Attitude strength and resistance processes.

This study examined whether multiple indicators of attitude strength form general dimensions that foster differential pathways to resistance. Ego involvement, certainty, personal importance, knowledge, and extremity were assessed. Resistance processes and outcomes were measured in a selective judgment paradigm. Intentions to act on attitudes and information-seeking proclivities were also assessed. Factor analysis of the strength measures revealed 2 factors. Both fostered intentions to act but were associated with differential resistance processes and outcomes. Heightened levels of the factor representing Commitment to one's position were associated with increased selective elaboration, selective judgment, and attitude polarization. Embeddedness, the linkage of the attitude to one's self-concept, value system, and knowledge structure, was associated with decreased selective elaboration and increased information seeking and selective memory.

[1]  James Jaccard,et al.  Attitudes and behavior: An information integration perspective , 1985 .

[2]  A. Tesser.  Self-Generated Attitude Change , 1978 .

[3]  Wendy Wood,et al.  Access to Attitude-Relevant Information in Memory as a Determinant of Attitude-Behavior Consistency , 1986 .

[4]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Structural consistency and attitude strength. , 1995 .

[5]  A. Miller,et al.  The attitude polarization phenomenon : role of response measure, attitude extremity, and behavioral consequences of reported attitude change , 1993 .

[6]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship☆ , 1978 .

[7]  J. Pligt,et al.  Attitude extremity, consensus and diagnosticity , 1983 .

[8]  T. Ewing,et al.  A Study of Certain Factors Involved in Changes of Opinion , 1942 .

[9]  M. Zanna,et al.  On the predictive validity of attitudes: The roles of direct experience and confidence1 , 1978 .

[10]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs? , 1993 .

[11]  R. Fazio,et al.  Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association , 1982 .

[12]  J. Krosnick.  Attitude importance and attitude change , 1988 .

[13]  Eugene Borgida,et al.  Personal involvement and the robustness of perceptual salience effects. , 1983 .

[14]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[15]  B. J. Fine.  Conclusion-drawing, communicator credibility, and anxiety as factors in opinion change. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[16]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[17]  Muzafer Sherif,et al.  Attitude and Attitude Change , 1966 .

[18]  D. Raden,et al.  Strength-related attitude dimensions , 1985 .

[19]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  Communicator Attributes and Persuasion , 1988, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[20]  J. Maloney,et al.  Attitude research plays for high stakes , 1979 .

[21]  Christopher Leone,et al.  Cognitive schemas and thought as determinants of attitude change , 1977 .

[22]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Affective-cognitive consistency and the effect of salient behavioral information on the self-perception of attitudes. , 1981 .

[23]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Toward a process model of the attitude-behavior relation: Accessing one's attitude upon mere observation of the attitude object. , 1983 .

[24]  K. Jöreskog.  A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1969 .

[25]  J. N. Bassili,et al.  Response-time measurement in survey research: A method for CATI and a new look at nonattitudes. , 1991 .

[26]  W F Velicer,et al.  An Evaluation of the Effects of Variable Sampling On Component, Image, and Factor Analysis. , 1987, Multivariate behavioral research.

[27]  C. Kiesler.  The psychology of commitment : experiments linking behavior to belief , 1971 .

[28]  C. Osgood,et al.  The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. , 1955, Psychological review.

[29]  P. Tannenbaum,et al.  Theories of cognitive consistency: a sourcebook. , 1968 .

[30]  S. Yantis,et al.  Amount of information about the attitude object and attitude-behavior consistency. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Affective-cognitive consistency and thought-induced attitude polarization. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Biased Processing as a Function of Attitude Accessibility: Making Objective Judgments Subjectively , 1989 .

[33]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Attitude strength, attitude structure, and resistance to change , 1995 .

[34]  W. Wood.  Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. , 1982 .

[35]  J. Sample,et al.  Attitude and Prediction of Behavior , 1973 .

[36]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Origins of attitude importance: self-interest, social identification, and value relevance. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social cognition, 2nd ed. , 1991 .

[38]  J. Krosnick.  Americans' Perceptions of Presidential Candidates: A Test of the Projection Hypothesis , 1990 .

[39]  R. Fazio,et al.  Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: an investigation of the 1984 presidential election. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudes and Attitude Change , 1993 .

[41]  G. Clore,et al.  Interpersonal attraction: the role of agreement and topic interest. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  S. Presser,et al.  Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context , 1996 .

[43]  C. Sherif,et al.  Personal involvement, social judgment, and action. , 1973 .

[44]  Wendy Wood,et al.  Access to attitude-relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion: The role of message attributes , 1985 .

[45]  K. Petersen,et al.  Centrality, Extremity, Intensity Neglected Variables in Research on Attitude-Behavior Consistency , 1975 .

[46]  R. Norman,et al.  Affective-cognitive consistency, attitudes, conformity, and behavior. , 1975 .

[47]  Lawrence J. Marks,et al.  The Use of Product Sampling and Advertising: Effects of Sequence of Exposure and Degree of Advertising Claim Exaggeration on Consumers’ Belief Strength, Belief Confidence, and Attitudes , 1988 .

[48]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .