Numerical correction of X-ray detector backlighting

Abstract A novel approach to strongly suppress artifacts in radiography and computed tomography caused by the effect of diffuse background signals (“backlighting”) of 2D X-ray detectors is suggested. Depending on the detector geometry the mechanism may be different, either based on the optical scattering by the fluorescent screen materials into optical detection devices or Compton or X-ray fluorescence scattering by the detector components. Consequently, these erroneous intensity portions result in locally different violations of Lambert–Beer's law in single projections (radiographs). When used as input data for computed tomography these violations are directly observed via modulation of the projected mass as a function of the rotation phase and the sample's aspect ratio (dynamics). The magnitude of the diffuse background signal depends on the detector area covered by the projected sample. They are more pronounced the smaller the shadowed area and the stronger the total attenuation. This implies that the reconstruction suffers from additional anisotropic artifacts caused by elongated sample structures. This issue is studied simply by absorption of flat plates in a conventional laboratory radiography set-up and at a synchrotron radiation facility. In the latter case beam hardening artifacts can be excluded due to the monochromatic radiation. The proposed correction procedure requires simple integral intensity offsets as a constant (non-local) light scattering mechanism is assumed.

[1]  P Cloetens,et al.  Comparative study of multilayers used in monochromators for synchrotron-based coherent hard X-ray imaging. , 2010, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[2]  Andreas Koch,et al.  X-ray imaging with submicrometer resolution employing transparent luminescent screens , 1998 .

[3]  A. Kupsch,et al.  Reconstruction of limited computed tomography data of fuel cell components using Direct Iterative Re , 2011 .

[4]  C Schmidgunst,et al.  Calibration model of a dual gain flat panel detector for 2D and 3D x-ray imaging. , 2007, Medical physics.

[5]  Jae-Seung Kim,et al.  Impact of system design parameters on image figures of merit for a mouse PET scanner , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[6]  T. Martin,et al.  Recent developments in X-ray imaging with micrometer spatial resolution. , 2006, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[7]  H. Graafsma,et al.  Deconvolution of the two-dimensional point-spread function of area detectors using the maximum-entropy algorithm , 1999 .

[8]  A. Lange,et al.  Röntgenkleinwinkelbrechung an Metalldrähten, Glasfäden und hartelastischem Polyproplen , 1987 .

[9]  Frantisek Krejci,et al.  Enhancement of spatial resolution of roentgenographic methods , 2009 .

[10]  D. Mankoff,et al.  A position-sensitive detector for use in positron emission tomography , 1988 .

[11]  Ulrich Bonse,et al.  X-ray computed microtomography (μCT) using synchrotron radiation (SR) , 1996 .

[12]  S. Zabler,et al.  High resolution synchrotron-based radiography and tomography using hard X-rays at the BAMline (BESSY II) , 2008 .