SARS‐CoV‐2 NSP8 suppresses type I and III IFN responses by modulating the RIG‐I/MDA5, TRIF, and STING signaling pathways

SARS‐CoV‐2 has developed a variety of approaches to counteract host innate antiviral immunity to facilitate its infection, replication and pathogenesis, but the molecular mechanisms that it employs are still not been fully understood. Here, we found that SARS‐CoV‐2 NSP8 inhibited the production of type I and III interferons (IFNs) by acting on RIG‐I/MDA5 and the signaling molecules TRIF and STING. Overexpression of NSP8 downregulated the expression of type I and III IFNs stimulated by poly (I:C) transfection and infection with SeV and SARS‐CoV‐2. In addition, NSP8 impaired IFN expression triggered by overexpression of the signaling molecules RIG‐I, MDA5, and MAVS, instead of TBK1 and IRF3‐5D, an active form of IRF3. From a mechanistic view, NSP8 interacts with RIG‐I and MDA5, and thereby prevents the assembly of the RIG‐I/MDA5‐MAVS signalosome, resulting in the impaired phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of IRF3. NSP8 also suppressed the TRIF‐ and STING‐ induced IFN expression by directly interacting with them. Moreover, ectopic expression of NSP8 promoted virus replications. Taken together, SARS‐CoV‐2 NSP8 suppresses type I and III IFN responses by disturbing the RIG‐I/MDA5−MAVS complex formation and targeting TRIF and STING signaling transduction. These results provide new insights into the pathogenesis of COVID‐19.

[1]  Jia-Yu Pan,et al.  SARS‐CoV‐2 NSP7 inhibits type I and III IFN production by targeting the RIG‐I/MDA5, TRIF, and STING signaling pathways , 2023, Journal of medical virology.

[2]  E. Zúñiga,et al.  Interferon induction, evasion, and paradoxical roles during SARS‐CoV‐2 infection , 2022, Immunological reviews.

[3]  Wei Wang,et al.  SARS‐CoV‐2 ORF10 antagonizes STING‐dependent interferon activation and autophagy , 2022, Journal of medical virology.

[4]  M. Diamond,et al.  Innate immunity: the first line of defense against SARS-CoV-2 , 2022, Nature Immunology.

[5]  P. Zhan,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 NSP5 and N protein counteract the RIG-I signaling pathway by suppressing the formation of stress granules , 2022, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.

[6]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 impairs interferon production via NSP2-induced repression of mRNA translation , 2022, bioRxiv.

[7]  Vivek V. Thacker,et al.  The cGAS–STING pathway drives type I IFN immunopathology in COVID-19 , 2022, Nature.

[8]  H. Shan,et al.  TREM-2 is a sensor and activator of T cell response in SARS-CoV-2 infection , 2021, Science advances.

[9]  Hongbin He,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 ORF10 suppresses the antiviral innate immune response by degrading MAVS through mitophagy , 2021, Cellular & Molecular Immunology.

[10]  R. Hai,et al.  Devil's tools: SARS-CoV-2 antagonists against innate immunity , 2021, Current Research in Virological Science.

[11]  R. Singh,et al.  Role of toll‐like receptors in modulation of cytokine storm signaling in SARS‐CoV‐2‐induced COVID‐19 , 2021, Journal of medical virology.

[12]  Francisco J. Sánchez-Rivera,et al.  Replication and single-cycle delivery of SARS-CoV-2 replicons , 2021, Science.

[13]  Yuchen Liu,et al.  An antibody-based proximity labeling map reveals mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 inhibition of antiviral immunity , 2021, Cell Chemical Biology.

[14]  Jianhua Yu,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 Nsp5 Demonstrates Two Distinct Mechanisms Targeting RIG-I and MAVS To Evade the Innate Immune Response , 2021, mBio.

[15]  Adriana Forero,et al.  Mechanisms of Antiviral Immune Evasion of SARS-CoV-2 , 2021, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[16]  N. Rezaei,et al.  The role of type I interferon in the treatment of COVID‐19 , 2021, Journal of medical virology.

[17]  G. Moseley,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 suppresses IFNβ production mediated by NSP1, 5, 6, 15, ORF6 and ORF7b but does not suppress the effects of added interferon , 2021, PLoS pathogens.

[18]  S. Cherry,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins NSP1 and NSP13 inhibit interferon activation through distinct mechanisms , 2021, PloS one.

[19]  A. Fakhari,et al.  Interferon‐alpha position in combating with COVID‐19: A systematic review , 2021, Journal of medical virology.

[20]  M. Shi,et al.  A Convenient and Biosafe Replicon with Accessory Genes of SARS-CoV-2 and Its Potential Application in Antiviral Drug Discovery , 2021, Virologica Sinica.

[21]  I. Ulitsky,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 uses a multipronged strategy to impede host protein synthesis , 2021, Nature.

[22]  K. Conzelmann,et al.  Systematic functional analysis of SARS-CoV-2 proteins uncovers viral innate immune antagonists and remaining vulnerabilities , 2021, Cell Reports.

[23]  Joaquin Lopez-Orozco,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 Nonstructural Protein 1 Inhibits the Interferon Response by Causing Depletion of Key Host Signaling Factors , 2021, Journal of virology.

[24]  Michiel van Gent,et al.  ISG15-dependent activation of the sensor MDA5 is antagonized by the SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease to evade host innate immunity , 2021, Nature Microbiology.

[25]  Qi Dong,et al.  Unique and complementary suppression of cGAS-STING and RNA sensing- triggered innate immune responses by SARS-CoV-2 proteins , 2021, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.

[26]  L. Ren,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 nsp12 attenuates type I interferon production by inhibiting IRF3 nuclear translocation , 2021, Cellular & Molecular Immunology.

[27]  Zhengfan Jiang,et al.  Sensing of cytoplasmic chromatin by cGAS activates innate immune response in SARS-CoV-2 infection , 2021, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.

[28]  B. Ye,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 ORF9b inhibits RIG-I-MAVS antiviral signaling by interrupting K63-linked ubiquitination of NEMO , 2021, Cell Reports.

[29]  N. Rezaei,et al.  Role of Toll‐like receptors in the pathogenesis of COVID‐19 , 2021, Journal of medical virology.

[30]  S. Noronha,et al.  Mutations in SARS‐CoV‐2 nsp7 and nsp8 proteins and their predicted impact on replication/transcription complex structure , 2021, Journal of medical virology.

[31]  Dominic J. B. Hunter,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 proteases PLpro and 3CLpro cleave IRF3 and critical modulators of inflammatory pathways (NLRP12 and TAB1): implications for disease presentation across species , 2020, Emerging microbes & infections.

[32]  Jiaxing Zhang,et al.  A novel cell culture system modeling the SARS-CoV-2 life cycle , 2020, bioRxiv.

[33]  Yan-Yi Wang,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 membrane glycoprotein M antagonizes the MAVS-mediated innate antiviral response , 2020, Cellular & Molecular Immunology.

[34]  Jincun Zhao,et al.  Main protease of SARS-CoV-2 serves as a bifunctional molecule in restricting type I interferon antiviral signaling , 2020, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.

[35]  Vineet D. Menachery,et al.  Evasion of Type I Interferon by SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Cell Reports.

[36]  M. Fukushi,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 ORF3b Is a Potent Interferon Antagonist Whose Activity Is Increased by a Naturally Occurring Elongation Variant , 2020, Cell Reports.

[37]  Peihui Wang,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 ORF9b Antagonizes Type I and III Interferons by Targeting Multiple Components of RIG-I/MDA-5-MAVS, TLR3-TRIF, and cGAS-STING Signaling Pathways , 2020, bioRxiv.

[38]  Peihui Wang,et al.  Suppression of MDA5-mediated antiviral immune responses by NSP8 of SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, bioRxiv.

[39]  S. Teng,et al.  A systemic and molecular study of subcellular localization of SARS-CoV-2 proteins , 2020, bioRxiv.

[40]  L. Ren,et al.  Activation and evasion of type I interferon responses by SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Nature Communications.

[41]  G. Hummer,et al.  Papain-like protease regulates SARS-CoV-2 viral spread and innate immunity , 2020, Nature.

[42]  Peihui Wang,et al.  Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) membrane (M) protein inhibits type I and III interferon production by targeting RIG-I/MDA-5 signaling , 2020, bioRxiv.

[43]  Nicolas Carlier,et al.  Impaired type I interferon activity and inflammatory responses in severe COVID-19 patients , 2020, Science.

[44]  Rui Luo,et al.  The ORF6, ORF8 and nucleocapsid proteins of SARS-CoV-2 inhibit type I interferon signaling pathway , 2020, Virus Research.

[45]  R. Schwartz,et al.  Imbalanced Host Response to SARS-CoV-2 Drives Development of COVID-19 , 2020, Cell.

[46]  Hyeshik Chang,et al.  The Architecture of SARS-CoV-2 Transcriptome , 2020, Cell.

[47]  K. Yuen,et al.  Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[48]  Zunyou Wu,et al.  Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. , 2020, JAMA.

[49]  E. Holmes,et al.  Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding , 2020, The Lancet.

[50]  Tiantian Han,et al.  Coronavirus infections and immune responses , 2020, Journal of medical virology.

[51]  G. Gao,et al.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019 , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[52]  Qianyun Liu,et al.  Emerging coronaviruses: Genome structure, replication, and pathogenesis , 2020, Journal of medical virology.

[53]  K. To,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 nsp13, nsp14, nsp15 and orf6 function as potent interferon antagonists , 2020, Emerging microbes & infections.

[54]  M. A. O. Ignacio,et al.  How to cite this article , 2016 .

[55]  N. Grishin,et al.  Phosphorylation of innate immune adaptor proteins MAVS, STING, and TRIF induces IRF3 activation , 2015, Science.