Distinct differences in cortical reactivity of motor and prefrontal cortices to magnetic stimulation

OBJECTIVE The stimulus intensity of prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is usually determined with respect to the motor threshold (MT). However, the association between the excitability of the prefrontal and motor cortices is unknown. METHODS Magnetic pulses to the left motor and prefrontal cortices were delivered at the MT of the right abductor digiti minimi muscle for 9 subjects and at 4 different stimulus intensities (60, 80, 100, and 120% of MT) for two subjects. Simultaneously, EEG was recorded with 60 scalp electrodes. RESULTS Global mean field amplitudes of the TMS-evoked responses were significantly (32%) smaller after prefrontal than after motor cortex TMS, but they correlated positively. CONCLUSIONS The reactivity to TMS is different between the motor and prefrontal cortices. However, an association between these reactivities suggests that MT may be used for determining the stimulus intensity of prefrontal TMS.

[1]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[2]  R. J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Instrumentation for the measurement of electric brain responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[3]  Ziad Nahas,et al.  A combined TMS/fMRI study of intensity-dependent TMS over motor cortex , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[4]  S Kähkönen,et al.  The functional connectivity of the prefrontal cortex studied by combined TMS with EEG , 2001 .

[5]  M Hallett,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a tool for mapping the central nervous system. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[6]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Neuronal responses to magnetic stimulation reveal cortical reactivity and connectivity , 1997, Neuroreport.

[7]  Seppo Kähkönen,et al.  Alcohol Reduces Prefrontal Cortical Excitability in Humans: A Combined TMS and EEG Study , 2003, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[8]  Mark S. George,et al.  Prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) changes relative perfusion locally and remotely , 1999 .

[9]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Separation of contamination caused by coil clicks from responses elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  J Starck,et al.  The noise level in magnetic stimulation. , 1996, Scandinavian audiology.

[11]  V. Nikouline,et al.  The role of the coil click in TMS assessed with simultaneous EEG , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  V E Amassian,et al.  An analysis of the activation of motor cortical neurons by surface stimulation. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  R. J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Ethanol Modulates Cortical Activity: Direct Evidence with Combined TMS and EEG , 2000, NeuroImage.

[14]  J. Lorberbaum,et al.  The transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold depends on the distance from coil to underlying cortex: a replication in healthy adults comparing two methods of assessing the distance to cortex , 2001, Biological Psychiatry.

[15]  A. Barker An Introduction to the Basic Principles of Magnetic Nerve Stimulation , 1991, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[16]  S. Schultz Principles of Neural Science, 4th ed. , 2001 .

[17]  J. Lorberbaum,et al.  Unilateral left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) produces intensity-dependent bilateral effects as measured by interleaved BOLD fMRI , 2001, Biological Psychiatry.

[18]  M I Mendel,et al.  Audiometric comparison of the middle and late components of the adult auditory evoked potentials awake and asleep. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  J. Lorberbaum,et al.  How coil-cortex distance relates to age, motor threshold, and antidepressant response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2000, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[20]  Henrik Foltys,et al.  Visual and motor cortex excitability: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  Sauli Savolainen,et al.  Ipsi- and contralateral EEG reactions to transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.