Associative learning of plant odorants activating the same or different receptor neurones in the moth Heliothis virescens

SUMMARY The importance of olfactory learning in host plant selection is well demonstrated in insects, including the heliothine moths. In the present study olfactory conditioning of the proboscis extension response was performed to determine the moths' ability to learn and discriminate three plant odorants:β -ocimene and β-myrcene (activating the same receptor neurone type), and racemic linalool (activating two different types). The conditioned stimulus (CS) was an air puff with each odorant blown into a constant air stream and over the antennae, and the unconditioned stimulus (US) was sucrose solution applied first to the antennal taste sensilla, then to the proboscis. Conditioning with increasing odorant concentrations induced increased learning performance. The concentration threshold for learning was 100 times lower for racemic linalool than for the two other odorants, a fact that can be correlated with a higher sensitivity of the moths' antennae to racemic linalool as shown in electroantennogram recordings. After correcting for the different odour sensitivities, the moths' ability to discriminate the odorants was studied. Differential conditioning experiments were carried out, in which moths had to distinguish between a rewarded (CS+) odorant and an explicitly unrewarded odorant (CS-), choosing odour concentrations giving the same learning rate in previous experiments. The best discrimination was found with β-myrcene as the rewarded odorant and racemic linalool as the unrewarded. The opposite combination gave lower discrimination, indicating a higher salience for β-myrcene than for racemic linalool. The moths could also discriminate betweenβ -ocimene and β-myrcene, which was surprising, since they activate the same receptor neurone type. No difference in salience was found between these two odorants.

[1]  H. Mustaparta Encoding of plant odour information in insects: peripheral and central mechanisms , 2002 .

[2]  A. Borg-Karlson,et al.  (–)-Germacrene D receptor neurones in three species of heliothine moths: structure-activity relationships , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[3]  J. Hildebrand,et al.  Learning modulates the ensemble representations for odors in primary olfactory networks. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  B. Hansson,et al.  Sex or Food? Appetetive Learning of Sex Odors in a Male Moth , 1999, Naturwissenschaften.

[5]  K. Daly,et al.  Olfactory-based discrimination learning in the moth, Manduca sexta. , 2001, Journal of insect physiology.

[6]  K. Daly,et al.  Associative olfactory learning in the moth Manduca sexta. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  F. Marion-Poll,et al.  Discrimination of oilseed rape volatiles by the honeybee: combined chemical and biological approaches , 1997 .

[8]  R. Menzel,et al.  Learning and memory in honeybees: from behavior to neural substrates. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  M. Bitterman,et al.  Classical conditioning of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera). , 1983, Journal of comparative psychology.

[10]  J. Mauelshagen,et al.  Neural correlates of olfactory learning paradigms in an identified neuron in the honeybee brain. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  R. Menzel,et al.  Effects of two bitter substances on olfactory conditioning in the moth Heliothis virescens , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[12]  M. Hammer An identified neuron mediates the unconditioned stimulus in associative olfactory learning in honeybees , 1993, Nature.

[13]  R. Menzel Searching for the memory trace in a mini-brain, the honeybee. , 2001, Learning & memory.

[14]  C Giovanni Galizia,et al.  Digital atlases of the antennal lobe in two species of tobacco budworm moths, the oriental Helicoverpa assulta (male) and the American Heliothis virescens (male and female) , 2002, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  Myron P. Zalucki,et al.  Learning, odour preference and flower foraging in moths , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  A. Borg-Karlson,et al.  The plant sesquiterpene germacrene D specifically activates a major type of antennal receptor neuron of the tobacco budworm moth Heliothis virescens. , 2000, Chemical senses.

[17]  B. Hansson,et al.  Appetitive Learning of Odours With Different Behavioural Meaning in Moths , 1999, Physiology & Behavior.

[18]  F. Marion-Poll,et al.  Discrimination of oilseed rape volatiles by honey bee: Novel combined gas chromatographic-electrophysiological behavioral assay , 1994, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[19]  B. Hansson,et al.  Olfactory discrimination conditioning in the moth Spodoptera littoralis , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[20]  R. Menzel Memory dynamics in the honeybee , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[21]  R. Menzel,et al.  Visualizing mushroom body response to a conditioned odor in honeybees , 2001, Naturwissenschaften.

[22]  Ronald L. Davis,et al.  Altered Representation of the Spatial Code for Odors after Olfactory Classical Conditioning Memory Trace Formation by Synaptic Recruitment , 2004, Neuron.

[23]  A. Borg-Karlson,et al.  Selective receptor neurone responses to E-β-ocimene, β-myrcene, E,E-α-farnesene and homo-farnesene in the moth Heliothis virescens, identified by gas chromatography linked to electrophysiology , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[24]  A. Borg-Karlson,et al.  Receptor neurones in three heliothine moths responding to floral nd inducible plant volatiles , 2003, CHEMOECOLOGY.

[25]  S. West,et al.  Learning in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): a new look at the behaviour and control of a polyphagous pest , 1999 .

[26]  B. Smith,et al.  Olfactory conditioning in the honey bee, Apis mellifera: Effects of odor intensity , 1997, Physiology & Behavior.

[27]  Anderson,et al.  Behavioural analysis of olfactory conditioning in the moth spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: noctuidae) , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[28]  B. Smith,et al.  Different thresholds for detection and discrimination of odors in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). , 2004, Chemical senses.

[29]  Daniel R. Papaj,et al.  ECOLOGICAL AND EVOLUTIONARY ASPECTS OF LEARNING IN PHYTOPHAGOUS INSECTS , 1989 .

[30]  M. Zalucki,et al.  Learning in host selection in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  R. D. Jong,et al.  A learning‐related variation in electroantennogram responses of a parasitic wasp , 1990 .

[32]  R. D. Jong,et al.  Electroantennogram responses related to olfactory conditioning in the honey bee (Apis mellifera ligustica) , 1991 .

[33]  S. West,et al.  Learning in the nectar foraging behaviour of Helicoverpa armigera , 1998 .

[34]  M. Renou,et al.  Asymmetrical generalisation between pheromonal and floral odours in appetitive olfactory conditioning of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[35]  C. Galizia,et al.  Representation of primary plant odorants in the antennal lobe of the moth Heliothis virescens using calcium imaging. , 2004, Chemical senses.

[36]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. , 1972 .

[37]  R. Menzel,et al.  Associative learning modifies neural representations of odors in the insect brain , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  R. Menzel,et al.  Side-specific olfactory conditioning leads to more specific odor representation between sides but not within sides in the honeybee antennal lobes , 2003, Neuroscience.

[39]  D. Laloi,et al.  Olfactory conditioning of the proboscis extension in bumble bees , 1999 .

[40]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[41]  R. Menzel,et al.  Odorant intensity as a determinant for olfactory conditioning in honeybees: roles in discrimination, overshadowing and memory consolidation. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[42]  M. Heisenberg Mushroom body memoir: from maps to models , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[43]  M. Hammer,et al.  Backward inhibitory learning in honeybees: a behavioral analysis of reinforcement processing. , 1998, Learning & memory.