How not to test for philosophical expertise
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] L. Petrinovich,et al. Influence of Wording and Framing Effects on Moral Intuitions , 1996 .
[2] Joachim Horvath,et al. How (not) to react to experimental philosophy , 2010 .
[3] Warren S. Quinn. Actions, intentions, and consequences: the doctrine of double effect. , 1989, Philosophy & public affairs.
[4] Timothy Williamson,et al. Philosophical 'Intuitions' and Scepticism about Judgement , 2005 .
[5] David Poeppel,et al. Towards a new functional anatomy of language , 2004, Cognition.
[6] Regina A. Rini. Analogies, Moral Intuitions, and the Expertise Defence , 2014 .
[7] Marcus Arvan. Bad News for Conservatives? Moral Judgments and the Dark Triad Personality Traits: A Correlational Study , 2011 .
[8] John Martin Fischer,et al. Ethics: Problems and Principles , 1992 .
[9] W. Sinnott-Armstrong,et al. The cognitive science of morality : intuition and diversity , 2008 .
[10] Adam Feltz,et al. The Actor–Observer Bias and Moral Intuitions: Adding Fuel to Sinnott-Armstrong’s Fire , 2008 .
[11] S. J. Harry J. Gensler. Ethics: A Contemporary Introduction , 1998 .
[12] Etienne P LeBel,et al. Fearing the Future of Empirical Psychology: Bem's (2011) Evidence of Psi as a Case Study of Deficiencies in Modal Research Practice , 2011, Review of General Psychology.
[13] E. Sosa. Experimental philosophy and philosophical intuition , 2007 .
[14] CM Bennett,et al. Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic Salmon: an argument for multiple comparisons correction , 2009, NeuroImage.
[15] J. Wright. On intuitional stability: The clear, the strong, and the paradigmatic , 2010, Cognition.
[16] Yasmina Okan,et al. Order effects in moral judgment , 2012 .
[17] S. Matthew Liao. The Loop Case and Kamm’s Doctrine of Triple Effect , 2008 .
[18] Timothy Williamson,et al. The Philosophy of Philosophy , 2022 .
[19] D. Bem. Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[20] H. Kornblith. The role of intuition in philosophical inquiry: An account with no unnatural ingredients. , 1998 .
[21] A. Kauppinen. THE RISE AND FALL OF EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY , 2007 .
[22] N. Shackel,et al. Methodological Issues in the Neuroscience of Moral Judgement , 2010, Mind & language.
[23] Joshua Alexander. Experimental Philosophy: An Introduction , 2012 .
[24] S. Liao,et al. Putting the trolley in order: Experimental philosophy and the loop case , 2012 .
[25] J. Thomson. Turning the Trolley , 2008 .
[26] John Bengson. Experimental Attacks on Intuitions and Answers , 2013 .
[27] J. Romanillos. Mortal questions , 2015 .
[28] Cameron Buckner,et al. Are philosophers expert intuiters? , 2010 .
[29] Shaun Nichols,et al. VARIATIONS IN ETHICAL INTUITIONS , 2009 .
[30] Peter Unger,et al. Living high and letting die: Our illusion of innocence , 1998 .
[31] A Theory of the A Priori , 2000 .
[32] T. Grundmann. Some hope for intuitions: A reply to Weinberg , 2010 .
[33] R. ShafEr-Landau. The Fundamentals of Ethics , 2009 .
[34] Peter Miller. Who are the Moral Experts , 1975 .
[35] Stephen Stich,et al. Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions , 2001 .
[36] Tania Lombrozo,et al. The Role of Moral Commitments in Moral Judgment , 2009, Cogn. Sci..
[37] J. Thomson. Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. , 1976, The Monist.
[38] P. Foot. The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect , 2020, The Doctrine of Double Effect.
[39] K. Ludwig. The Epistemology of Thought Experiments: First Person versus Third Person Approaches , 2007 .
[40] J. J. C. Smart,et al. Utilitarianism: For and Against , 1975 .
[41] Walter Sinnott-Armstrong,et al. Framing moral intuitions. , 2008 .
[42] E. E. Jones. Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior , 1987 .
[43] T. Williamson. PHILOSOPHICAL EXPERTISE AND THE BURDEN OF PROOF , 2011 .
[44] J. Ryberg. Moral intuitions and the expertise defence , 2013 .
[45] S. Stich,et al. Semantics, cross-cultural style , 2004, Cognition.
[46] E. E. Jones,et al. The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .
[47] John D. Rawls,et al. Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics , 1951 .
[48] F. Cushman,et al. Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on Moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Non-Philosophers , 2012 .
[49] Joshua Alexander,et al. The instability of philosophical intuitions: Running hot and cold on truetemp , 2008 .
[50] Simon Cullen. Survey-Driven Romanticism , 2010 .
[51] Joshua Alexander,et al. The Challenge of Sticking with Intuitions through Thick and Thin , 2014 .
[52] Eric Schwitzgebel. Please Scroll down for Article Philosophical Psychology Do Ethicists Steal More Books? , 2022 .
[53] R. Audi. Intuition, Inference, and Rational Disagreement in Ethics , 2008 .
[54] S. Stich,et al. Moral intuitions: Are philosophers experts? , 2013 .
[55] Michael B. Miller,et al. of Serendipitous and Unexpected Results Neural Correlates of Interspecies Perspective Taking in the Post-Mortem Atlantic Salmon : An Argument For Proper Multiple Comparisons Correction , 2010 .
[56] Julia Driver,et al. Ethics: The Fundamentals , 2006 .
[57] Edward T. Cokely,et al. Persistent bias in expert judgments about free will and moral responsibility: A test of the expertise defense , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.
[58] H. Cappelen. Philosophy Without Intuitions , 2012 .
[59] Eric Schwitzgebel,et al. Ethicists’ courtesy at philosophy conferences , 2012 .
[60] E. Sosa. Intuitions and meaning divergence , 2010 .
[61] A. Lanteri,et al. An Experimental Investigation of Emotions and Reasoning in the Trolley Problem , 2008 .
[62] Frances Kamm. I–Frances M. Kamm , 2000 .
[63] D. Chalmers,et al. What do philosophers believe? , 2014 .