The Oprah Effect: How Soft News Helps Inattentive Citizens Vote Consistently

Do the news media provide voters with sufficient information to function as competent democratic citizens? Many have answered “no,” citing as evidence the proliferation of entertainment-oriented “soft news.” Yet, public affairs-oriented “hard” news is often unappealing to politically inattentive individuals. We argue that news “quality” depends upon how well it enables citizens to determine which candidate best fits their own preferences. In this regard, for politically inattentive citizens, we argue that soft news is more efficient than traditional hard news. Drawing on the logic of low-information rationality, we derive a series of hypotheses, which we test using the 2000 National Election Study. We find that politically inattentive individuals who consumed daytime talk shows (a popular form of soft news) were more likely than their nonconsuming, inattentive counterparts to vote for the candidate who best represented their self-described preferences. This suggests soft news can facilitate voting “competence” among at least some citizens.

[1]  Richard A. Brody,et al.  Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology , 1991 .

[2]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens Are Guided by a Trusted Source , 2000 .

[3]  D. Young.  Late-Night Comedy and the Salience of the Candidates' Caricatured Traits in the 2000 Election , 2006 .

[4]  Markus Prior,et al.  Any Good News in Soft News? The Impact of Soft News Preference on Political Knowledge , 2003 .

[5]  S L Shamansky,et al.  Who governs? , 2019, Public health nursing.

[6]  S. Iyengar,et al.  News That Matters: Television and American Opinion , 1987 .

[7]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Is it time to lay the sleeper effect to rest , 1974 .

[8]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in Britain , 2002 .

[9]  W. Bennett,et al.  Mediated Politics: Mediated Political Information and Public Opinion , 2000 .

[10]  Mira Sotirovic,et al.  A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies , 2001 .

[11]  Roy C. Anderson.  Out of order , 1998, Nature.

[12]  M. Baum.  Talking the Vote: Why Presidential Candidates Hit the Talk Show Circuit , 2005 .

[13]  W. Bennett,et al.  The Burglar Alarm That Just Keeps Ringing: A Response to Zaller , 2003 .

[14]  M. Baum.  Sex, Lies, and War: How Soft News Brings Foreign Policy to the Inattentive Public , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[15]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy. , 2002 .

[16]  Claude S. Fischer,et al.  The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life , 2000 .

[17]  D. Rucinski.  The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1994 .

[18]  Stuart Macdonald,et al.  A Directional Theory of Issue Voting , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[19]  J. Zaller.  FLOATING VOTERS IN U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1948-2000 , 2004 .

[20]  J. Zaller.  A New Standard of News Quality: Burglar Alarms for the Monitorial Citizen , 2003 .

[21]  Steven J. Rosenstone,et al.  Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America , 1993 .

[22]  Thomas E. Patterson.  The Search for a Standard: Markets and Media , 2003 .

[23]  C. Humphrey,et al.  The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life , 2000 .

[24]  Mathew D. McCubbins,et al.  The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? , 1998 .

[25]  W. Bennett.  News, the politics of illusion , 1983 .

[26]  P. Ordeshook.  11. William H. Riker and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62 (March): 25–42 Cited 377 times. , 2006, American Political Science Review.

[27]  Alan G. Sawyer,et al.  The sleeper effect in persuasion: a meta-analytic review. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Michael Boss.  Economic theory of democracy , 1974 .

[29]  Jason Wittenberg,et al.  Making the Most Of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation , 2000 .

[30]  W. Riker,et al.  A Theory of the Calculus of Voting , 1968, American Political Science Review.

[31]  J. Rauch,et al.  All the News That's Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information Into News , 2006 .

[32]  J. Zaller,et al.  WHO GETS THE NEWS? ALTERNATIVE MEASURES OF NEWS RECEPTION AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH , 1993 .

[33]  M. Just.  Soft News Goes to War: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy in the New Media Age , 2006, Perspectives on Politics.

[34]  S. Keeter,et al.  What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters , 1996 .

[35]  James N. Druckman,et al.  Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens' Conversations Limit Elite Influence , 2003 .