Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex.

In the most commonly used cochlear prosthesis systems, temporal features of sound are signaled by amplitude modulation of constant-rate pulse trains. Several convincing arguments predict that speech reception should be optimized by use of pulse rates > or approximately 2,000 pulses per second (pps) and by use of intracochlear electrode configurations that produce restricted current spread (e.g., bipolar rather than monopolar configurations). Neither of those predictions has been borne out in consistent improvements in speech reception. Neurons in the auditory cortex of anesthetized guinea pigs phase lock to the envelope of sine-modulated electric pulse trains presented through a cochlear implant. The present study used that animal model to quantify the effects of carrier pulse rate, electrode configuration, current level, and modulator wave shape on transmission of temporal information from a cochlear implant to the auditory cortex. Modulation sensitivity was computed using a signal-detection analysis of cortical phase-locking vector strengths. Increasing carrier pulse rate in 1-octave steps from 254 to 4,069 pps resulted in systematic decreases in sensitivity. Comparison of sine- versus square-wave modulator waveforms demonstrated that some, but not all, of the loss of modulation sensitivity at high pulse rates was a result of the decreasing size of pulse-to-pulse current steps at the higher rates. Use of a narrow bipolar electrode configuration, compared with the monopolar configuration, produced a marked decrease in modulation sensitivity. Results from this animal model suggest explanations for the failure of high pulse rates and/or bipolar electrode configurations to produce hoped-for improvements in speech reception.

[1]  C E Schreiner,et al.  Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. II. Repetition rate coding. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  M. Semple,et al.  Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Edwin C. Moxon,et al.  Physiological Considerations in Artificial Stimulation of the Inner Ear , 1972, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[4]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  B S Wilson,et al.  The future of cochlear implants. , 1997, British journal of audiology.

[6]  L Geurts,et al.  Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: a comparison of single neurons and behavior. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  I. Winter,et al.  Responses of single units in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the guinea pig , 1990, Hearing Research.

[9]  S. Telian,et al.  Performance with the 20 + 2L lateral wall cochlear implant. , 1998, The American journal of otology.

[10]  J. Miller,et al.  Single cell activity in the awake monkey cortex: intensity encoding. , 1977, Transactions. Section on Otolaryngology. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology.

[11]  R Beitel,et al.  Temporal resolution of neurons in cat inferior colliculus to intracochlear electrical stimulation: effects of neonatal deafening and chronic stimulation. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  M Vollmer,et al.  Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated intracochlear electrical pulses in deaf cats. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Bertrand Delgutte,et al.  Phase-locking of auditory-nerve discharges to sinusoidal electric stimulation of the cochlea , 1992, Hearing Research.

[14]  P J Blamey,et al.  Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Margaret W Skinner,et al.  Effects of Stimulation Rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE Speech Coding Strategy , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[16]  Robert V Shannon,et al.  Open Set Speech Perception with Auditory Brainstem Implant? , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[17]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[18]  John C Middlebrooks,et al.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  C M McKay,et al.  Dual temporal pitch percepts from acoustic and electric amplitude-modulated pulse trains. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  M. Dorman,et al.  The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  The effect of electrode configuration and duration of deafness on threshold and selectivity of responses to intracochlear electrical stimulation. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  R. Shannon,et al.  Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  John C Middlebrooks,et al.  Auditory cortex phase locking to amplitude-modulated cochlear implant pulse trains. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  T. Lenarz,et al.  Place-pitch and speech perception measures with bipolar and monopolar electrical stimulation of the cochlea. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[25]  B Efron,et al.  Statistical Data Analysis in the Computer Age , 1991, Science.

[26]  John C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Topographic Spread of Inferior Colliculus Activation in Response to Acoustic and Intracochlear Electric Stimulation , 2004, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[27]  Alan R Palmer,et al.  Phase-locked responses to pure tones in the inferior colliculus. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  R. Snyder,et al.  Degradation of temporal resolution in the auditory midbrain after prolonged deafness is reversed by electrical stimulation of the cochlea. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  H J McDermott,et al.  Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  J. T Rubinstein,et al.  Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation , 1999, Hearing Research.

[31]  John C Middlebrooks,et al.  Effects of cochlear-implant pulse rate and inter-channel timing on channel interactions and thresholds. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  G M Clark,et al.  Differential electrical excitation of the auditory nerve. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  W Baumgartner,et al.  Optimization of channel number and stimulation rate for the fast continuous interleaved sampling strategy in the COMBI 40+. , 1997, The American journal of otology.

[34]  M Pelizzone,et al.  Low-pass filtering in amplitude modulation detection associated with vowel and consonant identification in subjects with cochlear implants. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Julie Arenberg Bierer,et al.  Cortical Responses to Cochlear Implant Stimulation: Channel Interactions , 2004, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[36]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Responses of Cat Auditory Nerve Fibers to Biphasic Electrical Current Pulses , 1987 .

[37]  D T Lawson,et al.  Temporal representations with cochlear implants. , 1997, The American journal of otology.

[38]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  Changes Across Time in the Temporal Responses of Auditory Nerve Fibers Stimulated by Electric Pulse Trains , 2008, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[39]  Marco Pelizzone,et al.  Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  Q. Fu Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users , 2002, Neuroreport.

[41]  E. Applebaum,et al.  Transplants and implants in otology ii, edited by n. yanagihara and j.i. suzuki, 413 pages, kugler publications, new york, 1992, $140.00 , 1993 .

[42]  K. Plant,et al.  Speech Perception as a Function of Electrical Stimulation Rate: Using the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant System , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[43]  G M Clark,et al.  The perception of temporal modulations by cochlear implant patients. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  Hideki Kawai,et al.  Spectral integration in auditory cortex: Mechanisms and modulation , 2005, Hearing Research.

[45]  William R. Webster,et al.  Measurement of frequency selectivity of single neurons in the central auditory pathway , 1983, Hearing Research.

[46]  Li Xu,et al.  Effects of Electrode Configuration and Place of Stimulation on Speech Perception with Cochlear Prostheses , 2000, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[47]  Bryan E Pfingst,et al.  Effects of carrier pulse rate and stimulation site on modulation detection by subjects with cochlear implants. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  John C Middlebrooks,et al.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  C. Parkins,et al.  Temporal response patterns of auditory nerve fibers to electrical stimulation in deafened squirrel monkeys , 1989, Hearing Research.

[51]  Monita Chatterjee,et al.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition , 2008, Hearing Research.

[52]  L. Carney,et al.  Neural rate and timing cues for detection and discrimination of amplitude-modulated tones in the awake rabbit inferior colliculus. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  R. Shannon Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Temporal response patterns of single auditory nerve fibers elicited by periodic electrical stimuli , 1987, Hearing Research.

[55]  John C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity , 2008, Hearing Research.

[56]  Charles A. Miller,et al.  Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation I: Comparison of scala tympani and intrameatal electrode responses , 2006, Hearing Research.

[57]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  P H Ward,et al.  Tumor Recurrence within Myocutaneous Flaps , 1987, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[59]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  Changes Across Time in Spike Rate and Spike Amplitude of Auditory Nerve Fibers Stimulated by Electric Pulse Trains , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[60]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[61]  Bertrand Delgutte,et al.  Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  Marco Pelizzone,et al.  Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[63]  F B Simmons,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. , 1966, Archives of otolaryngology.

[64]  J. Eggermont Temporal modulation transfer functions for AM and FM stimuli in cat auditory cortex. Effects of carrier type, modulating waveform and intensity , 1994, Hearing Research.

[65]  Chris van den Honert,et al.  Effect of electrode configuration on psychophysical forward masking in cochlear implant listeners. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[66]  R. Shannon Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics , 1983, Hearing Research.

[67]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Intensity discrimination and detection of amplitude modulation in electric hearing. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[68]  Rainer Hartmann,et al.  Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents , 1998, Hearing Research.

[69]  S A Telian,et al.  Patient performance with the Cochlear Corporation "20 + 2" implant: bipolar versus monopolar activation. , 1996, The American journal of otology.

[70]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  Effects of Stimulation Rate, Mode and Level on Modulation Detection by Cochlear Implant Users , 2005, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[71]  C E Schreiner,et al.  Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds. , 2004, Physiological reviews.

[72]  Teresa A. Zwolan,et al.  Effects of stimulus configuration on psychophysical operating levels and on speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1997, Hearing Research.