The more multidisciplinary the better? - The prevalence and interdisciplinarity of research collaborations in multidisciplinary institutions

Abstract Scientific research is increasingly relying on collaborations to address complex real-world problems. Many researchers, policymakers, and administrators consider a multidisciplinary environment an important factor for fostering research collaborations, especially interdisciplinary ones that involve researchers from different disciplines. However, it remains unknown whether a higher level of multidisciplinarity within an academic institution is associated with internal collaborations that are more prevalent and more interdisciplinary. Analyzing 90,000 publications by 2500 faculty members in over 100 academic institutions from three multidisciplinary areas, information, public policy, and neuroscience, we investigated the connection between multidisciplinarity and research collaborations. Based on social network analysis and text mining, our analysis suggests that more multidisciplinary institutions are not necessarily more collaborative, although they do feature collaborations that are more interdisciplinary. Our findings provide implications for academic administrators and policymakers to promote research collaborations and interdisciplinarity in academic institutions.

[1]  Julie Siciliano,et al.  The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance , 1996 .

[2]  Jimi Adams,et al.  Mapping Interdisciplinary Fields: Efficiencies, Gaps and Redundancies in HIV/AIDS Research , 2014, PloS one.

[3]  Hiroki Sayama,et al.  Characterizing Interdisciplinarity of Researchers and Research Topics Using Web Search Engines , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  Joon-Oh Park,et al.  The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2011 .

[5]  Andrea Wiggins,et al.  Intellectual diversity and the faculty composition of iSchools , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  M. Newman Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Rich Gazan,et al.  Assessing researcher interdisciplinarity: a case study of the University of Hawaii NASA Astrobiology Institute , 2012, Scientometrics.

[8]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  The evolution of interdisciplinarity in physics research , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Charles B. Shrader,et al.  Board of Director Diversity and Firm Financial Performance , 2003 .

[10]  G. Bowker,et al.  Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: a comparative case study of two scientific teams , 2004 .

[11]  Beth G. Chung-Herrera,et al.  Diversity in organizations: Where are we now and where are we going? , 2009 .

[12]  Ying Ding,et al.  Understanding persistent scientific collaboration , 2018, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Who collaborates successfully?: prior experience reduces collaboration barriers in distributed interdisciplinary research , 2008, CSCW.

[14]  Yiming Zhao,et al.  Understanding success through the diversity of collaborators and the milestone of career , 2018, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  T. Turpin,et al.  Research collaboration in the social sciences: What factors are associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary collaboration? , 2015 .

[16]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and refutations;: The growth of scientific knowledge , 1972 .

[17]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience , 2009, Scientometrics.

[18]  A. Regalado,et al.  Multiauthor papers on the rise. , 1995, Science.

[19]  Mark Steyvers,et al.  Finding scientific topics , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Liwen Qiu A study of interdisciplinary research collaboration , 1992 .

[21]  W. Cleveland Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[22]  A. Homan,et al.  Diversity mindsets and the performance of diverse teams , 2013 .

[23]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science , 2008, Science.

[24]  Judith Giordan,et al.  Impact of Transformative Interdisciplinary Research and Graduate Education on Academic Institutions. Workshop Report. , 2008 .

[25]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[26]  Kang Zhao,et al.  Early Predictions of Movie Success: The Who, What, and When of Profitability , 2015, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Christopher King,et al.  Multiauthor Papers: Onward and Upward , 2012 .

[28]  John Fiske A Century of Science , 2010 .

[29]  Jian Wang,et al.  Interdisciplinarity and Impact: Distinct Effects of Variety, Balance, and Disparity , 2014, ISSI.

[30]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Betweenness Centrality" as an Indicator of the , 2006 .

[31]  Lili Wang,et al.  Interdisciplinarity of nano research fields: a keyword mining approach , 2012, Scientometrics.

[32]  Beatrice Gibbons-Kunka,et al.  Celebrating Diversity in Organizations: An Analysis of Workplace Initiatives , 2010 .

[33]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact , 2016, Science.

[34]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[35]  Jonathan Adams Collaborations: The rise of research networks , 2012, Nature.

[36]  Baofeng Huo,et al.  The impact of internal integration and relationship commitment on external integration , 2011 .

[37]  María Bordons,et al.  Measuring interdisciplinary collaboration within a university: The effects of the multidisciplinary research programme , 1999, Scientometrics.

[38]  F. J. Rijnsoever,et al.  Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration , 2011 .

[39]  Zheng Xie,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of the Interdisciplinarity of Applied Mathematics , 2015, PloS one.

[40]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[41]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[42]  John T. Slattery,et al.  The Road We Must Take: Multidisciplinary Team Science , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[43]  Japera Johnson,et al.  Gender diversity strategy in academic departments: exploring organizational determinants , 2015 .

[44]  Richard Van Noorden Interdisciplinary research by the numbers , 2015, Nature.

[45]  Adam Worrall,et al.  Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[46]  John Whitfield,et al.  Collaboration: Group theory , 2008, Nature.

[47]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[48]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Research collaboration and research output: A longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university , 2009 .

[49]  W. Wulf,et al.  Collaborative Research across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries , 2008 .

[50]  I. Leeds,et al.  Academic institutions as agents for international outreach. , 2010, JAMA.

[51]  John Yen,et al.  Assortativity Patterns in Multi-dimensional Inter-organizational Networks: A Case Study of the Humanitarian Relief Sector , 2010, SBP.

[52]  Leah G. Nichols A topic model approach to measuring interdisciplinarity at the National Science Foundation , 2014, Scientometrics.

[53]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity , 2005 .

[54]  Heidi Ledford How to solve the world's biggest problems , 2015, Nature.

[55]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[56]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time , 2009, Scientometrics.

[57]  Salvador Roig Dobón,et al.  Diversity and business performance: 50 years of research , 2007 .

[58]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity , 2007, Scientometrics.

[59]  Kang Zhao,et al.  The state and evolution of U.S. iSchools: From talent acquisitions to research outcome , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[60]  D. P. Baker,et al.  Teamwork as an essential component of high-reliability organizations. , 2006, Health services research.

[61]  Alexander Michael Petersen,et al.  Quantifying the impact of weak, strong, and super ties in scientific careers , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  Klaus Lehnertz,et al.  Assortative mixing in functional brain networks during epileptic seizures , 2013, Chaos.

[63]  I. Ràfols,et al.  Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity , 2015, PloS one.

[64]  Min Song,et al.  Understanding the evolving academic landscape of library and information science through faculty hiring data , 2016, Scientometrics.

[65]  Ke Zhang,et al.  Understanding spatial homophily: the case of peer influence and social selection , 2014, WWW.

[66]  Ioannis Pavlidis,et al.  Together we stand , 2014, Nature Physics.

[67]  Daniel B. Larremore,et al.  Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks , 2015, Science Advances.

[68]  D. Harrison,et al.  Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning , 2002 .

[69]  Yuxiao Dong,et al.  A Century of Science: Globalization of Scientific Collaborations, Citations, and Innovations , 2017, KDD.

[70]  E. Salas,et al.  Facilitating Innovation in Diverse Science Teams Through Integrative Capacity , 2012 .

[71]  Joachim Schummer,et al.  Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology , 2004, Scientometrics.

[72]  S. Jackson,et al.  Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications , 2003 .