Simulation of Forced Expiration in a Biophysical Model, With Homogeneous and Clustered Bronchoconstriction.

One limitation of forced spirometry is that it integrates the contribution of the complex and dynamic behavior of all of the airways and tissue of the lung into a single exhaling unit, hence, it is not clear how spirometric measures are affected by local changes to the airways or tissue such as the presence of "ventilation defects." Here, we adapt a wave-speed limitation model to a spatially distributed and anatomically based airway tree that is embedded within a deformable parenchyma, to simulate forced expiration in 1 s (FEV1). This provides a model that can be used to assess the consequence of imposed constrictions on FEV1. We first show how the model can be parameterized to represent imaging and forced spirometry data from nonasthmatic healthy young adults. We then compare the effect of homogeneous and clustered bronchoconstriction on FEV1 in six subject-specific models (three male and three female). The model highlights potential sources of normal subject variability in response to agonist challenge, including the interaction between sites of airway constriction and sites of flow limitation at baseline. The results support earlier studies which proposed that the significant constriction of nondefect airways must be present in order to match to clinical measurements of lung function.

[1]  Geoffrey McLennan,et al.  CT-based geometry analysis and finite element models of the human and ovine bronchial tree. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[2]  J L Hankinson,et al.  Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. , 1999, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[3]  J Pardaens,et al.  [A physical model of expiration]. , 1972, Journal de physiologie.

[4]  D E Olson,et al.  Models of the human bronchial tree. , 1971, Journal of applied physiology.

[5]  R C Schroter,et al.  Flow patterns in models of the human bronchial airways. , 1969, Respiration physiology.

[6]  John P Mugler,et al.  Evaluation of asthma with hyperpolarized helium-3 MRI: correlation with clinical severity and spirometry. , 2006, Chest.

[7]  J J Fredberg,et al.  Interdependent regional lung emptying during forced expiration: a transistor model. , 1987, Journal of applied physiology.

[8]  S V Dawson,et al.  Wave-speed limitation on expiratory flow-a unifying concept. , 1977, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[9]  Timothy J. Pedley,et al.  Pulmonary Fluid Dynamics , 1977 .

[10]  G. Maksym,et al.  Regional pulmonary response to a methacholine challenge using hyperpolarized 3He magnetic resonance imaging , 2012, Respirology.

[11]  J. Hankinson,et al.  Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. , 2000, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[12]  E. Bleecker,et al.  International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma , 2013, European Respiratory Journal.

[13]  A. G. Polak,et al.  A forward model for maximum expiration , 1998, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[14]  Kenneth Lutchen,et al.  The difference in ventilation heterogeneity between asthmatic and healthy subjects quantified using hyperpolarized 3He MRI. , 2009, Journal of applied physiology.

[15]  E. Hoffman,et al.  A multivariate analysis of risk factors for the air-trapping asthmatic phenotype as measured by quantitative CT analysis. , 2009, Chest.

[16]  J. Smith,et al.  The mechanics of airway closure , 2008, Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology.

[17]  Eric A Hoffman,et al.  Supine and prone differences in regional lung density and pleural pressure gradients in the human lung with constant shape. , 2009, Journal of applied physiology.

[18]  E. Weibel Morphometry of the Human Lung , 1965, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[19]  T A Wilson,et al.  A computational model for expiratory flow. , 1982, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[20]  Eric A. Hoffman,et al.  Relating indices of inert gas washout to localised bronchoconstriction , 2012, Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology.

[21]  O Barnea,et al.  Maximum expiratory flow-volume curve: mathematical model and experimental results. , 1995, Medical engineering & physics.

[22]  K. Beck,et al.  Impedance, gas mixing, and bimodal ventilation in constricted lungs. , 2003, Journal of applied physiology.

[23]  Merryn Tawhai,et al.  Identifying airways responsible for heterogeneous ventilation and mechanical dysfunction in asthma: an image functional modeling approach. , 2005, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  Tilo Winkler,et al.  Self-organized patchiness in asthma as a prelude to catastrophic shifts , 2005, Nature.

[25]  D. Reynolds,et al.  Steady pressure-flow relationship of a model of the canine bronchial tree. , 1981, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[26]  J. Hankinson,et al.  Standardisation of spirometry , 2005, European Respiratory Journal.

[27]  M C Hart,et al.  Relation between anatomic respiratory dead space and body size and lung volume , 1963, Journal of applied physiology.

[28]  T. Similowski,et al.  The best peak expiratory flow is flow-limited and effort-independent in normal subjects. , 2002, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[29]  A. G. Polak,et al.  Computational Model for Forced Expiration from Asymmetric Normal Lungs , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  G. Tzelepis,et al.  Expiratory effort enhancement and peak expiratory flow in humans , 2005, European Journal of Applied Physiology.