PPROC, an ontology for transparency in public procurement

Public procurement or tendering refers to the process followed by public authorities for the procurement of goods and services. In most developed countries, the law requires public authorities to provide online information to ensure competitive tendering as far as possible, for which the adequate announcement of tenders is an essential requirement. In addition, transparency laws being proposed in such countries are making the monitoring of public contracts by citizens a fundamental right. This paper describes the PPROC ontology, which has been developed to give support to both processes, publication and accountability, by semantically describing public procurement processes and contracts. The PPROC ontology is extensive, since it covers not only the usual data about the tender, its objectives, deadlines and awardees, but also details of the whole process, from the initial contract publication to its termination. This makes it possible to use the ontology for both open data publication purposes and for the overall management of the public contract procurement process.

[1]  N. Maccormick Norms, Institutions, and Institutional Facts , 1998 .

[2]  N. F. Noy,et al.  Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology , 2001 .

[3]  Michael Gruninger,et al.  Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies , 1995, IJCAI 1995.

[4]  Martin Necaský,et al.  Procurement notice enrichment using product ontologies , 2015, SEMANTICS.

[5]  Milovanović Miloš,et al.  Semantic technologies on the mission: Preventing corruption in public procurement , 2014 .

[6]  Martin Necaský,et al.  Linked data support for filing public contracts , 2014, Comput. Ind..

[7]  T. D. Noia,et al.  LOTED : Exploiting Linked Data in Analyzing European Procurement Notices , 2010 .

[8]  Jose María Álvarez Rodríguez,et al.  Towards a Pan-European E-Procurement Platform to Aggregate, Publish and Search Public Procurement Notices Powered by Linked Open Data: the Moldeas Approach , 2012, Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng..

[9]  Giovanni Sartor,et al.  The Legal Theory Perspective: Doctrinal Conceptual Systems vs. Computational Ontologies , 2011, Approaches to Legal Ontologies.

[10]  Guillermo Esteban,et al.  Using the Semantic Web for the Integration and Publication of Public Procurement Data , 2015, EGOVIS.

[11]  Enrico Motta,et al.  LOTED2: An ontology of European public procurement notices , 2016, Semantic Web.

[12]  Martin Hepp,et al.  GoodRelations: An Ontology for Describing Products and Services Offers on the Web , 2008, EKAW.

[13]  Giulia Venturi,et al.  When a FrameNet-Style Knowledge Description Meets an Ontological Characterization of Fundamental Legal Concepts , 2009, AICOL Workshops.

[14]  Dan Brickley,et al.  SKOS Core: Simple knowledge organisation for the Web , 2005, Dublin Core Conference.

[15]  John M. Ackerman,et al.  THE GLOBAL EXPLOSION OF FREEDOM OF INFORMATION LAWS , 2006 .

[16]  Patricia Ordóñez de Pablos,et al.  Empowering the access to public procurement opportunities by means of linking controlled vocabularies. A case study of Product Scheme Classifications in the European e-Procurement sector , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Patricia Ordóñez de Pablos,et al.  New trends on e-Procurement applying semantic technologies: Current status and future challenges , 2014, Comput. Ind..