Automation of motor dexterity assessment

Motor dexterity assessment is regularly performed in rehabilitation wards to establish patient status and automatization for such routinary task is sought. A system for automatizing the assessment of motor dexterity based on the Fugl-Meyer scale and with loose restrictions on sensing technologies is presented. The system consists of two main elements: 1) A data representation that abstracts the low level information obtained from a variety of sensors, into a highly separable low dimensionality encoding employing t-distributed Stochastic Neighbourhood Embedding, and, 2) central to this communication, a multi-label classifier that boosts classification rates by exploiting the fact that the classes corresponding to the individual exercises are naturally organized as a network. Depending on the targeted therapeutic movement class labels i.e. exercises scores, are highly correlated-patients who perform well in one, tends to perform well in related exercises-; and critically no node can be used as proxy of others — an exercise does not encode the information of other exercises. Over data from a cohort of 20 patients, the novel classifier outperforms classical Naive Bayes, random forest and variants of support vector machines (ANOVA: p < 0.001). The novel multi-label classification strategy fulfills an automatic system for motor dexterity assessment, with implications for lessening therapist's workloads, reducing healthcare costs and providing support for home-based virtual rehabilitation and telerehabilitation alternatives.

[1]  Deva Ramanan,et al.  Assessment of Post-Stroke Functioning Using Machine Vision , 2007, MVA.

[2]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Gesture Therapy: An Upper Limb Virtual Reality-Based Motor Rehabilitation Platform , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  P. Heyer Automatic assessment of motor dexterity for rehabilitation with a representation nonspecific on sensor , 2016 .

[4]  Juho Rousu,et al.  Kernel-Based Learning of Hierarchical Multilabel Classification Models , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[5]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  The Isomap Algorithm and Topological Stability , 2002, Science.

[6]  Hugo Jair Escalante,et al.  Particle Swarm Model Selection , 2009, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[7]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[8]  João P. S. Cunha,et al.  Towards a movement quantification system capable of automatic evaluation of upper limb motor function after neurological injury , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  B Bonnechère,et al.  Can serious games be incorporated with conventional treatment of children with cerebral palsy? A review. , 2014, Research in developmental disabilities.

[10]  Luis Enrique Sucar,et al.  Sensor Abstracted Extremity Representation for Automatic Fugl-Meyer Assessment , 2017 .

[11]  N. Paik,et al.  Upper Extremity Functional Evaluation by Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scoring Using Depth-Sensing Camera in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients , 2016, PloS one.

[12]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[13]  Luis Enrique Sucar,et al.  Sensor adequacy and arm movement encoding for automatic assessment of motor dexterity for virtual rehabilitation , 2016 .

[14]  H. Hotelling Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. , 1933 .

[15]  Concha Bielza,et al.  Multi-label classification with Bayesian network-based chain classifiers , 2014, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[16]  S. G. Nelson,et al.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[17]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Java Therapy : Web-Based Robotic Rehabilit ation , 2001 .

[18]  Pascal Vincent,et al.  Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[19]  Luis Enrique Sucar,et al.  Multi-label Classification for Tree and Directed Acyclic Graphs Hierarchies , 2014, Probabilistic Graphical Models.

[20]  Andreas Christmann,et al.  Support vector machines , 2008, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook.

[21]  Ron S. Leder,et al.  Qualification of arm gestures using hidden Markov models , 2008, 2008 8th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition.

[22]  Saso Dzeroski,et al.  Decision Trees for Hierarchical Multilabel Classification: A Case Study in Functional Genomics , 2006, PKDD.

[23]  Saso Dzeroski,et al.  Decision trees for hierarchical multi-label classification , 2008, Machine Learning.

[24]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .

[25]  P. Duncan,et al.  Measurement of Motor Recovery After Stroke: Outcome Assessment and Sample Size Requirements , 1992, Stroke.

[26]  Geoff Holmes,et al.  Classifier chains for multi-label classification , 2009, Machine Learning.

[27]  Kun Zhang,et al.  Multi-label learning by exploiting label dependency , 2010, KDD.

[28]  Grigorios Tsoumakas,et al.  Multi-Label Classification: An Overview , 2007, Int. J. Data Warehous. Min..