Clinical staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma: current perspectives

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a disease with limited therapeutic options, the management of which is still controversial. Diagnosis is usually made by thoracoscopy, which allows multiple biopsies with histological subtyping and is indicated for staging purposes in surgical candidates. The recommended and recently updated classification for clinical use is the TNM staging system established by the International Mesothelioma Interest Group and the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, which is based mainly on surgical and pathological variables, as well as on cross-sectional imaging. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography is the primary imaging procedure. Currently, the most used measurement system for MPM is the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) method, which is based on unidimensional measurements of tumor thickness perpendicular to the chest wall or mediastinum. Magnetic resonance imaging and functional imaging with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron-emission tomography can provide additional staging information in selected cases, although the usefulness of this method is limited in patients undergoing pleurodesis. Molecular reclassification of MPM and gene expression or miRNA prognostic models have the potential to improve prognostication and patient selection for a proper treatment algorithm; however, they await prospective validation to be introduced in clinical practice.

[1]  R. Cameron Staging in the era of international databases: documented improvements with remaining challenges. , 2018, Journal of thoracic disease.

[2]  P. Boutros,et al.  The Immune Microenvironment, Genome‐wide Copy Number Aberrations, and Survival in Mesothelioma , 2017, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[3]  Robert C. Rintoul,et al.  The IASLC Mesothelioma Staging Project: Proposals for Revisions of the T Descriptors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification for Pleural Mesothelioma , 2016, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[4]  V. Rusch,et al.  The IASLC Mesothelioma Staging Project: Proposals for Revisions of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification for Pleural Mesothelioma , 2016, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[5]  F. Galateau-Sallé,et al.  The IASLC Mesothelioma Staging Project: Proposals for the M Descriptors and for Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Mesothelioma , 2016, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[6]  V. Rusch,et al.  The IASLC Mesothelioma Staging Project: Improving Staging of a Rare Disease Through International Participation , 2016, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[7]  E. Ruffini,et al.  Validation of EORTC and CALGB prognostic models in surgical patients submitted to diagnostic, palliative or curative surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2016, Journal of thoracic disease.

[8]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Solitary Fibrous Tumors: 2016 Imaging Update. , 2016, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[9]  A. C. Tanrıkulu,et al.  Prognostic value of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and other inflammatory markers in malignant pleural mesothelioma , 2016, Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine.

[10]  Thomas D. Wu,et al.  Comprehensive genomic analysis of malignant pleural mesothelioma identifies recurrent mutations, gene fusions and splicing alterations , 2016, Nature Genetics.

[11]  M. Zauderer,et al.  Contemporary Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Patients with Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma , 2016, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[12]  F. Galateau-Sallé,et al.  The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Pleura: Advances since the 2004 Classification. , 2016, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[13]  S. Armato,et al.  Imaging in pleural mesothelioma: A review of the 12th International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. , 2015, Lung cancer.

[14]  S. Ozaki,et al.  Prognostic significance of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2015, Lung cancer.

[15]  M. Caraglia,et al.  Two Different Serum MiRNA Signatures Correlate with the Clinical Outcome and Histological Subtype in Pleural Malignant Mesothelioma Patients , 2015, PloS one.

[16]  S. Fukuhara,et al.  Advance Access Publication Date: 2 April 2015 Original Article , 2022 .

[17]  E. Felip,et al.  Analysis of Expression of Programmed Cell Death 1 Ligand 1 (PD-L1) in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) , 2015, PloS one.

[18]  G. Reid,et al.  MiR‐Score: A novel 6‐microRNA signature that predicts survival outcomes in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma , 2015, Molecular oncology.

[19]  J. M. Porcel,et al.  Accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose-PET imaging for differentiating benign from malignant pleural effusions: a meta-analysis. , 2015, Chest.

[20]  K. Nabeshima,et al.  Upregulation of microRNA-31 associates with a poor prognosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma with sarcomatoid component , 2014, Medical Oncology.

[21]  N. Pavlakis,et al.  Factors associated with survival in a large series of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma in New South Wales , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[22]  A. Mansfield,et al.  B7-H1 Expression in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma is Associated with Sarcomatoid Histology and Poor Prognosis , 2014, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[23]  G. Ceresoli,et al.  Prognostic factors in elderly patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: results of a multicenter survey , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[24]  V. Rusch,et al.  Supplementary Prognostic Variables for Pleural Mesothelioma , 2014, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[25]  Vicky Goh,et al.  The association of 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters with survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[26]  E. Roca,et al.  Positive FDG-PET/CT of the Pleura Twenty Years after Talc Pleurodesis: Three Cases of Benign Talcoma , 2014, Respiration.

[27]  F. Galateau-Sallé,et al.  Molecular Classification of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Identification of a Poor Prognosis Subgroup Linked to the Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[28]  H. Clague,et al.  Malignant mesothelioma, hypoalbuminaemia and the effect of carboplatin/pemetrexed on survival. , 2013, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[29]  Giuseppe Rubini,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT in suspected recurrences of epithelial malignant pleural mesothelioma in asbestos-fibers-exposed patients (comparison to standard diagnostic follow-up). , 2013, Clinical imaging.

[30]  M. Truong,et al.  Malignant pleural mesothelioma: role of CT, MRI, and PET/CT in staging evaluation and treatment considerations. , 2013, Seminars in roentgenology.

[31]  G. Ulaner,et al.  Identifying and distinguishing treatment effects and complications from malignancy at FDG PET/CT. , 2013, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[32]  N. Roche,et al.  Outcome and prognostic factors of pleural mesothelioma after surgical diagnosis and/or pleurodesis. , 2013, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[33]  Y. Palancı,et al.  Relationship between 18 FDG PET-CT findings and the survival of 177 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2013, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[34]  F. Maldonado,et al.  18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography fused imaging in malignant mesothelioma patients: looking from outside is not enough. , 2013, Lung cancer.

[35]  J. D. de Klerk,et al.  Persistent Inflammation in Pulmonary Granuloma 48 Years after Talcage Pleurodesis, Detected by FDG-PET/CT , 2012, Case reports in medicine.

[36]  V. Rusch,et al.  Initial Analysis of the International Association For the Study of Lung Cancer Mesothelioma Database , 2012, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[37]  T. Nakano,et al.  Clinical utility of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2012, Experimental and therapeutic medicine.

[38]  C. Sima,et al.  High SUVmax on FDG-PET Indicates Pleomorphic Subtype in Epithelioid Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Supportive Evidence to Reclassify Pleomorphic as Nonepithelioid Histology , 2012, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[39]  R. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Inflammation-Based Prognostic Indices in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma , 2012, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[40]  Stephen G Swisher,et al.  Role of imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of thymoma. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[41]  M. Chatfield,et al.  Low Calretinin Expression and High Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte Ratio Are Poor Prognostic Factors in Patients with Malignant Mesothelioma Undergoing Extrapleural Pneumonectomy , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[42]  K. Uematsu,et al.  Clinical implications of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography at delayed phase for diagnosis and prognosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2011, Oncology reports.

[43]  J. Choi,et al.  Thoracic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: imaging and pathologic features , 2011, Acta radiologica.

[44]  M. Kusumoto,et al.  A case of malignant pleural mesothelioma with osseous and cartilaginous differentiation. , 2011, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[45]  D. Sugarbaker,et al.  FDG PET/CT patterns of treatment failure of malignant pleural mesothelioma: relationship to histologic type, treatment algorithm, and survival , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[46]  N. Pavlakis,et al.  High Blood Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Is an Indicator of Poor Prognosis in Malignant Mesothelioma Patients Undergoing Systemic Therapy , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[47]  D. Sugarbaker,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MRI of malignant pleural mesothelioma: preliminary assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient in histologic subtypes. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[48]  Kyung Soo Lee,et al.  Volume-Based Parameter of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Prediction of Therapeutic Response and Prognostic Implications , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[49]  R. Stahel,et al.  Malignant pleural mesothelioma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[50]  M. Millward,et al.  A Novel Prognostic Model for Malignant Mesothelioma Incorporating Quantitative FDG-PET Imaging with Clinical Parameters , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[51]  F. Favero,et al.  MicroRNA signature of malignant mesothelioma with potential diagnostic and prognostic implications. , 2010, American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology.

[52]  D. Landau,et al.  Role of Integrated 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Position Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Patients Surveillance after Multimodality Therapy of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma , 2010, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[53]  R. Aharonov,et al.  Molecular and Cellular Pathobiology Cancer Research hsa-miR-29 c * Is Linked to the Prognosis of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma , 2010 .

[54]  M. Metintaş,et al.  Clinical Value of Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Differentiation of Malignant Mesothelioma from Asbestos-Related Benign Pleural Disease: An Observational Pilot Study , 2009, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[55]  J. V. van Meerbeeck,et al.  A prognostic index for progression-free survival in malignant mesothelioma with application to the design of phase II trials: a combined analysis of 10 EORTC trials. , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[56]  W. van der Bruggen,et al.  Pleural FDG Uptake More Than a Decade after Talc Pleurodesis , 2009, Case reports in medicine.

[57]  J. Jett,et al.  Utility of integrated computed tomography-positron emission tomography for selection of operable malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2009, Clinical lung cancer.

[58]  L. Chirieac,et al.  Pathologic evaluation of malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2009, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[59]  A. Alavi,et al.  Potential of Dual Time Point FDG-PET Imaging in Differentiating Malignant from Benign Pleural Disease , 2009, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[60]  H. Çiftçi,et al.  The role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnosis of pleural diseases. , 2009, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[61]  G. Gordon,et al.  Four-gene expression ratio test for survival in patients undergoing surgery for mesothelioma. , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[62]  B. McCaughan,et al.  Prognostic features of long-term survivors after surgical management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[63]  M. Feigen,et al.  Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma , 2009, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[64]  Y. Nishiyama,et al.  Dual time point FDG PET for evaluation of malignant pleural mesothelioma , 2009, Nuclear medicine communications.

[65]  A. Loft,et al.  Preoperative staging of mesothelioma by 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography fused imaging and mediastinoscopy compared to pathological findings after extrapleural pneumonectomy. , 2008, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[66]  H. Biersack,et al.  False positive 18F-FDG-PET/CT in a patient after talc pleurodesis. , 2007, Lung cancer.

[67]  S. Larson,et al.  Positron emission tomography predicts survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2006, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[68]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a feasibility study of noninvasive assessment, therapeutic follow-up, and possible predictor of improved outcome. , 2006, Chest.

[69]  A. Olshen,et al.  Global gene expression profiling of pleural mesotheliomas: overexpression of aurora kinases and P16/CDKN2A deletion as prognostic factors and critical evaluation of microarray-based prognostic prediction. , 2006, Cancer research.

[70]  R. Flores The role of PET in the surgical management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2005, Lung cancer.

[71]  U. Haberkorn Positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of mesothelioma. , 2004, Lung cancer.

[72]  C. Nanni,et al.  Role of 18F-FDG PET for evaluating malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2004, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[73]  H. Groen,et al.  PET for the evaluation of pleural thickening observed on CT. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[74]  A. Fischman,et al.  Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and CT after talc pleurodesis. , 2004, Chest.

[75]  L. Hayman,et al.  Patterns of lymphadenopathy in thoracic malignancies. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[76]  K. Müller,et al.  Factors influencing long-term survival in mesothelioma patients—results of the German mesothelioma register , 2004, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[77]  R. Louis,et al.  Evaluation of pleural disease with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging. , 2004, Chest.

[78]  M. Byrne,et al.  Modified RECIST criteria for assessment of response in malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[79]  J. Blumenstock,et al.  Using gene expression ratios to predict outcome among patients with mesothelioma. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[80]  S. Treves,et al.  Assessment of malignant pleural mesothelioma with (18)F-FDG dual-head gamma-camera coincidence imaging: comparison with histopathology. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[81]  K R Abrams,et al.  Prognostic factors for malignant mesothelioma in 142 patients: validation of CALGB and EORTC prognostic scoring systems , 2000, Thorax.

[82]  C B Begg,et al.  Staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma: comparison of CT and MR imaging. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[83]  A. Alavi,et al.  Metabolic imaging of malignant pleural mesothelioma with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. , 1998, Chest.

[84]  J. Herndon,et al.  Factors predictive of survival among 337 patients with mesothelioma treated between 1984 and 1994 by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. , 1998, Chest.

[85]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Surgically debulked malignant pleural mesothelioma: Results and prognostic factors , 1996, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[86]  V. Rusch A proposed new international TNM staging system for malignant pleural mesothelioma. From the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. , 1995, Chest.

[87]  M. Metintaş,et al.  CT‐Guided Pleural Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Malignant Mesothelioma , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[88]  D. Sugarbaker,et al.  Malignant pleural mesothelioma: value of CT and MR imaging in predicting resectability. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[89]  H. Libshitz,et al.  Malignant pleural mesothelioma: CT manifestations in 50 cases. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[90]  Kazutomo Inoue,et al.  Over-expression of facilitative glucose transporter genes in human cancer. , 1990, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[91]  R R Miller,et al.  CT in differential diagnosis of diffuse pleural disease. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[92]  M. Becich,et al.  Validation of a Gene Expression Test for Mesothelioma Prognosis in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissues. , 2017, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[93]  S. Houshmand,et al.  Feasibility and performance of an adaptive contrast-oriented FDG PET/CT quantification technique for global disease assessment of malignant pleural mesothelioma and a brief review of the literature. , 2015, Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine.

[94]  T. Furlanetto,et al.  Solitary Fibrous Tumors , 2013 .

[95]  Takuhiro Yamaguchi,et al.  Survival and prognostic factors in malignant pleural mesothelioma: a retrospective study of 314 patients in the west part of Japan. , 2011, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[96]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[97]  R. Bai,et al.  Systemic disseminated tuberculosis mimicking malignancy on F-18 FDG PET-CT. , 2008, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[98]  F. Mottaghy,et al.  Integrated FDG PET-CT imaging improves staging in malignant pleural mesothelioma , 2007, Nuklearmedizin.

[99]  V. Ambrosini,et al.  Additional value of hybrid PET/CT fusion imaging vs. conventional CT scan alone in the staging and management of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2005, Nuclear medicine review. Central & Eastern Europe.

[100]  J. Shamash,et al.  Statistical validation of the EORTC prognostic model for malignant pleural mesothelioma based on three consecutive phase II trials. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[101]  G. Giaccone,et al.  Prognostic factors in patients with pleural mesothelioma: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer experience. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[102]  R. Wechsler,et al.  The radiology of thoracic malignant mesothelioma. , 1984, Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging.