Expectations and Preferences in British General Elections

T A Te address two questions: How do people form their expectations about the likely winner of the next general election? and What are the links between expectations and votes? Using V v data collected by the Gallup organization in Great Britain, we find that the expectations formation process (1) has a significant inertia component but also a rapid adjustment to current information; (2) reflects voters' ability to translate economic expectations into political forecasts; and (3) is "time-bounded," possessing special characteristics immediately before and after a general election. The analysis also confirms the existence of a small bandwagon effect, whereby expectations that one party will win inflate that party's vote. The ability of voters to make reasonable forecasts without being unduly influenced by their own preferences suggests that under normal circumstances voters are expressing real preferences and not simply following the crowd.

[1]  William L. Miller,et al.  The Electoral Cycle and the Asymmetry of Government and Opposition Popularity: An Alternative Model of the Relationship between Economic Conditions and Political Popularity , 1973 .

[2]  Charles W. Ostrom,et al.  Error Correction, Attitude Persistence, and Executive Rewards and Punishments: A Behavioral Theory of Presidential Approval , 1992, Political Analysis.

[3]  J. Alt.  The politics of economic decline , 1979 .

[4]  D. Begg.  The rational expectations revolution in macroeconomics: Theories and evidence , 1982 .

[5]  M. Lewis-Beck,et al.  Citizen Forecasting: Can Voters See into the Future? , 1989, British Journal of Political Science.

[6]  H. Clarke,et al.  Politics, Economics and Party Popularity in Britain, 1979-83 , 1986 .

[7]  G. Shaw.  Rational Expectations: An Elementary Exposition , 1984 .

[8]  The Relationship Between Government Popularity and Approval for the Government's Record in the United Kingdom , 1985 .

[9]  H. Theil.  Introduction to econometrics , 1978 .

[10]  C. A. Pissarides.  British government popularity and economic performance , 1980 .

[11]  Larry M. Bartels.  Candidate Choice and the Dynamics of the Presidential Nominating Process , 1987 .

[12]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  “Sophisticated” Voting in the 1988 Presidential Primaries , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[13]  Franklin M. Fisher,et al.  The identification problem in econometrics , 1967 .

[14]  Harold D. Clarke,et al.  Recapturing the Falklands: Models of Conservative Popularity, 1979–83 , 1990, British Journal of Political Science.

[15]  B. Frey,et al.  A Politico-Economic Model of the United Kingdom , 1978 .

[16]  I. McAllister,et al.  Party Leaders and Election Outcomes in Britain, 1974-1983 , 1987 .

[17]  Adrian Pagan,et al.  Two Stage and Related Estimators and Their Applications , 1986 .

[18]  L. Robert.  Some International Evidence on Output-Inflation Tradeoffs. , 1973 .

[19]  Gerald H. Kramer,et al.  The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate- versus Individual-level Findings on Economics and Elections, and Sociotropic Voting , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[20]  H. Norpoth.  The Falklands war and government popularity in Britain: Rally without consequence or surge without decline? , 1987 .

[21]  D. Peel,et al.  What Can Economics Learn from Political Science, and Vice Versa? , 1986 .

[22]  Christopher H. Achen.  The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments , 2023 .

[23]  Ian McAllister,et al.  Bandwagon, Underdog, or Projection? Opinion Polls and Electoral Choice in Britain, 1979-1987 , 1991, The Journal of Politics.

[24]  Thomas J. Sargent,et al.  "Rational" Expectations, the Optimal Monetary Instrument, and the Optimal Money Supply Rule , 1975, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  David M. Grether,et al.  Analysis of Economic Time Series. A Synthesis. , 1980 .

[26]  W. Mishler,et al.  British Parties in the Balance: A Time-Series Analysis of Long-Term Trends in Labour and Conservative Support , 1989, British Journal of Political Science.

[27]  R. Niemi,et al.  Constituency Characteristics, Individual Characteristics and Tactical Voting in the 1987 British General Election , 1992, British Journal of Political Science.

[28]  D. Hibbs,et al.  On the Demand for Economic Outcomes: Macroeconomic Performance and Mass Political Support in the United States, Great Britain, and Germany , 1982, The Journal of Politics.

[29]  M. Lewis-Beck.  Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies , 1988 .

[30]  Jim Granato.  An Agenda For Econometric Model Building , 1991, Political Analysis.

[31]  P. Mosley.  ‘Popularity Functions’ and the Role of the Media: A Pilot Study of the Popular Press , 1984, British Journal of Political Science.

[32]  D. Butler,et al.  British political facts, 1900-1975 , 1975 .

[33]  H. Norpoth.  Guns and Butter and Government Popularity in Britain , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[34]  D. Rivers,et al.  A retrospective on retrospective voting , 1984 .

[35]  M. Peffley.  The voter as juror: Attributing responsibility for economic conditions , 1984 .

[36]  H. Clarke,et al.  Dealignment of Degree: Partisan Change in Britain, 1974-83 , 1984, The Journal of Politics.

[37]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[38]  Andrew Skalaban,et al.  Do the polls affect elections? Some 1980 evidence , 1988 .

[39]  D. Butler,et al.  British Political Facts , 1975 .

[40]  Adrian Pagan,et al.  Econometric Issues in the Analysis of Regressions with Generated Regressors. , 1984 .

[41]  Henry W. Chappell,et al.  A New View of Political Accountability for Economic Performance , 1985, American Political Science Review.