Assessing the Impact of Publications Saved by Mendeley Users: Is There Any Different Pattern Among Users?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Vincent Larivière,et al. Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[2] Vincent Larivière,et al. Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[3] Rodrigo Costas,et al. What is the impact of the publications read by the different Mendeley users? Could they help to identify alternative types of impact? PLoS ALM Workshop, San Francisco , 2013 .
[4] Ludo Waltman,et al. F1000 Recommendations as a Potential New Data Source for Research Evaluation: A Comparison With Citations , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[5] William Gunn,et al. Social Signals Reflect Academic Impact: What it Means When a Scholar Adds a Paper to Mendeley , 2013 .
[6] Mike Thelwall,et al. Not all international collaboration is beneficial: The Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[7] Judit Bar-Ilan,et al. Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community , 2014, Scientometrics.
[8] M. Thelwall,et al. F 1000 , Mendeley and Traditional Bibliometric Indicators , 2012 .
[9] Rodrigo Costas,et al. Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[10] Rodrigo Costas,et al. How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications , 2014, Scientometrics.
[11] Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al. Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations , 2010, J. Informetrics.
[12] Mike Thelwall,et al. Are scholarly articles disproportionately read in their own country? An analysis of mendeley readers , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..