The productive role of material design artefacts in participatory design events

Physical design artefacts are employed in a wide range of participatory design events, yet there are few comprehensive discussions of the properties and qualities of them in the literature of the field. In this paper, we examine the productive role of material design artefacts in participatory design events. First, we offer a theoretical foundation for understanding material artefacts in design, based on pragmatist philosophy. Then, we employ this theoretical perspective to analyse a case in which a range of physical design materials was employed to envision and explore a projected building, the "Urban Media Space" a new library in Aarhus, Denmark. Drawing on examples from this case, we define a series of design considerations for employing material design artefacts in collaborative design events. Our contribution is valuable both in advancing the theoretical standpoint of interaction design in general, and in allowing participatory design practitioners to reflect on their use of material design artefacts when involving users.

[1]  D. Shalin,et al.  Pragmatism and Social Interactionism , 1986 .

[2]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Cardboard Computers: Mocking-it-up or Hands-on the Future , 1992 .

[3]  Johan Redström,et al.  Textile displays: using textiles to investigate computational technology as design material , 2002, NordiCHI '02.

[4]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Personas: practice and theory , 2003, DUX '03.

[5]  Lorenza Mondada,et al.  Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence , 2006 .

[6]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research , 2000, TCHI.

[7]  Donald A. Sch.  The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[8]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  New theoretical approaches for human-computer interaction , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  A. Costall,et al.  Doing Things with Things: The Design and Use of Everyday Objects , 2006 .

[10]  Donald A. Schön.  Metaphor and Thought: Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy , 1993 .

[11]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Making representations work , 1995, CACM.

[12]  Larry A. Hickman,et al.  The Essential Dewey: Ethics, Logic, Psychology , 2009 .

[13]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Inspiration card workshops , 2006, DIS '06.

[14]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas , 2008, TCHI.

[15]  Christian Dindler,et al.  Fictional Inquiry—design collaboration in a shared narrative space , 2007 .

[16]  Gavin Melles,et al.  An Enlarged Pragmatist Inquiry Paradigm for Methodological Pluralism in Academic Design Research , 2008 .

[17]  T. Brooks.  Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart , 1999 .

[18]  Eva Brandt,et al.  Evoking the future: Drama and props in user centered design , 2000 .

[19]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart , 1999 .

[20]  Preben Mogensen,et al.  Towards a Provotyping Approach in Systems Development , 1992, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Olav W. Bertelsen,et al.  Elements of a theory of design artefacts - a contribution to critical systems development research , 1998, DAIMI PB.

[22]  N. Cross.  Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .