The development and implementation of the national evaluation strategy of Access to Care, a multi-site linkage to care initiative in the United States.

The Access to Care (A2C) is a multi-site initiative that seeks to increase the access to and retention in effective HIV healthcare and support services by people living with HIV across the United States. As the initiative implemented evidence-based programs in new settings with diverse populations, it was important to document these innovative efforts to contribute to the evidence base for best practices. In a partnership between Johns Hopkins University, AIDS United, and the A2C sites, a national evaluation strategy was developed and implemented to build knowledge about how linkage to care interventions could be most effectively implemented within the context of local, real-world settings. This article provides an overview of the efforts to develop and implement a national monitoring and evaluation strategy for a multi-site initiative. The findings may be of utility for other HIV interventions that are seeking to incorporate a monitoring and evaluation component into their efforts.

[1]  David R. Holtgrave,et al.  Cost-Utility Analysis of Three U.S. HIV Linkage and Re-engagement in Care Programs from Positive Charge , 2016, AIDS and Behavior.

[2]  David R. Holtgrave,et al.  Unpacking Linkage and Reengagement in HIV Care: A Day in the Life of a Positive Charge Care Coordinator. , 2015, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.

[3]  M. Hogben,et al.  HIV Testing and HIV Service Delivery to Populations at High Risk Attending Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinics in the United States, 2011-2013. , 2015, American journal of public health.

[4]  David R. Holtgrave,et al.  Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Access to HIV Care Interventions: A Qualitative Analysis of the Positive Charge Initiative. , 2015, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.

[5]  H. Wolfe,et al.  Behavioral Intervention Improves Treatment Outcomes Among HIV-Infected Individuals Who Have Delayed, Declined, or Discontinued Antiretroviral Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Novel Intervention , 2015, AIDS and Behavior.

[6]  David R. Holtgrave,et al.  Positive Charge: Filling the Gaps in the U.S. HIV Continuum of Care , 2015, AIDS and Behavior.

[7]  David R. Holtgrave Development of Year 2020 Goals for the National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States , 2014, AIDS and Behavior.

[8]  David R. Holtgrave,et al.  Differences in human immunodeficiency virus care and treatment among subpopulations in the United States. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[9]  G. Marks,et al.  Interventions to Promote Linkage to and Utilization of HIV Medical Care Among HIV-diagnosed Persons: A Qualitative Systematic Review, 1996–2011 , 2013, AIDS and Behavior.

[10]  G. Marks,et al.  Interventions to Improve Retention in HIV Primary Care: A Systematic Review of U.S. Studies , 2012, Current HIV/AIDS Reports.

[11]  J. Kavookjian,et al.  Motivational interviewing as a behavioral intervention to increase HAART adherence in patients who are HIV-positive: A systematic review of the literature , 2012, AIDS care.

[12]  Carlos Del Rio,et al.  The spectrum of engagement in HIV care and its relevance to test-and-treat strategies for prevention of HIV infection. , 2011, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[13]  Richard D Moore,et al.  Late presentation for human immunodeficiency virus care in the United States and Canada. , 2010, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[14]  M. Tyndall,et al.  Piloting a peer-driven intervention model to increase access and adherence to antiretroviral therapy and HIV care among street-entrenched HIV-positive women in Vancouver. , 2009, AIDS patient care and STDs.

[15]  K. Lohr,et al.  Outcomes of community health worker interventions. , 2009, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[16]  J. Willig,et al.  The therapeutic implications of timely linkage and early retention in HIV care. , 2009, AIDS patient care and STDs.

[17]  G. Ryan,et al.  Characteristics of the original patient navigation programs to reduce disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer , 2008, Cancer.

[18]  G. Marks,et al.  Factors associated with use of HIV primary care among persons recently diagnosed with HIV: Examination of variables from the behavioural model of health-care utilization , 2007, AIDS care.

[19]  J. Parsons,et al.  Characteristics of HIV antiretroviral treatments, access and adherence in an ethnically diverse sample of men who have sex with men , 2003, AIDS care.

[20]  D. Abramson,et al.  The impact of ancillary HIV services on engagement in medical care in New York City , 2002, AIDS care.

[21]  F. Mostashari,et al.  Trust and the Acceptance of and Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy , 2001, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[22]  F. Mostashari,et al.  Acceptance and adherence with antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected women in a correctional facility. , 1998, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes and human retrovirology : official publication of the International Retrovirology Association.

[23]  David R. Holtgrave,et al.  Handbook of Economic Evaluation of HIV Prevention Programs , 1998, AIDS Prevention and Mental Health.