Looking as if you know: Systematic object inspection precedes object recognition.

Sometimes we seem to look at the very object we are searching for, without consciously seeing it. How do we select object relevant information before we become aware of the object? We addressed this question in two recognition experiments involving pictures of fragmented objects. In Experiment 1, participants preferred to look at the target object rather than a control region 25 fixations prior to explicit recognition. Furthermore, participants inspected the target as if they had identified it around 9 fixations prior to explicit recognition. In Experiment 2, we investigated the influence of semantic knowledge in guiding object inspection prior to explicit recognition. Consistently, more specific knowledge about target identity made participants scan the fragmented stimulus more efficiently. For instance, non-target regions were rejected faster when participants knew the target object's name. Both experiments showed that participants were looking at the objects as if they knew them before they became aware of their identity.

[1]  D. S. Wooding,et al.  Fixation Patterns Made during Brief Examination of Two-Dimensional Images , 1997, Perception.

[2]  Karl J. Friston Learning and inference in the brain , 2003, Neural Networks.

[3]  Michael Bach,et al.  Early neural activity in Necker-cube reversal: evidence for low-level processing of a gestalt phenomenon. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[4]  L Stark,et al.  Eye Movements during the Viewing of Necker Cubes , 1978, Perception.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context , 1997, Nature.

[6]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Recognition As Soon as You Know It Is There, You Know What It Is , 2022 .

[7]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance , 2001, Vision Research.

[9]  Linus Holm Predictive eyes precede retrieval : visual recognition as hypothesis testing , 2007 .

[10]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. , 2006, Psychological review.

[11]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting Attention Based on Long-Term Memory Experience , 2006, Neuron.

[12]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Shapes, surfaces and saccades , 1999, Vision Research.

[13]  Jennifer A. Mangels,et al.  Predictive Codes for Forthcoming Perception in the Frontal Cortex , 2006, Science.

[14]  N. Cohen,et al.  Amnesia is a Deficit in Relational Memory , 2000, Psychological science.

[15]  Helga C. Arsenio,et al.  Panoramic search: the interaction of memory and vision in search through a familiar scene. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  H. Ritter,et al.  Disambiguating Complex Visual Information: Towards Communication of Personal Views of a Scene , 1996, Perception.

[17]  Carrick C. Williams,et al.  To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Lars Nyberg,et al.  Visual consciousness: Dissociating the neural correlates of perceptual transitions from sustained perception with fMRI , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[19]  J. Henderson,et al.  Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Arthur F Kramer,et al.  Visual Skills in Airport-Security Screening , 2004, Psychological science.

[21]  M. Potter,et al.  Time to understand pictures and words , 1975, Nature.

[22]  E. Halgren,et al.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  M. Farah,et al.  Is visual image segmentation a bottom-up or an interactive process? , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  A. Yuille,et al.  Object perception as Bayesian inference. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[25]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[26]  Linus Holm,et al.  Memory for scenes: Refixations reflect retrieval , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[27]  Junji Ito,et al.  Perceptual Switching, Eye Movements, and the Bus Paradox , 2003, Perception.

[28]  G. Deco,et al.  A Neuro-Cognitive Visual System for Object Recognition Based on Testing of Interactive Attentional Top – down Hypotheses , 2000, Perception.