Inter-hemispheric interaction facilitates face processing

Many recent studies have revealed that interaction between the left and right cerebral hemispheres can aid in task performance, but these studies have tended to examine perception of simple stimuli such as letters, digits or simple shapes, which may have limited naturalistic validity. The present study extends these prior findings to a more naturalistic face perception task. Matching tasks required subjects to indicate when a target face matched one of two probe faces. Matches could be either across-field, requiring inter-hemispheric interaction, or within-field, not requiring inter-hemispheric interaction. Subjects indicated when faces matched in emotional expression (Experiment 1; n=32) or in character identity (Experiment 2; n=32). In both experiments, across-field performance was significantly better than within-field performance, supporting the primary hypothesis. Further, this advantage was greater for the more difficult character identity task. Results offer qualified support for the hypothesis that inter-hemispheric interaction is especially advantageous as task demands increase.

[1]  T. Ludwig,et al.  Hemispheric interactions: The Bilateral Advantage and Task Difficulty , 1992, Cortex.

[2]  M. Farah Is face recognition ‘special’? Evidence from neuropsychology , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[3]  M. Banich,et al.  An unbalanced distribution of inputs across the hemispheres facilitates interhemispheric interaction , 2000, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[4]  R. Compton,et al.  Effects of worry and evaluation stress on interhemispheric interaction. , 2001, Neuropsychology.

[5]  J. Piven,et al.  Abnormal Processing of Social Information from Faces in Autism , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Banich,et al.  Global-local interference modulated by communication between the hemispheres. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  John J. Magee,et al.  Categorical perception of facial expressions , 1992, Cognition.

[8]  M. Tovée,et al.  Is Face Processing Special? , 1998, Neuron.

[9]  A Belger,et al.  Costs and benefits of integrating information between the cerebral hemispheres: a computational perspective. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[10]  G. Maccarthy,et al.  Physiological studies of face processing in humans , 2000 .

[11]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial expression megamix: Tests of dimensional and category accounts of emotion recognition , 1997, Cognition.

[12]  Sönke Johannes,et al.  Brain potentials reveal the timing of face identity and expression judgments , 1998, Neuroscience Research.

[13]  M A Bobes,et al.  Different scalp topography of brain potentials related to expression and identity matching of faces. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[14]  P. Ekman Pictures of Facial Affect , 1976 .

[15]  J. Hellige,et al.  Processing from LVF, RVF and BILATERAL presentations: Examinations of metacontrol and interhemispheric interaction , 1988, Brain and Cognition.

[16]  J. Liederman,et al.  The effect of task difficulty upon the extent to which performance benefits from between-hemisphere division of inputs. , 1990, The International journal of neuroscience.

[17]  M. Banich,et al.  The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks. , 2000, Neuropsychology.

[18]  D. Perrett,et al.  Categorical Perception of Morphed Facial Expressions , 1996 .

[19]  G. Celani,et al.  The Understanding of the Emotional Meaning of Facial Expressions in People with Autism , 1999, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[20]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[21]  F. Volkmar,et al.  Abnormal ventral temporal cortical activity during face discrimination among individuals with autism and Asperger syndrome. , 2000, Archives of general psychiatry.

[22]  Francisco Esteves,et al.  The Face of Wrath: Critical Features for Conveying Facial Threat , 1999 .

[23]  P. Ekman,et al.  Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: a reply to Russell's mistaken critique. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  C. J. Marsolek Dissociable Neural Subsystems Underlie Abstract and Specific Object Recognition , 1999 .

[25]  Edna B. Foa,et al.  Attentional Biases for Facial Expressions in Social Phobia: The Face-in-the-Crowd Paradigm , 1999 .

[26]  E. Darcy Burgund,et al.  Letter-Case-Specific Priming in the Right Cerebral Hemisphere with a Form-Specific Perceptual Identification Task , 1997, Brain and Cognition.

[27]  A. Belger,et al.  Interhemispheric interaction affected by computational complexity , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  M. Farah,et al.  EARLY COMMITMENT OF NEURAL SUBSTRATES FOR FACE RECOGNITION , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[29]  J. Sergent,et al.  Segregated processing of facial identity and emotion in the human brain: A pet study , 1994 .

[30]  All the King's Horses and All the King's Men: Putting the Brain Back Together Again , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[31]  Jacqueline Liederman,et al.  The Dynamics of Interhemispheric Collaboration and Hemispheric Control , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[32]  K. Mogg,et al.  Orienting of Attention to Threatening Facial Expressions Presented under Conditions of Restricted Awareness , 1999 .

[33]  N. Logothetis,et al.  IS FACE RECOGNITION NOT SO UNIQUE AFTER ALL? , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[34]  Louise Stanczak,et al.  Neural Recruitment and Cognitive Aging: Two Hemispheres Are Better Than One, Especially as You Age , 1999 .

[35]  M. Banich,et al.  Investigations of interhemispheric processing: Methodological considerations. , 1994 .

[36]  Michael C Corballis,et al.  Interhemispheric transfer of colour and shape information in the presence and absence of the corpus callosum , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  P. Ekman,et al.  DIFFERENCES Universals and Cultural Differences in the Judgments of Facial Expressions of Emotion , 2004 .

[38]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Expression is computed separately from facial identity, and it is computed separately for moving and static faces: Neuropsychological evidence , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  Aysenil Belger,et al.  Interhemispheric Interaction: How Do the Hemispheres Divide and Conquer a Task? , 1990, Cortex.

[40]  P. Ekman,et al.  Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. , 1971, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  A. Young,et al.  Recognition of facial emotion in nine individuals with bilateral amygdala damage , 1999, Neuropsychologia.