Label-Free Quantitative Imaging of Sperm for In-Vitro Fertilization Using Interferometric Phase Microscopy

Accurate morphological evaluation via imaging of sperm cells is a critical step in both routine sperm analysis and sperm cell selection for in-vitro fertilization. In this paper, we review the significant advantages of interferometric phase microscopy (IPM), also called digital holographic microscopy, for label-free sperm imaging in fertility clinics. We first review the current state of the art of label-free sperm cell imaging for in-vitro fertilization, including bright-field, Zernike phase contrast, differential interference contrast (DIC), Hoffman modulation contrast and polarized light microscopy, as well as intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI). Using experimental demonstrations, we compare the limitations of these techniques for label-free sperm imaging. IPM and its advantages are then discussed in detail. These include the ability to receive quantitative data regarding the 3D structure of sperm cells, as well as data concerning sperm biomass and morphology without labeling. The current gap to clinical use is discussed, as well as the possible solution of employing compact and simple holographic modules, which may allow holographic imaging to reach the clinic in the near future.

[1]  A. Agarwal,et al.  Non-Invasive Sperm Selection for In Vitro Fertilization , 2015 .

[2]  T. Shavit,et al.  Can intra cytoplasmatic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) technique improve outcome in patients with repeated IVF–ICSI failure? a comparative study. , 2015, Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology.

[3]  L. Gianaroli,et al.  Head birefringence properties are associated with acrosome reaction, sperm motility and morphology. , 2012, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[4]  Aydogan Ozcan,et al.  High-throughput lensfree 3D tracking of human sperms reveals rare statistics of helical trajectories , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  R. Baruffi,et al.  Relationship between DNA damage and sperm head birefringence. , 2010, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[6]  YongKeun Park,et al.  Quantitative phase imaging unit. , 2014, Optics letters.

[7]  A. García-Molina,et al.  A new technique for analysis of human sperm morphology in unstained cells from raw semen. , 2016, Reproduction, Fertility and Development.

[8]  N. Raine-Fenning,et al.  Regular (ICSI) versus ultra-high magnification (IMSI) sperm selection for assisted reproduction. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[9]  Katja Knez,et al.  The IMSI procedure improves poor embryo development in the same infertile couples with poor semen quality: A comparative prospective randomized study , 2011, Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E.

[10]  N. Gatimel,et al.  Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) does not improve outcome in patients with two successive IVF-ICSI failures , 2016, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[11]  N. Shaked,et al.  Compact and portable low-coherence interferometer with off-axis geometry for quantitative phase microscopy and nanoscopy. , 2013, Optics express.

[12]  Z. Shoham,et al.  Textbook of assisted reproductive technologies : laboratory and clinical perspectives , 2008 .

[13]  R. Chattopadhyay,et al.  Selection of birefringent spermatozoa under Polscope: effect on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome , 2012, Andrologia.

[14]  Catherine Yourassowsky,et al.  Focus plane detection criteria in digital holography microscopy by amplitude analysis. , 2006, Optics express.

[15]  Pietro Ferraro,et al.  4D tracking of clinical seminal samples for quantitative characterization of motility parameters. , 2014, Biomedical optics express.

[16]  Zeev Zalevsky,et al.  Spatially-multiplexed interferometric microscopy (SMIM): converting a standard microscope into a holographic one. , 2014, Optics express.

[17]  Bahram Javidi,et al.  Flipping interferometry and its application for quantitative phase microscopy in a micro-channel. , 2016, Optics letters.

[18]  Pasquale Memmolo,et al.  Holographic imaging of unlabelled sperm cells for semen analysis: a review , 2014, Journal of biophotonics.

[19]  L. Gianaroli,et al.  Sperm head's birefringence: a new criterion for sperm selection. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[20]  Natan T. Shaked,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Biological Cells Using Digital Holographic Microscopy , 2011 .

[21]  P Memmolo,et al.  Digital holography as a method for 3D imaging and estimating the biovolume of motile cells. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[22]  P. Cohen-Bacrie,et al.  Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) , 2011 .

[23]  Gufeng Wang,et al.  Detecting and tracking nonfluorescent nanoparticle probes in live cells. , 2012, Methods in enzymology.

[24]  Pinhas Girshovitz,et al.  Interferometric phase microscopy for label-free morphological evaluation of sperm cells. , 2015, Fertility and sterility.

[25]  Howard A. Zacur,et al.  FEMALE INFERTILITYAND ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE ( Y ZHAO , SECTION EDITOR ) Recent Advances in Assisted Reproductive Technology , 2012 .

[26]  Frank Barnes,et al.  Equipment and general technical aspects of micromanipulation of gametes and embryos , 2008 .

[27]  A Berkovitz,et al.  How to improve IVF-ICSI outcome by sperm selection. , 2006, Reproductive biomedicine online.