Effects of Cornerstone Design Experience on Innovative Behavior and Perceptions in engineering for First-Year Engineering Students

This Work-In-Progress paper on innovative practices evaluated the effects of a blended cornerstone design course which was offered to first-year engineering students. In particular the changes of students’ individual innovative behavior and their various perceptions in engineering are studied and discussed. Recent studies indicated that cornerstone design courses have the potentials to develop innovative minds’ of students, integrating their engineering knowledge to solve real-world, interdisciplinary problems. A first year engineering course, First Year Cornerstone Engineering Design Project Course (ENGG1100), was designed based on a collaborative problem-based learning environment which supports students to explore different disciplines of engineering, apply new concepts acquired through online modules, design engineering artifacts, in this case an ‘airship’, and test and modify their artifact in an iterative design process cycle. Pre- and post- self-reported surveys were administered to measure the effects of this course. Results were analyzed and discussed. Our analysis shows that the students’ innovative behavior and their engineering design self-efficacy changed positively after students went through the cornerstone design experience. The results from this trial have led to inspiring insights in future studies on approaches to fostering innovation mindsets.

[1]  Brett D. Jones,et al.  An Analysis of Motivation Constructs with First‐Year Engineering Students: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans , 2010 .

[2]  Eric M. Anderman,et al.  International Guide to Student Achievement , 2013 .

[3]  Renée Mauborgne,et al.  Blue ocean strategy. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[4]  B.H. Hamlin,et al.  Cornerstone design - integrated mathematical model analysis for first semester design experiences , 2007, 2007 37th Annual Frontiers In Education Conference - Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports.

[5]  Natasa Grgurina.  INFORMATICS EDUCATION - SUPPORTING COMPUTATIONAL THINKING , 2008 .

[6]  Hee-Sun Lee,et al.  Measuring Engineering Design Self‐Efficacy , 2010 .

[7]  J. Eccles,et al.  Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[8]  Chris T. Street,et al.  Toward a multi‐dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior , 2001 .

[9]  J. Duderstadt.  Engineering for a Changing World , 2010 .

[10]  S. W. Gyeszly,et al.  Protocol analysis of the engineering systems design process , 1991 .

[11]  Secondary Education. Office for Career.  Massachusetts science and technology/engineering curriculum framework , 2006 .

[12]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1995 .

[13]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Structured and opportunistic processing in design: a critical discussion , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[14]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[15]  Mary Kathryn Thompson.  Fostering Innovation in Cornerstone Design Courses , 2012 .

[16]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.