Fluorescence ratio measurements of double-labeled probes for multiple in situ hybridization by digital imaging microscopy.

To expand the multiplicity of the in situ hybridization (ISH) procedure, which is presently limited by the number of fluorochromes spectrally separable in the microscope, a digital fluorescence ratio method is proposed. For this purpose, chromosome-specific repetitive probes were double-labeled with two haptens and hybridized to interphase nuclei of human peripheral blood lymphocytes. The haptens were immunocytochemically detected with specific antibodies conjugated with the fluorochromes FITC or TRITC. The FITC and TRITC fluorescence intensities of spots obtained with different double-haptenized probes were measured, and the fluorescence ratio was calculated for each ISH spot. Combinations of different haptens, such as biotin, digoxigenin, fluorescein, sulfonate, acetyl amino fluorene (AAF), and mercury (Hg) were used. The fluorescence intensity ratio (FITC/TRITC) of the ISH spots was fairly constant for all combinations used, with coefficients of variation between 10 and 30%. To study the feasibility of a probe identification procedure on the basis of probe hapten ratios, one probe was double-labeled with different ratios, by varying the relative concentrations of the modified nucleotides (biotin-11-dUTP and digoxigenin-11-dUTP) in the nick-translation reaction. Measurement of the FITC and TRITC intensities of the ISH spots showed that the concentration of modified nucleotides used in the labeling procedures was reflected in the mean fluorescence intensity of the ISH spots. Furthermore, the ratio distributions showed little overlap due to the relatively small coefficients of variation. The results indicate that a multiple ISH procedure based on fluorescence ratio imaging of double-labeled probes is feasible.

[1]  Piet W. Verbeek,et al.  Low-level image processing by max–min filters , 1988 .

[2]  P. Nederlof,et al.  Three-color fluorescence in situ hybridization for the simultaneous detection of multiple nucleic acid sequences. , 1989, Cytometry.

[3]  P. Nederlof,et al.  Quantification of fluorescence in situ hybridization signals by image cytometry. , 1992, Cytometry.

[4]  E. I. Budowsky,et al.  Modification of cytidine residues with a bisulfite-O-methylhydroxylamine mixture. , 1974, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[5]  T. Cremer,et al.  Rapid interphase and metaphase assessment of specific chromosomal changes in neuroectodermal tumor cells by in situ hybridization with chemically modified DNA probes. , 1988, Experimental cell research.

[6]  D Pinkel,et al.  Detection of bcr-abl fusion in chronic myelogeneous leukemia by in situ hybridization , 1990, Science.

[7]  A. Raap,et al.  Interphase cytogenetics of brain tumors , 1991, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[8]  H. Tanke,et al.  Detection of chromosome aberrations in interphase tumor nuclei by nonradioactive in situ hybridization. , 1989, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[9]  F. Kasten The Origins of Modern Fluorescence Microscopy and Fluorescent Probes , 1989 .

[10]  J. McGee,et al.  Direct visualization of single copy genes on banded metaphase chromosomes by nonisotopic in situ hybridization. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  A. Waggoner,et al.  Cyanine dye labeling reagents for sulfhydryl groups. , 1989, Cytometry.

[12]  J. Wiegant,et al.  Detection of the Philadelphia chromosome in interphase nuclei. , 1990, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[13]  J. Hindley,et al.  Cloning of human satellite III DNA: different components are on different chromosomes. , 1979, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  J. Garson,et al.  Novel non-isotopic in situ hybridization technique detects small (1 Kb) unique sequences in routinely G-banded human chromosomes: fine mapping of N-myc and beta-NGF genes. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  R. Tsien,et al.  Measuring and manipulating cytosolic Ca2+ with trapped indicators. , 1984, Kroc Foundation series.

[16]  N. Galjart,et al.  The gene encoding human protective protein (PPGB) is on chromosome 20. , 1991, Genomics.

[17]  H. Willard,et al.  Detection of chromosome aneuploidy in interphase nuclei from human primary breast tumors using chromosome-specific repetitive DNA probes. , 1988, Cancer research.

[18]  J. Ploem,et al.  Multiple fluorescence in situ hybridization. , 1990, Cytometry.

[19]  D. Agard,et al.  The use of a charge-coupled device for quantitative optical microscopy of biological structures. , 1987, Science.

[20]  R. Aikens,et al.  Chapter 16 Solid-State Imagers for Microscopy , 1988 .

[21]  D. Ward,et al.  Simultaneous visualization of seven different DNA probes by in situ hybridization using combinatorial fluorescence and digital imaging microscopy. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  P. Nederlof,et al.  Quantification of inter- and intra-nuclear variation of fluorescence in situ hybridization signals. , 1992, Cytometry.