An initial evaluation framework for the design and operational use of maritime STAMP-based safety management systems

A safety management system (SMS) is the common means used by organizations to assess organizational performance with respect to the safety and well-being of people, property and the natural ecosystem. A SMS provides confidence to diverse stakeholders that organizational safety is at an appropriate level and fulfils the applicable regulatory standards. As a multifaceted system for organizational safety assessment, ensurance and assurance, the evaluation of the design and operational use of SMS is a complex process. An evaluation needs to provide evidence about how well the design and operation of an SMS complies with applicable standards and how well the methods used in the SMS implementation support the organizational policies and practical work. In the maritime domain, SMS is broadly applied. However, there are few theoretically rooted SMS design approaches, and there is a lack of frameworks to evaluate how well the SMS is designed and how effectively it operates. This paper proposes an initial evaluation framework for the design and operational use of a maritime SMS design approach based on Systems-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP), realist evaluation and Bayesian Networks. This framework is applied for a case study of vessel traffic services (VTS) Finland to test its relevance and ability to guide the SMS design. The experiences gained in the case study, and the related discussion on the framework, can guide further research in this area. Ultimately, the work can be used as a basis for developing maritime SMS auditing processes, based on specific theoretical and methodological approaches.

[1]  A M Stoddard,et al.  Assessing and intervening on OSH programmes: effectiveness evaluation of the Wellworks-2 intervention in 15 manufacturing worksites , 2004, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[3]  A. Pantouvakis,et al.  An empirical assessment of ISM Code effectiveness on performance: the role of ISO certification , 2016 .

[4]  Syamantak Bhattacharya The effectiveness of the ISM Code: A qualitative enquiry , 2012 .

[5]  Bjørn-Morten Batalden,et al.  AUDITING IN THE MARITIME INDUSTRY: A CASE STUDY OF THE OFFSHORE SUPPORT VESSEL SEGMENT , 2015 .

[6]  Nick Tilley,et al.  An introduction to scientific realist evaluation , 1997 .

[7]  James I. Chang,et al.  Performance evaluation of process safety management systems of paint manufacturing facilities , 2009 .

[8]  I. Mayer,et al.  Perspectives on Policy Analysis: A Framework for Understanding and Design , 2004 .

[9]  Kerrie L. Mengersen,et al.  A proposed validation framework for expert elicited Bayesian Networks , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Jouni Lappalainen Finnish Maritime Personnel's Conceptions on Safety Management and Safety Culture , 2016 .

[11]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  Handbook of Safety Principles , 2017 .

[12]  Frank W. Guldenmund,et al.  Safety management systems: A broad overview of the literature , 2018 .

[13]  Andrew Hale,et al.  Foundations of safety science: A postscript , 2014 .

[14]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety , 2012 .

[15]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  A method for extracting key performance indicators from maritime safety management norms , 2016 .

[16]  D. Rae Risk and Safety Indicators , 2018 .

[17]  Terje Aven,et al.  What is safety science , 2014 .

[18]  Yvan Allaire,et al.  Theories of Organizational Culture , 1984 .

[19]  Ernestos Tzannatos,et al.  Analysis of accidents in Greek shipping during the pre- and post-ISM period , 2009 .

[20]  John McDermid,et al.  Fixing the cracks in the crystal ball: A maturity model for quantitative risk assessment , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[21]  Nigel Bevan,et al.  Quality in use: Meeting user needs for quality , 1999, J. Syst. Softw..

[22]  Andrew Rae,et al.  Safety work versus the safety of work , 2019, Safety Science.

[23]  Maria Karakasnaki,et al.  ISM Code implementation: an investigation of safety issues in the shipping industry , 2018 .

[24]  Beatriz Fernández-Muñiz,et al.  Safety management system: Development and validation of a multidimensional scale , 2007 .

[25]  Jenni Kuronen,et al.  Evaluation of the Ism Code in the Finnish Shipping Companies , 2012 .

[26]  G. A. Blackmore Safety Management Systems - The Next Steps? , 1996 .

[27]  E. Rosa The Social Amplification of Risk: The logical structure of the social amplification of risk framework (SARF): Meta theoretical foundations and policy implications , 2003 .

[28]  Teemu Reiman,et al.  Does the concept of safety culture help or hinder systems thinking in safety? , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Zahid H. Qureshi,et al.  A review of accident modelling approaches for complex socio-technical systems , 2007 .

[30]  Corinne Bieder,et al.  Trapping Safety into Rules: How Desirable or Avoidable is Proceduralization? , 2013 .

[32]  H Oltedal,et al.  The use of safety management systems within the Norwegian tanker industry - Do they really improve safety? , 2009 .

[33]  Richard Clewley,et al.  Trapping safety into rules: how desirable or avoidable is proceduralization? , 2013 .

[34]  Christopher Nemeth,et al.  Remaining sensitive to the possibility of failure , 2008 .

[35]  Petter Grytten Almklov,et al.  REDUCING THE GAP BETWEEN PROCEDURES AND PRACTICE - LESSONS FROM A SUCCESSFUL SAFETY INTERVENTION , 2008 .

[36]  Metin Celik,et al.  A Hybrid Decision-Making Approach to Measure Effectiveness of Safety Management System Implementations On-Board Ships , 2014 .

[37]  S. Antonsen,et al.  The relationship between regulation, safety management systems and safety culture in the maritime industry , 2013 .

[38]  Kristine Vedal Størkersen,et al.  One size fits all? Safety management regulation of ship accidents and personal injuries , 2017 .

[39]  Bjørn-Morten Batalden,et al.  Maritime safety and the ISM code: a study of investigated casualties and incidents , 2014 .

[40]  James S. Hodges,et al.  Six (Or So) Things You Can Do with a Bad Model , 1991, Oper. Res..

[41]  Gönenç Yücel,et al.  An Objective-Based Perspective on Assessment of Model-Supported Policy Processes , 2009, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[42]  Gesa Praetorius,et al.  Modelling Vessel Traffic Service to understand resilience in everyday operations , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[43]  William R. Shadish,et al.  Evaluation for the 21st century: A handbook. , 1997 .

[44]  Jens U. Schröder-Hinrichs,et al.  Human and organizational factors in the maritime world — Are we keeping up to speed? , 2010 .

[45]  Florence Yean Yng Ling,et al.  Developing a model to measure the effectiveness of safety management systems of construction sites , 2006 .

[46]  A. Rae,et al.  Open questions and closed minds : mapping the gaps and divisions in the safety body of knowledge , 2015 .

[47]  D. Mauriño Why SMS?: An Introduction and Overview of Safety Management Systems (SMS) , 2017 .

[48]  Ender Gerede,et al.  A Study of Challenges to the Success of the Safety Management System in Aircraft Maintenance Organizations in Turkey , 2015 .

[49]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  A STAMP-based approach for designing maritime safety management systems , 2018, Safety Science.

[50]  Muhittin Celik,et al.  Designing of integrated quality and safety management system (IQSMS) for shipping operations , 2009 .

[51]  Hubert J. Chen,et al.  Performance evaluation of airport safety management systems in Taiwan , 2015 .

[52]  A. Waring Safety management systems , 1995 .

[53]  Andrew Hale,et al.  MODELLING OF SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS , 1997 .

[54]  Matthew J. W. Thomas A systematic review of the effectiveness of safety management systems , 2012 .

[55]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  The design of VTS Finland Safety Intent Specification , 2017 .

[56]  Jean-Christophe Le Coze,et al.  The foundations of safety science , 2014 .

[57]  B Basso,et al.  Reviewing the safety management system by incident investigation and performance indicators , 2004 .

[58]  Ulla Tapaninen,et al.  Incident reporting in Finnish shipping companies , 2011 .

[59]  S. Dekker The bureaucratization of safety , 2014 .

[60]  Genserik Reniers,et al.  Engineering Risk Management , 2013 .

[61]  Teemu Reiman,et al.  Human and organizational biases affecting the management of safety , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..