What kind of science can information science be?

During the 20th century there was a strong desire to develop an information science from librarianship, bibliography, and documentation and in 1968 the American Documentation Institute changed its name to the American Society for Information Science. By the beginning of the 21st century, however, departments of (library and) information science had turned instead towards the social sciences. These programs address a variety of important topics, but they have been less successful in providing a coherent explanation of the nature and scope of the field. Progress can be made towards a coherent, unified view of the roles of archives, libraries, museums, online information services, and related organizations if they are treated as information-providing services. However, such an approach seems significantly incomplete on ordinary understandings of the providing of information. Instead of asking what information science is or what we might wish it to become, we ask instead what kind of field it can be given our assumptions about it. We approach the question by examining some keywords: science, information, knowledge, and interdisciplinary. We conclude that if information science is concerned with what people know, then it is a form of cultural engagement, and at most, a science of the artificial.

[1]  Antoine Arnauld,et al.  Logic, or the Art of Thinking: Being the Port-Royal Logic , 2012 .

[2]  Michael K. Buckland Obsolescence in subject description , 2012, J. Documentation.

[3]  Michael K. Buckland Naming in the Library: Marks, Meaning, and Machines , 2012 .

[4]  Jeannine Mjoseth Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) , 2010 .

[5]  Sren Brier,et al.  Cybersemiotics: Why Information Is Not Enough (Toronto Studies in Semiotics and Communication) , 2008 .

[6]  S. Brier Cybersemiotics: Why Information Is Not Enough , 2008 .

[7]  H. R. Ekbia,et al.  Artificial Dreams: Subject Index , 2008 .

[8]  H. Ekbia Artificial Dreams: The Quest for Non-Biological Intelligence , 2008 .

[9]  Y. L. Coadic What Is Documentation , 2007 .

[10]  Garrett Fitzgerald The devil’s doctor: Paracelsus and the world of Renaissance magic and science , 2007 .

[11]  Allan Mark Konrad,et al.  On Inquiry: Human Concept Formation and Construction of Meaning through Library and Information Science Intermediation , 2007 .

[12]  Bernd Frohmann The Role of Facts in Paul Otlet's Modernist Project of Documentation , 2007 .

[13]  Daniel Tranel,et al.  Knowing “What” and Knowing “When” , 2006, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[14]  P. Kleingeld,et al.  The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2013 .

[15]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context , 2005, The Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval.

[16]  Jonathan Furner,et al.  Information Studies Without Information , 2004, Libr. Trends.

[17]  Joseph S. Renzulli,et al.  The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented: Recent Studies and a Look at the Future of Research in Our Field , 2003 .

[18]  Ronald E. Day,et al.  The Modern Invention of Information: Discourse, History, and Power , 2001 .

[19]  Matthias Steup,et al.  The Analysis of Knowledge , 2001 .

[20]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  Information science: What is it? , 1968 .

[21]  Michael K. Buckland The Landscape of Information Science: The American Society for Information Science at 62 , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[22]  Christian John Plaunt A functional model of information retrieval systems , 1998 .

[23]  Michael K. Buckland,et al.  What Is a "Document"? , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[24]  J. Olaisen,et al.  Information science : from the development of the discipline to social interaction , 1996 .

[25]  Christian Plaunt,et al.  On the Construction of Selection Systems. , 1994 .

[26]  Ben-Ami Lipetz,et al.  Dilemmas in the study of information: Exploring the boundaries of information science , 1993 .

[27]  Patrick Wilson,et al.  Dilemmas in the Study of Information: Exploring the Boundaries of Information Science , 1992 .

[28]  Michael K. Buckland,et al.  Information as thing , 1991, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[29]  Michael K. Buckland,et al.  Information and information systems , 1991 .

[30]  K. Lehrer Theory Of Knowledge , 1990 .

[31]  Igor Aleksander,et al.  The Study of Information: Interdisciplinary Messages , 1986, J. Inf. Technol..

[32]  N. Roberts,et al.  Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority: P. Wilson. London: Greenwood Press, 1983. 210 pp. ISBN 0 313 23763 8. £28.95. , 1985 .

[33]  F. Machlup,et al.  The Study of Information: Interdisciplinary Messages , 1984 .

[34]  Michael K. Buckland Relatedness, relevance and responsiveness in retrieval systems , 1983, Inf. Process. Manag..

[35]  R. Merton,et al.  Genesis and development of a scientific fact , 1979 .

[36]  P. Wilson Two kinds of power : an essay on bibliographical control , 1978 .

[37]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[38]  Donald M. Borchert Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 1967 .

[39]  G. Ryle I.—Knowing How and Knowing that: The Presidential Address , 1946 .

[40]  Myron Louis Gochnauer,et al.  The Analysis of Knowledge , 1941, Nature.

[41]  J. Yolton A Theory of Knowledge , 1924, Nature.

[42]  Primitive Culture , 1871, Nature.