Enhancing Group Decision Making: An Exercise to Reduce Shared Information Bias

Research on shared information bias has shown that group members involved in a decision-making task tend to undervalue information that a single member shares with the group, especially when that information conflicts with their prior conclusions. The group activity in this article is intended to heighten awareness of this shared information bias on group decision making. Students must choose among three candidates in a hiring simulation that uses a hidden profile methodology. In a sample of 20 student groups, only 4 groups chose the candidate with the most positive qualities, indicating most did not uncover the hidden profile. The exercise concludes with a discussion about the individual and group-level biases that affect group decision making and methods to enhance impartial deliberation of information.

[1]  Leslie J. Briggs,et al.  Principles of Instructional Design , 1974 .

[2]  Norman R. F. Maier,et al.  The Role-Play Technique: A Handbook for Management and Leadership Practice , 1975 .

[3]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[4]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .

[5]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups , 1994 .

[6]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Diagnosing groups: charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  A. Hollingshead The Rank-Order Effect in Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[8]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Leadership Style and the Discussion of Shared and Unshared Information in Decision-Making Groups , 1998 .

[9]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Diagnosing groups: the pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Information Sampling in Decision-Making Groups , 1998 .

[11]  S. Karau,et al.  Group Decision Making: The Effects of Initial Preferences and Time Pressure , 1999 .

[12]  J. Hunton Mitigating the Common Information Sampling Bias Inherent in Small‐Group Discussion (Retracted) , 2001 .

[13]  Mitigating the Common Information Sampling Bias Inherent in Small-Group Discussion , 2016 .

[14]  T. Postmes,et al.  Quality of decision making and group norms. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  G. Stasser,et al.  Hidden Profiles: A Brief History , 2003 .

[16]  Janet A. Lenaghan,et al.  The Interiors Plant Shutdown: Using Dialectic Inquiry in a Complex Ethical Decision , 2004 .

[17]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm , 2004 .

[18]  John M. Keller,et al.  Principles of instructional design, 5th edition , 2005 .

[19]  S. Schulz-Hardt,et al.  Group decision making in hidden profile situations: dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Ulrich Klocke How to Improve Decision Making in Small Groups , 2007 .

[21]  Philip J. Trocchia,et al.  Digging Deeper: the Laddering Interview, a Tool for Surfacing Values , 2007 .

[22]  Do Teams Who Agree to Disagree Make Better Decisions , 2007 .

[23]  Felix C. Brodbeck,et al.  Group Decision Making Under Conditions of Distributed Knowledge: The Information Asymmetries Model. , 2007 .

[24]  George Williams in Thailand: an Ethical Decision-Making Exercise , 2007 .