Mismatching Meanings in Brain and Behavior

Natural language interpretation is generally thought to be compositional, that is, the meanings of expressions are a function of the meanings of their parts and of the way the parts are syntactically combined. Theories of the syntax–semantics interface aim to articulate the details of this function. This article discusses a new research program in which psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic experiments on so-called syntax–semantics mismatches are used to elucidate the mechanisms that mediate between structure and meaning.

[1]  Jorie Koster-Moeller,et al.  Processing Evidence for Quantifier Raising: the Case of Antecedent Contained Deletion , 2007 .

[2]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Underspecification and Aspectual Coercion , 2006 .

[3]  Yoad Winter.  Type Shifting with Semantic Features : A Unified Perspective , 2007 .

[4]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Gapping as constituent coordination , 1990 .

[5]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Quantifying into Question Acts , 1999 .

[6]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  An MEG Study of Silent Meaning , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  M M Piñango,et al.  Real-Time Processing Implications of Enriched Composition at the Syntax–Semantics Interface , 1999, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[8]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type‐shifting Principles , 2008 .

[9]  ALEC MARANTZ,et al.  Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language , 2005 .

[10]  Maria Mercedes Piñango,et al.  Time-Course of Semantic Composition: The Case of Aspectual Coercion , 2006, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[11]  Jimmy J. Lin.  Event structure and the encoding of arguments: the syntax of the Mandarin and English verb phrase , 2004 .

[12]  Heidi Harley,et al.  Wanting, Having, and Getting: A Note on Fodor and Lepore 1998 , 2004, Linguistic Inquiry.

[13]  C. Frith,et al.  Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[15]  David L. Davidson,et al.  The Logical Form of Action Sentences , 2001 .

[16]  L. Rizzi.  The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery , 1997 .

[17]  Christian Barker,et al.  Explaining Crossover and Superiority as Left-to-right Evaluation , 2006 .

[18]  László Dezsö,et al.  Universal Grammar , 1981, Certainty in Action.

[19]  David Poeppel,et al.  The relation between linguistics and neuroscience , 2005 .

[20]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  Processing events: Behavioral and neuromagnetic correlates of Aspectual Coercion , 2008, Brain and Language.

[21]  David Poeppel,et al.  Processing correlates of lexical semantic complexity , 2003, Cognition.

[22]  Wilhelm Geuder,et al.  Oriented Adverbs Issues in the Lexical Semantics of Event Adverbs , 2002 .

[23]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Montague Grammar , 1997, Handbook of Logic and Language.

[24]  Angelika Kratzer,et al.  The Event Argument and the Semantics of Verbs , 2002 .

[25]  David R. Dowty.  Type Raising, Functional Composition, and Non-Constituent Conjunction , 1988 .

[26]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Reference to Kinds across Language , 1998 .

[27]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Deferred Interpretations: Why Starting Dickens is Taxing but Reading Dickens Isn't , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  Ivano Caponigro,et al.  The Non-Concealed Nature of Free Relatives : Implications for Connectivity in Specificational Sentences , 2003 .

[29]  Peter Pagin,et al.  Communication and Strong Compositionality , 2003, J. Philos. Log..

[30]  Markus Egg,et al.  Beginning Novels and Finishing Hamburgers: Remarks on the Semantics of to begin , 2003, J. Semant..

[31]  Pauline Jacobson.  Towards a Variable-Free Semantics , 1999 .

[32]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Dependency and Coordination in the Grammar of Dutch and English , 1985 .

[33]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  Events as Grammatical Objects: The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax , 2001 .

[34]  Gillian Ramchand,et al.  Events in Syntax: Modification and Predication , 2007, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[35]  J. Dölling.  Ontological domains , semantic sorts and systematic ambiguity , 1995 .

[36]  M J Pickering,et al.  The processing of metonymy: evidence from eye movements. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  G. McKoon,et al.  Externally and Internally Caused Change of State Verbs. , 2000 .

[38]  Norbert Corver,et al.  Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk , 2006 .

[39]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Genitive Modifiers, Sorts, and Metonymy , 2001 .

[40]  Jesse A. Harris,et al.  The cost of question concealment: Eye-tracking and MEG evidence , 2008, Brain and Language.

[41]  G. Marcus,et al.  What developmental disorders can tell us about the nature and origins of language , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  N400-like Magnetoencephalography Responses Modulated by Semantic Context, Word Frequency, and Lexical Class in Sentences , 2002, NeuroImage.

[43]  J. Dölling,et al.  Commonsense ontology and semantics of natural language , 1993 .

[44]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  A time course analysis of enriched composition , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[45]  Christoph Schwarze,et al.  Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language , 1983 .

[46]  Irene Heim,et al.  Semantics in generative grammar , 1998 .

[47]  Peter Ludlow,et al.  Intensional 'transitive' verbs and concealed complement clauses: 2709 , 1996 .

[48]  Pauline Jacobson.  Paycheck Pronouns, Bach-Peters Sentences, and Variable-Free Semantics , 2000 .

[49]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Temporal Ontology and Temporal Reference , 1988, CL.

[50]  S. J. Keyser,et al.  The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger , 1993 .

[51]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The Generative Lexicon , 1995, CL.

[52]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking inhibits singleton capture , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[53]  Robert Frank,et al.  Aspectual Coercion and the Online Computation of Sentential Aspect , 2000 .

[54]  Zoltán Gendler Szabó.  Review: The Compositionality Papers , 2004 .

[55]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  The Architecture of the Language Faculty , 1996 .

[56]  G. Marcus.  Cognitive architecture and descent with modification , 2006, Cognition.

[57]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Coercion in sentence processing: evidence from eye-movements and self-paced reading , 2002 .

[58]  Z. Szabó.  Compositionality As Supervenience , 2000 .

[59]  Helen de Hoop,et al.  Type-shifting and Scrambled Definites , 1998, J. Semant..

[60]  Andrea E. Martin,et al.  The Anterior Midline Field: coercion or decision making? , 2009 .

[61]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Twenty-first century psycholinguistics : four cornerstones , 2005 .

[62]  Ilaria Frana,et al.  The de re Analysis of Concealed Questions: A Unified Approach to Definite and Indefinite Concealed Questions , 2006 .

[63]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Formal and Lexical Semantics and the Genitive in Negated Existential Sentences in Russian , 1998 .

[64]  Utpal Lahiri,et al.  Lexical Selection and Quantificational Variability in Embedded Interrogatives , 2000 .

[65]  G. Frege.  Über Sinn und Bedeutung , 1892 .

[66]  Anna Szabolcsi.  Binding on the Fly: Cross-Sentential Anaphora in Variable-Free Semantics , 2003 .

[67]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Combinatory grammars and parasitic gaps , 1987 .

[68]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  The processing of familiar and novel senses of a word: Why reading Dickens is easy but reading Needham can be hard , 2007 .

[69]  Yoad Winter,et al.  Atoms and Sets: A Characterization of Semantic Number , 2002, Linguistic Inquiry.

[70]  Terence Parsons,et al.  Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics , 1990 .

[71]  L. Nathan,et al.  On the interpretation of concealed questions , 2006 .

[72]  H. Harley.  Subjects, events, and licensing , 1995 .

[73]  Theo M. V. Janssen.  Chapter 7 – Compositionality , 1997 .

[74]  R. Hursthouse.  THE LOGIC OF DECISION AND ACTION , 1969 .

[75]  G. Chierchia.  Questions with quantifiers , 1992 .

[76]  Gail McKoon,et al.  Event templates in the lexical representations of verbs , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[77]  Pauline Jacobson.  The (Dis)organization of the Grammar: 25 Years , 2002 .

[78]  Johannes Dölling,et al.  Aspectual (re-)interpretation: Structural representation and processing , 2003 .

[79]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  Aspectual Coercion and Logical Polysemy , 1995, J. Semant..

[80]  Mats Rooth,et al.  Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity , 2008 .

[81]  Brian McElree,et al.  Complement Coercion Is Not Modulated by Competition: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2022 .

[82]  Maribel Romero,et al.  On Concealed Questions , 2006 .

[83]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  The Syntax-Semantics Interface , 2006 .

[84]  Brian McElree,et al.  Reading time evidence for enriched composition , 2001, Cognition.

[85]  J. McCawley.  On Identifying the Remains of Deceased Clauses , 1973 .

[86]  Richard Montague,et al.  The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English , 1973 .

[87]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Type-shifting rules and the semantics of interrogatives , 1988 .

[88]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  Chapter 14 – The Syntax-Semantics Interface: On-Line Composition of Sentence Meaning , 2006 .

[89]  R. May.  Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation , 1985 .

[90]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  INTEGRATING LEXICAL AND FORMAL SEMANTICS: GENITIVES, RELATIONAL NOUNS, AND TYPE-SHIFTING , 1998 .

[91]  Johannes Dölling,et al.  Ntological Domains, Semantic Sorts and Systematic Ambiguity , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..