Learner-Controlled Practice Difficulty and Task Exploration in an Active-Learning Gaming Environment

Background. With the use of computer-based simulations and games becoming increasingly common in education and organizational contexts for delivering training and instruction, learners are being granted unprecedented control over their learning. This increase in learner control leaves large differences in how learners challenge themselves and explore their learning environments. Learners can benefit from task difficulty, an aspect of challenge, when they are neither overwhelmed nor underwhelmed. The purpose of the present lab study was to test a model of how encouraging learners to challenge themselves with greater task difficulty when practicing a video game could be a “double-edged sword” in terms of their skill-based learning. Method. Using a first-person shooter computer game as the criterion task, 120 undergraduate males were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Half of the participants were encouraged to practice at a difficulty level that matched their skill level, while the other half were encouraged to practice at a difficulty that greatly exceeded their skill. Exploratory behavior was reflected in the variety of weapons used. Results. Findings supported a model of inconsistent mediation predicting that difficulty encouragement instructions would lead to higher selected practice difficulty, which in turn would have positive direct effects on skill transfer yet negative indirect effects through exploratory behavior. Discussion. The present study demonstrated that encouraging learners to practice at high levels of task difficulty is a “double-edged sword.” Although high levels of task difficulty can help in the preparation for future difficulties, it can also undermine exploratory behavior which is an important aspect of the learning process. This research speaks to the potential of encouraging learners to practice under difficult conditions without undermining their learning.

[1]  M. Frese,et al.  Action errors, error management, and learning in organizations. , 2015, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  Richard N. Landers,et al.  Gamification of Employee Training and Development , 2018 .

[3]  Gary C. Brown,et al.  Comparative effectiveness , 2009, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[4]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds , 2005 .

[5]  Andreas Schneider,et al.  “What’s Coming Next?” Epistemic Curiosity and Lurking Behavior in Online Communities , 2012 .

[6]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[7]  Catherine E. Overson,et al.  Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum , 2014 .

[8]  Dong-Mo Koo,et al.  Knowledge search and people with high epistemic curiosity , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Eleanor M. Smith,et al.  Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer , 1998 .

[10]  Jordan Litman Interest and deprivation factors of epistemic curiosity , 2008 .

[11]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition , 1989 .

[12]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[13]  R. Bjork,et al.  Learning Versus Performance , 2013, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[14]  Dietrich Doerner,et al.  On the Difficulties People Have in Dealing With Complexity , 1980 .

[15]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Individual and Team Skill Decay : The Science and Implications for Practice , 2013 .

[16]  Toby Hopp,et al.  Examination of the Relationship Between Gender, Performance, and Enjoyment of a First-Person Shooter Game , 2017 .

[17]  R. Wood Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[18]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  When and why introducing difficulties and errors can enhance instruction. , 2014 .

[19]  Craig M. Reddock,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Objective Learner Control in Web-based Instruction , 2016, Journal of Business and Psychology.

[20]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Toward a Taxonomy Linking Game Attributes to Learning , 2012 .

[21]  D. Berlyne Conflict, arousal, and curiosity , 2014 .

[22]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[23]  R. Bjork Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. , 1994 .

[24]  Kara L. Orvis,et al.  Relationships Between Game Attributes and Learning Outcomes , 2009 .

[25]  Jay H. Hardy,et al.  Exploratory behavior in active learning: : A between- and within-person examination , 2014 .

[26]  Christoph Klimmt,et al.  Gender and Computer Games: Exploring Females' Dislikes , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  Jay H. Hardy,et al.  Exploration-exploitation tradeoffs and information-knowledge gaps in self-regulated learning: Implications for learner-controlled training and development , 2019, Human Resource Management Review.

[28]  E. Bjork,et al.  Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. , 2011 .

[29]  Traci Sitzmann A META-ANALYTIC EXAMINATION OF THE INSTRUCTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPUTER-BASED SIMULATION GAMES , 2011 .

[30]  G. Loewenstein The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. , 1994 .

[31]  M. Csíkszentmihályi The domain of creativity. , 1990 .

[32]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Steering user behavior with badges , 2013, WWW.

[33]  Clint A. Bowers,et al.  Development of Game-Based Training Systems: Lessons Learned in an Inter-Disciplinary Field in the Making , 2010 .

[34]  Robert A. Wisher,et al.  THE COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF WEB-BASED AND CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION: , 2006 .

[35]  Michael Frese,et al.  Error training: Replication and the function of exploratory behavior , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[36]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Research-Based Solutions to Three Problems in Web-Based Training , 2009 .

[37]  Lauren N. Harkrider,et al.  Learner-controlled practice difficulty in the training of a complex task: cognitive and motivational mechanisms. , 2013, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  D. Berlyne Curiosity and exploration. , 1966, Science.

[39]  P. Silvia,et al.  The Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II: Development, Factor Structure, and Psychometrics. , 2009, Journal of research in personality.

[40]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Active learning: effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  "What's coming next?" Epistemic curiosity and lurking behavior in online communities , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  B Hesketh,et al.  Learning from errors in a driving simulation: effects on driving skill and self-confidence , 2000, Ergonomics.

[43]  Traci Sitzmann,et al.  A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: what we know and where we need to go. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  Christian C. P. Wolff,et al.  Encouraging Active Learning , 2014 .

[45]  Amela Sadagic Deconstructing Game-based Systems: What are They? What Really Matters? , 2010 .

[46]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[47]  David P. MacKinnon,et al.  Current Directions in Mediation Analysis , 2009, Current directions in psychological science.