Multi-facet quality assessment of process driven services in collaborative networks

Collaborative networks are constituted by a variety of entities that collaborate to better achieve common or compatible goals. Sharing IT resources in these networks is widely practiced and takes many forms. This fact faces inter organizational information system to many challenges and implies many quality issues. In this context, the Information System Quality (ISQ) management discipline requires a set of assessment mechanisms to evaluate quality characteristics and to plan their evolutions. This paper aims to present a novel model for assessing external quality characteristics of process driven services. The characterization, as proposed here, aims to quantify dependent environment qualities by considering internal, external and in use aspects.

[1]  Liu Jun-qiang.  Information quality maturity model , 2007 .

[2]  Malik F. Saleh,et al.  Information Security Maturity Model , 2011 .

[3]  Marten van Sinderen,et al.  Towards Flexible Inter-enterprise Collaboration: A Supply Chain Perspective , 2009, ICEIS.

[4]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Evaluating leadership, IT quality, and net benefits in an e-government environment , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[5]  Alexander Pretschner,et al.  GoCoMM: a governance and compliance maturity model , 2009, WISG '09.

[6]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Software quality and the Capability Maturity Model , 1997, CACM.

[7]  Ralf Klischewski,et al.  Information Integration or Process Integration? How to Achieve Interoperability in Administration , 2004, EGOV.

[8]  Joan C. Steyaert.  Measuring the performance of electronic government services , 2004 .

[9]  Chien-Chih Yu,et al.  Service-Oriented Data and Process Models for Personalization and Collaboration in e-Business , 2006, EC-Web.

[10]  Christoph Rathfelder,et al.  Towards an Architecture Maintainability Maturity Model (AM3) , 2008, Softwaretechnik-Trends.

[11]  Mark Kasunic,et al.  Measuring Systems Interoperability: Challenges and Opportunities , 2001 .

[12]  Erik Jan Hultink,et al.  Determinants of IT Usage and New Product Performance , 2007 .

[13]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Effect of Information Systems Resources and Capabilities on Firm Performance: A Resource-Based Perspective , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  K. Tserpes,et al.  Information exchange in business collaboration using grid technologies , 2009 .

[15]  Wided Guédria,et al.  Interoperability Maturity Models - Survey and Comparison - , 2008, OTM Workshops.

[16]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Improving Government Interoperability: A capability framework for government managers , 2008 .

[17]  Nicolas Anquetil,et al.  Software quality metrics aggregation in industry , 2013, J. Softw. Evol. Process..

[18]  Antonia Stefani,et al.  Modelling e-commerce systems' quality with belief networks , 2003, IEEE International Symposium on Virtual Environments, Human-Computer Interfaces and Measurement Systems, 2003. VECIMS '03. 2003.

[19]  Herbert Van de Sompel,et al.  A Spectrum of Interoperability: The Site for Science Prototype for the NSDL , 2002, D Lib Mag..

[20]  Antonis C. Stylianou,et al.  An integrative framework for IS quality management , 2000, CACM.

[21]  Ilene Burnstein,et al.  A Testing Maturity Model for Software Test Process Assessment and Improvement , 1999 .

[22]  Alan M. Davis,et al.  Identifying and measuring quality in a software requirements specification , 1993, [1993] Proceedings First International Software Metrics Symposium.