Safety in Supervisory Control for Critical Systems

Recent studies show the designs of automated systems are becoming increasingly complex to meet the global competitive market. Additionally, organizations have focused on policies to achieve people’s safety and health, environmental management system, and controlling of risks, based on standards. In this context, any industrial system in the event of a fault that is not diagnosed and treated correctly could be considered to pose a serious risk to people’s health, to the environment and to the industrial equipment. According to experts, the concept of Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) is a practical solution to these types of issues. They strongly recommend layers for risk reduction based on control systems organized hierarchically in order to manage risks, preventing or mitigating faults, or to bringing the process to a safe state. Additionally, the concept of Risk and Hazard Control can be applied to accomplish the required functionalities. It is based on problem solving components and considers a cooperative way to find a control solution. In this context, the software architecture can be based on a service-oriented architecture (SOA) approach. This paper initially proposes a new architecture for design of safety control systems for critical systems, based on Safety Supervisory Control Architecture, in accordance with standards IEC 61508 and IEC 61511. Furthermore, a method is also proposed for design the control layer of risk prevention within Safety Supervisory Control Architecture.

[1]  Safety Executive Bootle Introduction to IEC 61508 , 2005 .

[2]  Heiko Krumm,et al.  Integration of a legacy automation system into a SOA for devices , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation.

[3]  Youmin Zhang,et al.  Bibliographical review on reconfigurable fault-tolerant control systems , 2003, Annu. Rev. Control..

[4]  Paulo E. Miyagi,et al.  A procedure for modeling and analysis of service-oriented and distributed productive systems , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering.

[5]  Jean-François Aubry,et al.  A Fuzzy Probabilistic Approach for Determining Safety Integrity Level , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[6]  Gheorghe Florea,et al.  Emerging technologies- the base for the next goal of process control: risk and hazard control , 2011 .

[7]  Gregory F. Cooper,et al.  A Bayesian Method for the Induction of Probabilistic Networks from Data , 1992 .

[8]  Diolino José dos Santos Filho,et al.  A TRANSCRIPTION TOOL FROM PETRI NET TO CLP PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES , 2012 .

[9]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[10]  Marvin Rausand,et al.  Architectural constraints in IEC 61508: Do they have the intended effect? , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Imrich Chlamtac,et al.  Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges , 2012, Ad Hoc Networks.

[12]  Reinaldo Squillante Júnior,et al.  MATHEMATICAL METHOD FOR MODELING AND VALIDATING OF SAFETY INSTRUMENTED SYSTEM DESIGNED ACCORDING TO IEC 61508 AND IEC 61511 , 2012 .

[13]  R. Bell,et al.  IEC 61508: functional safety of electrical/electronic/ programme electronic safety-related systems: overview , 1999 .

[14]  Y. S. Lin,et al.  Using Bayesian Network for Fault Location on Distribution Feeder , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.