Behavioural responsiveness of virtual users for students’ creative problem-finding in architectural design

ABSTRACT Previous theories have hypothesised that the behavioural responsiveness of autonomous, anthropomorphic computer-agents of virtual users (VUsers) influences designers’ creative problem-finding in architectural design; however, this assumption has not yet been investigated. To examine this hypothesis, the present study compared the presence and non-presence of VUsers and used responsive and non-responsive VUsers in students’ authentic problem-finding. Statistical analyses based on the students’ self-assessments revealed that: (1) the presence of VUsers better facilitates the discovery of more unexpected and functional design solutions, as well as more evaluations of the usability and values of design solutions, including users’ safety and comfort, than the non-presence of VUsers; (2) VUsers’ responsive behaviours facilitated the discovery of more unexpected and physical functions of design solutions, as well as more evaluations of users’ safety and comfort, than non-responsive VUser behaviours; and (3) when the behavioural details were not distinctive, the evaluation scores were indifferent.

[1]  Davide Schaumann,et al.  Modelling and Simulating Use Processes in Buildings , 2013 .

[2]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Virtual Crowds: Steps Toward Behavioral Realism , 2015, Virtual Crowds: Steps Toward Behavioral Realism.

[3]  Alex T. Anderson.  On the Human Figure in Architectural Representation , 2002 .

[4]  M. Lorenzen.  Creativity in context : Content, cost, chance and collection in the organization of the film industry , 2009 .

[5]  Jim Blascovich,et al.  A theoretical model of social influence for increasing the utility of collaborative virtual environments , 2002, CVE '02.

[6]  Harry Gifford.  Crowd Simulation , 2013 .

[7]  Seung Wan Hong,et al.  The Effects of Human Behavior Simulation on Architecture Major Students′ Fire Egress Planning , 2018 .

[8]  Anders Ekholm,et al.  Modelling of User Activities in Building Design , 2001, eCAADe proceedings.

[9]  Rob Imrie,et al.  Architects' Conceptions of the Human Body , 2003 .

[10]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Simulating Crowds in Egress Scenarios , 2017, Springer International Publishing.

[11]  Margaret A. Boden,et al.  Creativity and Art: Three Roads to Surprise , 2010 .

[12]  M. Runco.  Creativity: Theories and Themes: Research, Development, and Practice , 2006 .

[13]  Susannah B. F. Paletz,et al.  Problem Finding and Contradiction: Examining the Relationship Between Naive Dialectical Thinking, Ethnicity, and Creativity , 2009 .

[14]  Marco Frascari.  The Body and Architecture in the Drawings of Carlo Scarpa , 1987, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics.

[15]  Hung-Chang Lin,et al.  Effects of 3D CAD applications on the design creativity of students with different representational abilities , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  Seung-Wan Hong,et al.  A Study on the Effectiveness of Using Human Behavior Representation on Creative Motivation in Architectural Design Process , 2014 .

[17]  Davide Schaumann,et al.  Human behavior simulation in architectural design projects: An observational study in an academic course , 2016, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[18]  Stephan K. Chalup,et al.  Architectural evaluation of simulated pedestrian spatial behaviour , 2011 .