulerian ~space and time! framework for the total velocity, which we take to be dominated by the heterogeneity of the reservoir. We derive and solve expressions for the first ~mean! and second ~variance! moments of the quantities of interest. We demonstrate the applicability of our approach to complex flow geometry. Closed outer boundaries and converging/diverging flows due to the presence of sources/sinks require special mathematical and numerical treatments. General expressions for the moments of total velocity, travel time, transverse displacement, water saturation, production rate, and cumulative recovery are presented and analyzed. A detailed comparison of the moment solution approach with high-resolution Monte Carlo simulations for a variety of two-dimensional problems is presented. We also discuss the advantages and limits of the applicability of the moment equation approach relative to the Monte Carlo approach.

[1]  Dongxiao Zhang Numerical solutions to statistical moment equations of groundwater flow in nonstationary, bounded, heterogeneous media , 1998 .

[2]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Analysis of the Spatial Structure of Properties of Selected Aquifers , 1985 .

[3]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  A solute flux approach to transport in heterogeneous formations: 2. Uncertainty analysis , 1992 .

[4]  G. Dagan,et al.  A solute flux approach to transport in heterogeneous formations: 1. The general framework , 1992 .

[5]  Stanley Osher,et al.  Minimization of Grid Orientation Effects Through Use of Higher Order Finite Difference Methods , 1993 .

[6]  E. Sudicky A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: Spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and its role in the dispersion process , 1986 .

[7]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  Reactive transport and immiscible flow in geological media. II. Applications , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  Reactive transport and immiscible flow in geological media. I. General theory , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[9]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Use of variable-scale pressure test data to estimate the log hydraulic conductivity covariance and dispersivity of fractured granites near Oracle, Arizona , 1988 .

[10]  L. Gelhar Stochastic Subsurface Hydrology , 1992 .

[11]  Hamdi A. Tchelepi,et al.  Stochastic Analysis of Immiscible Two-Phase Flow in Heterogeneous Media , 1999 .

[12]  Y. Rubin Stochastic modeling of macrodispersion in heterogeneous porous media , 1990 .

[13]  Hamdi A. Tchelepi,et al.  Stochastic Formulation for Uncertainty Analysis of Two-Phase Flow in Heterogeneous Reservoirs , 2000 .

[14]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Comment on A note on head and velocity covariances in three-dimensional flow through heterogeneous , 1992 .

[15]  Dexi Zhang,et al.  Moment-equation approach to single phase fluid flow in heterogeneous reservoirs , 1999 .