Bayesian Calibration of Aerothermal Models for Hypersonic Air Vehicles

Predictive capabilities of coupled fluid-thermal-structural models for aerodynamic pressure and heating are investigated for a flat plate and spherical dome protuberances subjected to hypersonic flow conditions. Aerothermal test data from hypersonic wind tunnel experiments are used in a Bayesian network to calibrate uncertain model parameters and model discrepancies for aerodynamic pressure and heat flux predictions. A segmented Bayesian model calibration approach is explored as an alternative to full, simultaneous calibration for reduced computational cost. To quantify the viability and potential benefit of isolating calibrations of models in the network, segmented and simultaneous calibration are compared using the Kullback-Leibler distance and Bayes factor metrics. For model calibration using the aerothermal data, the segmented approach yielded greater prediction uncertainty than the simultaneous approach due to inherent correlations lost through the segmentation. However, the segmented approach resulted in calibration convergence with fewer samples, and the Bayes factor metric indicated good prediction agreement with simultaneous calibration.

[1]  Andrew R. Crowell,et al.  Surrogate Based Reduced-Order Aerothermodynamic Modeling for Structural Response Prediction at High Mach Numbers , 2011 .

[2]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Inference of equivalent initial flaw size under multiple sources of uncertainty , 2011 .

[3]  Holt Ashley,et al.  Piston Theory-A New Aerodynamic Tool for the Aeroelastician , 1956 .

[4]  Achintya Haldar,et al.  Probability, Reliability and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design (Haldar, Mahadevan) , 1999 .

[5]  Diane Villanueva,et al.  Using Expected Information Gain to Design Aerothermal Model Calibration Experiments , 2015 .

[6]  R. A. Leibler,et al.  On Information and Sufficiency , 1951 .

[7]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[8]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Model Predictive Capability Assessment Under Uncertainty , 2005 .

[9]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  A BAYES NETWORK APPROACH TO UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION IN HIERARCHICALLY DEVELOPED COMPUTATIONAL MODELS , 2012 .

[10]  Shankar Sankararaman,et al.  Uncertainty quantification and integration in engineering systems , 2012 .

[11]  Bin Liang,et al.  ERROR AND UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN MECHANICS COMPUTATIONAL MODELS , 2011 .

[12]  L. R. Hunt,et al.  Aerothermal tests of spherical dome protuberances on a flat plate at a Mach number of 6.5 , 1986 .

[13]  Radford M. Neal Slice Sampling , 2003, The Annals of Statistics.

[14]  Jack J. McNamara,et al.  Studies on Fluid-Thermal-Structural Coupling for Aerothermoelasticity in Hypersonic Flow , 2010 .

[15]  Shuangzhe Liu,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer by Andrea Saltelli, Marco Ratto, Terry Andres, Francesca Campolongo, Jessica Cariboni, Debora Gatelli, Michaela Saisana, Stefano Tarantola , 2008 .

[16]  Philippe H. Geubelle,et al.  Development and validation of a first principles fluid-thermal multi-physics solver for hypersonic boundary layer heat transfer problems , 2011 .

[17]  Jack J. McNamara,et al.  Impact of Fluid-Thermal-Structural Coupling on Response Prediction of Hypersonic Skin Panels , 2011 .

[18]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Error Quantification and Confidence Assessment of Aerothermal Model Predictions for Hypersonic Aircraft (Preprint) , 2012 .

[19]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .