Documentation of discussions about prognosis with terminally ill patients.

PURPOSE Previous studies have suggested the importance of communicating with patients about prognosis at the end of life, yet the prevalence, content, and consequences of such communication have not been fully investigated. The purposes of this study were to estimate the proportion of terminally ill inpatients with documented discussions about prognosis, describe the nature and correlates of such discussions, and assess the association between documented discussions about prognosis and subsequent advance care planning. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Inpatients (n = 232) at least 65 years old who had brain, pancreas, liver, gall bladder, or inoperable lung cancer were randomly selected from six randomly chosen community hospitals in Connecticut. The presence and content of discussions about prognosis, advanced care planning efforts, and sociodemographic and clinical factors were ascertained by comprehensive review of medical records using a standardized abstraction form. RESULTS Discussions about prognosis were documented in the medical records of 89 (38%) patients. Physicians and patients were both present during the discussion in 46 (52%) of these cases. Time until expected death was infrequently documented. Having a documented discussion about prognosis was associated with documented discussions of life-sustaining treatments (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.8 to 12.0) and having a do-not-resuscitate order (adjusted OR = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1 to 4.2). CONCLUSIONS Among terminally ill patients with cancer, discussions about prognosis as documented in medical charts are infrequent and limited in scope. In some cases, such documented discussions may be important catalysts for subsequent discussions of patient and family preferences regarding treatment and future care.

[1]  N. Miyaji,et al.  The power of compassion: truth-telling among American doctors in the care of dying patients. , 1993, Social science & medicine.

[2]  B. Lo,et al.  Patient attitudes to discussing life-sustaining treatment. , 1986, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  J. Klessig,et al.  The effect of values and culture on life-support decisions. , 1992, The Western journal of medicine.

[4]  E. Blanchard,et al.  Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients. , 1988, Social science & medicine.

[5]  J. Berger.  Culture and ethnicity in clinical care. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  W. Grove.  Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[7]  N. Christakis,et al.  Extent and determinants of error in doctors' prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  J. Garrett,et al.  What Is Wrong With End‐of‐Life Care? Opinions of Bereaved Family Members , 1997, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[9]  G. J. Annas.  Informed consent, cancer, and truth in prognosis. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  R. Oye,et al.  Attitudes of hospitalized patients toward life support: a survey of 200 medical inpatients. , 1989, The American journal of medicine.

[11]  F. Harrell,et al.  Accurate Prognostications of Death , 1995 .

[12]  N. Christakis,et al.  Attitude and self-reported practice regarding prognostication in a national sample of internists. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  P. Butow,et al.  When the diagnosis is cancer: Patient communication experiences and preferences , 1996, Cancer.

[14]  L. Goldman,et al.  The SUPPORT Prognostic Model: Objective Estimates of Survival for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Adults , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  T. Delbanco,et al.  Choices about cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital. When do physicians talk with patients? , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  The discussion about advance directives. Patient and physician opinions regarding when and how it should be conducted. End of Life Study Group. , 1995 .

[17]  J. Ptacek,et al.  Breaking Bad News: A Review of the Literature , 1996 .

[18]  P. Symonds,et al.  Information needs of cancer patients in west Scotland: cross sectional survey of patients' views , 1996, BMJ.

[19]  N. Christakis.  Death Foretold: Prophecy and Prognosis in Medical Care , 2000 .

[20]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Advance directives for medical care--a case for greater use. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  D. Cicchetti,et al.  Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. , 1981, American journal of mental deficiency.

[22]  B. Good,et al.  American oncology and the discourse on hope , 1990, Culture, medicine and psychiatry.

[23]  E. Bradley,et al.  Factors Associated with Home Versus Institutional Death Among Cancer Patients in Connecticut , 2001, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[24]  K. Covinsky,et al.  Communication and Decision‐Making in Seriously Ill Patients: Findings of the SUPPORT Project , 2000, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[25]  William A. Knaus,et al.  The SUPPORT Prognostic Model , 1995 .

[26]  L. Goldman,et al.  Resuscitation preferences among patients with severe congestive heart failure: results from the SUPPORT project. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. , 1998, Circulation.

[27]  C Seale,et al.  Communication and awareness about death: a study of a random sample of dying people. , 1991, Social science & medicine.

[28]  J. Lynn,et al.  Patient Preferences for Communication with Physicians about End-of-Life Decisions , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[29]  F. Harrell,et al.  Decision‐Making and Outcomes of Prolonged ICU Stays in Seriously Ill Patients , 2000, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[30]  R. Mcnutt,et al.  The discussion about advance directives. Patient and physician opinions regarding when and how it should be conducted. End of Life Study Group. , 1995, Archives of internal medicine.

[31]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[32]  E. Cook,et al.  Relationship between cancer patients' predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences. , 1998, JAMA.

[33]  J. Fleiss.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[34]  R. Woodruff,et al.  Communicating with Patients with Advanced Cancer , 1997, Journal of palliative care.

[35]  J. Lynn,et al.  Outcomes, preferences for resuscitation, and physician-patient communication among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. , 1998, The American journal of medicine.

[36]  T. Wetle,et al.  Discussions About End‐of‐Life Care in Nursing Homes , 1998, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[37]  F. Harrell,et al.  Accurate prognostications of death. Opportunities and challenges for clinicians. , 1995, The Western journal of medicine.

[38]  B. Cassileth,et al.  Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. , 1980, Annals of internal medicine.

[39]  N. Wenger,et al.  Life‐Sustaining Treatment Decisions for Nursing Home Residents: Who Discusses, Who Decides and What Is Decided? , 1999, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[40]  D. Schapira,et al.  Cancer patients' insight into their treatment, prognosis, and unconventional therapies , 1984, Cancer.