A New Integrated Clinical-Biohumoral Model to Predict Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Chronic Chest Pain.

BACKGROUND In patients with chronic angina-like chest pain, the probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) is estimated by symptoms, age, and sex according to the Genders clinical model. We investigated the incremental value of circulating biomarkers over the Genders model to predict functionally significant CAD in patients with chronic chest pain. METHODS In 527 patients (60.4 years, standard deviation, 8.9 years; 61.3% male participants) enrolled in the European Evaluation of Integrated Cardiac Imaging (EVINCI) study, clinical and biohumoral data were collected. RESULTS Functionally significant CAD-ie, obstructive coronary disease seen at invasive angiography causing myocardial ischemia at stress imaging or associated with reduced fractional flow reserve (FFR < 0.8), or both-was present in 15.2% of patients. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were the only independent predictors of disease among 31 biomarkers analyzed. The model integrating these biohumoral markers with clinical variables outperformed the Genders model by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) (area under the curve [AUC], 0.70 [standard error (SE), 0.03] vs 0.58 [SE, 0.03], respectively, P < 0.001) and reclassification analysis (net reclassification improvement, 0.15 [SE, 0.07]; P = 0.04). Cross-validation of the ROC analysis confirmed the discrimination ability of the new model (AUC, 0.66). As many as 56% of patients who were assigned to a higher pretest probability by the Genders model were correctly reassigned to a low probability class (< 15%) by the new integrated model. CONCLUSIONS The Genders model has a low accuracy for predicting functionally significant CAD. A new model integrating HDL cholesterol, AST, and hs-CRP levels with common clinical variables has a higher predictive accuracy for functionally significant CAD and allows the reclassification of patients from an intermediate/high to a low pretest likelihood of CAD.

[1]  J. Kastelein,et al.  Lipid parameters for measuring risk of cardiovascular disease , 2011, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[2]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Prediction model to estimate presence of coronary artery disease: retrospective pooled analysis of existing cohorts , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  I. Shapira,et al.  The association of higher levels of within-normal-limits liver enzymes and the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome , 2010 .

[4]  J. Knuuti,et al.  EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  M. Riwanto,et al.  High density lipoproteins and endothelial functions: mechanistic insights and alterations in cardiovascular disease1 , 2013, Journal of Lipid Research.

[6]  Sandeep S. Mangalmurti,et al.  The Incremental Value of Lipids and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Determining Residual Cardiovascular Risk , 2011, Current atherosclerosis reports.

[7]  D. Giannessi Multimarker approach for heart failure management: perspectives and limitations. , 2011, Pharmacological research.

[8]  P. Barter,et al.  Antiinflammatory Properties of HDL , 2004 .

[9]  Pamela S Douglas,et al.  Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  J. Lott,et al.  Serum enzymes and isoenzymes in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of myocardial ischemia and necrosis. , 1980, Clinical chemistry.

[11]  P. Iozzo,et al.  Interpretation of the "obesity paradox": a 30-year study in patients with cardiovascular disease. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[12]  B. Zinman,et al.  Elevations in markers of liver injury and risk of type 2 diabetes: the insulin resistance atherosclerosis study. , 2004, Diabetes.

[13]  C. Stefanadis,et al.  Assessment of acute coronary syndromes: focus on novel biomarkers. , 2012, Current medicinal chemistry.

[14]  Hatem Alkadhi,et al.  A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension. , 2011, European heart journal.

[15]  Jose Luis Zamorano,et al.  Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). , 2008, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[16]  R. Turner,et al.  Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and β-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man , 1985, Diabetologia.

[17]  P. Libby,et al.  Controversies in cardiovascular medicine Clinical implications of inflammation for cardiovascular primary prevention , 2010 .

[18]  G. Diamond,et al.  Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Eckart Fleck,et al.  Safety and feasibility of high-dose dobutamine-atropine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance for diagnosis of myocardial ischaemia: experience in 1000 consecutive cases. , 2003, European heart journal.

[20]  S. Saadat,et al.  The Association of Liver Transaminase Activity With Presence and Severity of Premature Coronary Artery Disease , 2011, Angiology.

[21]  J. Gallacher,et al.  C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and cardiovascular disease prediction. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  R. Vasan,et al.  Aminotransferase Levels Are Associated With Cardiometabolic Risk Above and Beyond Visceral Fat and Insulin Resistance: The Framingham Heart Study , 2013, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[23]  A. Papavassiliou,et al.  Novel risk factors related to stable angina. , 2013, Current pharmaceutical design.

[24]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2013, European heart journal.

[25]  Gian Franco Gensini,et al.  Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease by Noninvasive Anatomical and Functional Imaging , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[26]  R. Dhir,et al.  Serum protein profiles predict coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients referred for coronary angiography , 2012, BMC Medicine.