Feature analysis of multidisciplinary scientific collaboration patterns based on PNAS

The features of collaboration patterns are often considered to be different from discipline to discipline. Meanwhile, collaborating among disciplines is an obvious feature emerged in modern scientific research, which incubates several interdisciplines. The features of collaborations in and among the disciplines of biological, physical and social sciences are analyzed based on 52,803 papers published in a multidisciplinary journal PNAS during 1999 to 2013. From those data, we found similar transitivity and assortativity of collaboration patterns as well as the identical distribution type of collaborators per author and that of papers per author, namely a mixture of generalized Poisson and power-law distributions. In addition, we found that interdisciplinary research is undertaken by a considerable fraction of authors, not just those with many collaborators or those with many papers. This case study provides a window for understanding aspects of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary collaboration patterns.

[1]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  The most highly cited Library and Information Science articles: Interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns , 2007, Scientometrics.

[2]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time , 2009, Scientometrics.

[3]  Jianping Li,et al.  Modeling the coevolution between citations and coauthorship of scientific papers , 2016, Scientometrics.

[4]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Variations between subjects in the extent to which the social sciences have become more interdisciplinary , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Tibor Braun,et al.  A quantitative view on the coming of age of interdisciplinarity in the sciences 1980-1999 , 2003, Scientometrics.

[6]  P. Weingart.  A Short History of Knowledge Formations , 2010 .

[7]  J. Rees.  TWO CULTURES , 2007, Science.

[8]  Asimina Vasalou,et al.  Impact in interdisciplinary and cross‐sector research: Opportunities and challenges , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  M E J Newman.  Assortative mixing in networks. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[10]  María Bordons,et al.  Measuring interdisciplinary collaboration within a university: The effects of the multidisciplinary research programme , 1999, Scientometrics.

[11]  Jana Diesner,et al.  Distortive effects of initial‐based name disambiguation on measurements of large‐scale coauthorship networks , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Zheng Xie,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of the Interdisciplinarity of Applied Mathematics , 2015, PloS one.

[13]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? A macrolevel study , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  A. Stirling.  A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[15]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Data-driven modeling of collaboration networks: a cross-domain analysis , 2017, EPJ Data Science.

[16]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Interdisciplinarity at the journal and specialty level: The changing knowledge bases of the journal cognitive science , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  J. Moody.  The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999 , 2004 .

[18]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Impact measures of interdisciplinary research in physics , 2002, Scientometrics.

[19]  Yun Huang,et al.  Understanding the assembly of interdisciplinary teams and its impact on performance , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[20]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.

[22]  Søren Brier,et al.  Cybersemiotics: A New Foundation for Transdisciplinary Theory of Information, Cognition, Meaningful Communication and the Interaction Between Nature and Culture , 2013 .

[23]  Stasa Milojevic,et al.  Modes of collaboration in modern science: Beyond power laws and preferential attachment , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  Jianping Li,et al.  Modelling transition phenomena of scientific coauthorship networks , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Learning and knowledge networks in interdisciplinary collaborations , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[28]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience , 2009, Scientometrics.

[29]  G. Heimeriks,et al.  Disciplinary, Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary: Concepts and Indicators. , 2001 .

[30]  P. Consul,et al.  A Generalization of the Poisson Distribution , 1973 .

[31]  S. Haustein,et al.  Long-Distance Interdisciplinarity Leads to Higher Scientific Impact , 2015, PloS one.

[32]  Jian Wang,et al.  Interdisciplinarity and Impact: Distinct Effects of Variety, Balance, and Disparity , 2014, ISSI.

[33]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery , 2009 .

[34]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[35]  Julie M. Hurd,et al.  Interdisciplinary Research in the Sciences: Implications for Library Organization , 1992 .

[36]  Diana Hicks,et al.  The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences , 1999, Scientometrics.

[37]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A Bibliometric Study of Reference Literature in the Sciences and Social Sciences , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[38]  Guo-Qing Li,et al.  Pathways of Amino Acid Degradation in Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) with Special Reference to Lysine-Ketoglutarate Reductase/Saccharopine Dehydrogenase (LKR/SDH) , 2015, PloS one.

[39]  Gabriele Bammer,et al.  Solving problems through transdisciplinary research , 2010 .

[40]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities , 2006, Scientometrics.

[41]  Jianping Li,et al.  A geometric graph model for coauthorship networks , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[42]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  A framework for knowledge integration and diffusion , 2012, J. Documentation.

[43]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Exploring the interdisciplinary evolution of a discipline: the case of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology , 2014, Scientometrics.

[44]  M. Newman.  Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  A. Porter,et al.  Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture , 2006 .

[46]  Ingo Scholtes,et al.  Predicting scientific success based on coauthorship networks , 2014, EPJ Data Science.

[47]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[48]  Geoff Cooper,et al.  A Disciplinary Matter: Critical Sociology, Academic Governance and Interdisciplinarity , 2013 .

[49]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of coauthors of scientific publications , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[50]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Are top-cited papers more interdisciplinary? , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[51]  Frank Siedlok,et al.  The Organization of Interdisciplinary Research: Modes, Drivers and Barriers , 2014 .

[52]  J. Kagan.  The Three Cultures: Natural Sciences, Social Sciences, and the Humanities in the 21st Century , 2009 .

[53]  Céline Robardet,et al.  Complex systems science: Dreams of universality, interdisciplinarity reality , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[54]  Stasa Milojevic,et al.  Accuracy of simple, initials-based methods for author name disambiguation , 2013, J. Informetrics.