Vulnerability analysis of cascading dynamics in smart grids under load redistribution attacks

Abstract Smart grids integrate power system engineering with information and communication technology to form a complex system. In this study, a framework is proposed to model the smart grid as interdependent complex networks and investigate the topology vulnerabilities subject to targeted attacks. As a serious targeted cyber-physical threat, the load redistribution attack is a type of false data injection attack. Adversaries can intentionally intercept communication traffic flows or cooperatively manipulate data transmitted over the communication network to mislead the control centre to perform incorrect actions, thereby tripping off lines or breakers, and even triggering cascading failures. Based on the intelligent attack mechanism, a new approach is introduced to identify sequential attack targets according to the node importance, which can in turn collapse the entire power system. Based on the particular characteristics of power systems, the components require achieving a power balance through the redistribution or shedding of loads in each attack. Compared to random removal and block removal, the effectiveness of the proposed strategy was validated on the IEEE 39-bus and the actual provincial backbone network. From the analysis of the experimental results, we find that the topology vulnerability is closely related to the critical node types and locations.

[1]  Kit Po Wong,et al.  Influence of enhanced interconnecting links on cascading failures in smart grid , 2015, 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[2]  L. Tian,et al.  Percolation of partially interdependent networks under targeted attack. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Zuyi Li,et al.  Modeling Load Redistribution Attacks in Power Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[4]  Zuyi Li,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Load Redistribution Attacks in Power Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[5]  Adilson E Motter,et al.  Cascade-based attacks on complex networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Michael Chertkov,et al.  Predicting Failures in Power Grids: The Case of Static Overloads , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[7]  Oliver Kosut,et al.  Vulnerability Analysis and Consequences of False Data Injection Attack on Power System State Estimation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  Haibo He,et al.  Supplementary File : Revealing Cascading Failure Vulnerability in Power Grids using Risk-Graph , 2013 .

[9]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks , 2009, Nature.

[10]  K. Goh,et al.  Universal behavior of load distribution in scale-free networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[11]  Evangelos Pournaras,et al.  Self-Repairable Smart Grids Via Online Coordination of Smart Transformers , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[12]  Evangelos Pournaras,et al.  Measuring network reliability and repairability against cascading failures , 2019, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[13]  Jianwei Wang,et al.  Mitigation of cascading failures on complex networks , 2012, Nonlinear Dynamics.

[14]  Marco Aiello,et al.  The Power Grid as a Complex Network: a Survey , 2011, ArXiv.

[15]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Cascade of failures in coupled network systems with multiple support-dependent relations , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Rong Yang,et al.  Cascade failure analysis of power grid using new load distribution law and node removal rule , 2016 .

[17]  Vittorio Rosato,et al.  Modelling interdependent infrastructures using interacting dynamical models , 2008, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructures.

[18]  Zhao Yang Dong,et al.  Complex network theory based power grid vulnerability assessment from past to future , 2012 .

[19]  Shuliang Wang,et al.  Vulnerability analysis and critical areas identification of the power systems under terrorist attacks , 2017 .

[20]  Haibo He,et al.  Resilience Analysis of Power Grids Under the Sequential Attack , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[21]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .

[22]  Peng Ning,et al.  False data injection attacks against state estimation in electric power grids , 2009, CCS.

[23]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[24]  Hamid Sharif,et al.  A Survey on Smart Grid Communication Infrastructures: Motivations, Requirements and Challenges , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[25]  Yong Li,et al.  Modeling and impact analysis of interdependent characteristics on cascading failures in smart grids , 2017 .

[26]  Yongxiang Xia,et al.  Effect of network size on robustness of interconnected networks under targeted attack , 2015 .

[27]  Sushmita Ruj,et al.  Analyzing Cascading Failures in Smart Grids under Random and Targeted Attacks , 2014, 2014 IEEE 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications.

[28]  Hamed Mohsenian Rad,et al.  False data injection attacks with incomplete information against smart power grids , 2012, 2012 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[29]  Zhao Yang Dong,et al.  The 2015 Ukraine Blackout: Implications for False Data Injection Attacks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[30]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[31]  Zuyi Li,et al.  Modeling of Local False Data Injection Attacks With Reduced Network Information , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[32]  My T. Thai,et al.  Detecting Critical Nodes in Interdependent Power Networks for Vulnerability Assessment , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.