Performance Enhancement of a Partially Shaded Photovoltaic Array by Optimal Reconfiguration and Current Injection Schemes

The output of a photovoltaic array is reduced considerably when PV panels are shaded even partially. The impact of shading causes an appreciable loss in power delivery, since the PV panels are connected in series and parallel to contribute to the required voltage and power for the load. The prevailing research on mitigating the shading impact is mostly based on complex reconfiguration strategies where the PV panels are subjected to complex rewiring schemes. On the other hand, to disperse the shading many studies in the literature defend the physical rearrangement of the panels. The available intensive reconfiguration schemes, such as the series parallel (SP), bridge link (BL), honeycomb (HC), and total cross tied (TCT) schemes, try only to mitigate the shading impact and there is no scope for compensation; as a result, a loss of output power is inevitable. In the proposed research work, both the mitigation of and the compensation for the losses incurred due to shading are studied. In this work, an optimal reconfiguration scheme is adopted to reduce the shading impact and a power electronic circuit with a battery source is designed to compensate for the shading losses in all aspects. In the optimal reconfiguration scheme, a bifurcation strategy is adopted in each column and the electrical connections of the PV panels are interchanged such that the shading impact is dispersed. The power electronic circuit consists of a half-bridge buck converter with a battery source that injects the current required by a shaded column. This setup compensates for the shaded PV array’s power and improves the efficiency of the total system. The proposed scheme was implemented in a 3200 W system and subjected to various shading patterns, including single panel shading, corner shading, long and wide shading, and random shading. The proposed scheme was simulated in the MATLAB Simulink environment and compared with static 4 × 4 PV array configurations, including the series parallel (SP), bridge link (BL), honeycomb (HC), and total cross tied (TCT) configurations. The comparative performance was assessed in terms of mismatch power loss, fill factor, and efficiency. The proposed system is suitable for all shading patterns and was proved to be very efficient even in the worst shading, where 1353 W was saved.

[1]  Zheng Jian,et al.  An improved MPPT control strategy based on incremental conductance method , 2020, Soft Comput..

[2]  Xinghuo Yu,et al.  An Overall Distribution Particle Swarm Optimization MPPT Algorithm for Photovoltaic System Under Partial Shading , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[3]  Performance investigation of hybrid and conventional PV array configurations for grid-connected/standalone PV systems , 2020, CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems.

[4]  Pankaj Kumar,et al.  Performance Analysis of Different PV Topologies with MPPT , 2017 .

[5]  Seppo Valkealahti,et al.  Effect of Photovoltaic Generator Components on the Number of MPPs Under Partial Shading Conditions , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[6]  Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban,et al.  Investigation of MPPT Techniques Under Uniform and Non-Uniform Solar Irradiation Condition–A Retrospection , 2020, IEEE Access.

[7]  H. N. Suresh,et al.  Performance enhancement of Hybrid interconnected Solar Photovoltaic array using shade dispersion Magic Square Puzzle Pattern technique under partial shading conditions , 2019 .

[8]  Yi-Hwa Liu,et al.  A Fast and Efficient Maximum Power Tracking Combining Simplified State Estimation With Adaptive Perturb and Observe , 2020, IEEE Access.

[9]  Md. Shahidul Islam,et al.  PSO and ANN Based Hybrid MPPT Algorithm for Photovoltaic Array under Partial Shading Condition , 2020 .

[10]  Tukaram Moger,et al.  Improved SuDoKu reconfiguration technique for total-cross-tied PV array to enhance maximum power under partial shading conditions , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[11]  Karima Benatchba,et al.  A new MPPT controller based on the Ant colony optimization algorithm for Photovoltaic systems under partial shading conditions , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[12]  R. Arulmurugan Optimization of Perturb and Observe Based Fuzzy Logic MPPT Controller for Independent PV Solar System , 2020, WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS.

[13]  Matti Lehtonen,et al.  Proposed ANFIS Based Approach for Fault Tracking, Detection, Clearing and Rearrangement for Photovoltaic System , 2021, Sensors.

[14]  S. Sreejith,et al.  Factors influencing the efficiency of photovoltaic system , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[15]  S. Mekhilef,et al.  Improved Differential Evolution-Based MPPT Algorithm Using SEPIC for PV Systems Under Partial Shading Conditions and Load Variation , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[16]  Kai Ni,et al.  A Novel PV Array Reconfiguration Algorithm Approach to Optimising Power Generation across Non-Uniformly Aged PV Arrays by Merely Repositioning , 2020, J — Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal.

[17]  Okan Bingöl,et al.  Analysis and comparison of different PV array configurations under partial shading conditions , 2018 .

[18]  S. Andrew Gadsden,et al.  Parameter estimation of PV solar cells and modules using Whippy Harris Hawks Optimization Algorithm , 2021 .

[19]  Chakkarapani Manickam,et al.  A Hybrid Algorithm for Tracking of GMPP Based on P&O and PSO With Reduced Power Oscillation in String Inverters , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[20]  Matti Lehtonen,et al.  Estimating Parameters of Photovoltaic Models Using Accurate Turbulent Flow of Water Optimizer , 2021 .

[21]  S. Jeevananthan,et al.  A new maximum power tracking in PV system during partially shaded conditions based on shuffled frog leap algorithm , 2017, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[22]  Deng Shifeng,et al.  Research on hot spot risk for high-efficiency solar module , 2017 .

[23]  A. Mishra,et al.  Analysis and Modeling of Photo-Voltaic (PV) Cell Power Generation System using Simulink , 2018 .

[24]  D. Devaraj,et al.  A novel MPPT controller using Neural Network and Gain-Scheduled PI for Solar PV system under rapidly varying environmental condition , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[25]  Rodrigo Correa,et al.  Mismatched Series–Parallel Photovoltaic Generator Modeling: An Implicit Current–Voltage Approach , 2019, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[26]  Sridhar Ramasamy,et al.  An Intelligent Differential Evolution based Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) Technique for Partially Shaded Photo Voltaic (PV) Array , 2014 .

[27]  B. K. Karmakar,et al.  A Current Supported PV Array Reconfiguration Technique to Mitigate Partial Shading , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[28]  S. Kumaravel,et al.  Performance improvement of solar PV array topologies during various partial shading conditions , 2020 .

[29]  Nilam Rajendra Deshmukh Comparision of Perturb and Observer and Incremental Conductance MPPT Based Solar Tracking System. , 2015 .